As an attorney, I have to strongly oppose this idea. If people aren't allowed to act like flaming idiots and then pay big bucks to avoide the consequences of their actions, our livelihoods will be threatened.
I wonder when we'll get computer judges. Frankly, a large part of the effort in trials right now is all about attorneys playing to human psychological foibles in order to influence the decisions of judges and juries. Judegs are given wide latitude because of their expertise, there is a large and growing body of evidence showing that expertise tends to be quite overrated (especially by those who claim to have it). There's also a lot of evidence that bad judgments are more frequent than we would like to expect (for instacne the realization, with the advent of DNA technology, that eye-witness testimony is quite unreliable).
Read, for example, Thinking Fast and Slow, The Signal and the Noise and The Black Swan.