Science & Environment

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Serious infections linked to dementia risk, study shows
Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Richard Sima, The Washington Post
Published Oct 18, 2024 • 5 minute read

Getting sick feels bad in the moment and may affect your brain in the longer term.


A new study published in Nature Aging adds to growing evidence that severe infections, including flu, herpes and respiratory tract infections, are linked to accelerated brain atrophy and increased risk of dementia years later. It also hints at the biological drivers that may contribute to neurodegenerative disease.

The current research is a “leap beyond previous studies that had already associated infection with susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease” and provides a “useful dataset,” said Rudy Tanzi, a professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and the director of the McCance Center for Brain Health at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Other recent studies have found that the flu shot and the shingles vaccine reduce the risk of subsequent dementia in those who get them. Severe infections have also been linked to subsequent strokes and heart attacks.


“Vaccines are going to be the most protection against both the acute infection as well as these post-infectious effects,” said Kristen Funk, an assistant professor of biological sciences at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte who studies neuroinflammation in neuroinfectious and neurodegenerative diseases.

Severe infections linked to brain atrophy and dementia
“The idea that infections can influence brain health for some people has been a no-brainer, especially those who themselves experienced infections,” said Keenan Walker, a tenure-track investigator and the director of the Multimodal Imaging of Neurodegenerative Disease Unit at the National Institute on Aging.

Even small infections can change the way we think and behave. More-severe infections can, in the short term, result in delirium, which may be associated with long-term cognitive problems, Walker said. “Big infection, big immune response – not good for the brain,” he said.


The hypothesis that infections may play a role in neurodegenerative diseases has been around, albeit more on the fringes, Walker said. That changed with the coronavirus pandemic and evidence of the lasting cognitive costs of long covid, which invigorated interest in the field.

Growing evidence suggests that the link “doesn’t seem to be specific to any type of infection, whether it be bacterial or viral,” said Walker, who was an author of the study.

Walker and his colleagues relied on data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, one of the longest-running studies of human aging in the United States. They also tracked how brain volume changed in 982 cognitively normal adults, with or without a history of infection, by taking repeated neuroimaging, starting in 2009. About 43 percent of participants had no history of infections.


Out of the 15 types of infections investigated, six – including flu, herpes, respiratory tract infections and skin infections – were associated with accelerated loss of brain volume. Brain atrophy was particularly pronounced in the temporal lobe, an area containing the hippocampus, which is important for memory and implicated in Alzheimer’s disease.

“They really found that there’s a range of infections that are associated with this brain atrophy, associated with this cognitive decline,” said Funk, who was not involved in the study.


In turn, most of these infections associated with brain atrophy seem to be risk factors for dementia, according to the researchers’ analyses of the UK Biobank data of 495,896 subjects and a Finnish dataset of 273,132 subjects.


They found that having a history of infections was associated with an increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease years later. The increased risk was even higher for vascular dementia, which is the second-most-common dementia diagnosis after Alzheimer’s disease and caused by restriction of blood to the brain.

Biological links between brain and infections
Scientists still do not understand how infections are biologically linked to increased dementia risk. But there are hints in the immune system.

In the current study, people with a history of infections also had changes to 260 immune-related proteins out of the 942 researchers tested from blood samples. A subset of 35 proteins was also associated with brain-volume changes. Some proteins seemed pathogenic and linked to reduced brain volume, while others were protective.


In general, infections were associated with increases in pathogenic proteins and decreases in protective ones.

“You might be seeing a loss of protection, or some neuroprotection that was never there,” Walker said.

This study “does shed some light on potential biological pathways that actually lead to the increase in dementia risk after severe infections,” said Charlotte Warren-Gash, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who was not involved in the study.

Better understanding of the proteins involved may one day lead to better targeting of the immune system.

But researchers cautioned that this study is just one more piece in the puzzle of dementia and shows correlations between infections, immune-related proteins and neurological effects, but not causation.


The study also does not adequately address how amyloid beta plaques and tau tangles, key biological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease, play into the link between infections and dementia, Tanzi said.

More-minor infections are not cause for alarm since the data was drawn from patients who had a hospital record of their infections, indicating more-severe cases, experts say.

Previous research conducted by Warren-Gash and her colleagues suggests that weaker infections increased the risk of subsequent dementia by about 2 percent, while infections requiring hospitalizations almost doubled dementia risk.

“We all get infections all the time,” Funk said. “It’s not necessarily a doomsday.”

Advice for reducing severe infections and dementia risk

The 2024 Lancet Commission report on dementia lays out 14 modifiable risk factors, which together account for 45 percent of dementia cases. To cut dementia risk and lengthen our cognitive health spans, studies suggest steps such as staying socially connected, moderating alcohol intake and addressing hearing loss.

Reducing the risk for serious infections remains important for both short-term and long-term health, experts say.

Vaccinations are the best way to prevent severe infections. Getting the flu and covid-19 shots can reduce complications, hospitalizations and the number of deaths from the viral infections. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also recommends the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine for everyone over 75 years old, and for those over 60 who are at increased risk for severe RSV. The CDC anticipates about 800,000 hospitalizations from flu, covid and RSV this year.

In addition, the CDC recommends two doses of the shingles vaccine for everyone 50 and older.

Other health practices such as wearing a mask and properly washing your hands also help reduce infection risk.

“The best thing you can do other than responding to an infection with symptomatic care after they occur is preventing them in the first place,” Walker said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nallapati

nallapati

New Member
Sep 12, 2018
7
2
3
Serious infections linked to dementia risk, study shows
Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Richard Sima, The Washington Post
Published Oct 18, 2024 • 5 minute read

Getting sick feels bad in the moment and may affect your brain in the longer term.


A new study published in Nature Aging adds to growing evidence that severe infections, including flu, herpes and respiratory tract infections, are linked to accelerated brain atrophy and increased risk of dementia years later. It also hints at the biological drivers that may contribute to neurodegenerative disease.

The current research is a “leap beyond previous studies that had already associated infection with susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease” and provides a “useful dataset,” said Rudy Tanzi, a professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and the director of the McCance Center for Brain Health at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Other recent studies have found that the flu shot and the shingles vaccine reduce the risk of subsequent dementia in those who get them. Severe infections have also been linked to subsequent strokes and heart attacks.


“Vaccines are going to be the most protection against both the acute infection as well as these post-infectious effects,” said Kristen Funk, an assistant professor of biological sciences at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte who studies neuroinflammation in neuroinfectious and neurodegenerative diseases.

Severe infections linked to brain atrophy and dementia
“The idea that infections can influence brain health for some people has been a no-brainer, especially those who themselves experienced infections,” said Keenan Walker, a tenure-track investigator and the director of the Multimodal Imaging of Neurodegenerative Disease Unit at the National Institute on Aging.

Even small infections can change the way we think and behave. More-severe infections can, in the short term, result in delirium, which may be associated with long-term cognitive problems, Walker said. “Big infection, big immune response – not good for the brain,” he said.


The hypothesis that infections may play a role in neurodegenerative diseases has been around, albeit more on the fringes, Walker said. That changed with the coronavirus pandemic and evidence of the lasting cognitive costs of long covid, which invigorated interest in the field.

Growing evidence suggests that the link “doesn’t seem to be specific to any type of infection, whether it be bacterial or viral,” said Walker, who was an author of the study.

Walker and his colleagues relied on data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, one of the longest-running studies of human aging in the United States. They also tracked how brain volume changed in 982 cognitively normal adults, with or without a history of infection, by taking repeated neuroimaging, starting in 2009. About 43 percent of participants had no history of infections.


Out of the 15 types of infections investigated, six – including flu, herpes, respiratory tract infections and skin infections – were associated with accelerated loss of brain volume. Brain atrophy was particularly pronounced in the temporal lobe, an area containing the hippocampus, which is important for memory and implicated in Alzheimer’s disease.

“They really found that there’s a range of infections that are associated with this brain atrophy, associated with this cognitive decline,” said Funk, who was not involved in the study.


In turn, most of these infections associated with brain atrophy seem to be risk factors for dementia, according to the researchers’ analyses of the UK Biobank data of 495,896 subjects and a Finnish dataset of 273,132 subjects.


They found that having a history of infections was associated with an increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease years later. The increased risk was even higher for vascular dementia, which is the second-most-common dementia diagnosis after Alzheimer’s disease and caused by restriction of blood to the brain.

Biological links between brain and infections
Scientists still do not understand how infections are biologically linked to increased dementia risk. But there are hints in the immune system.

In the current study, people with a history of infections also had changes to 260 immune-related proteins out of the 942 researchers tested from blood samples. A subset of 35 proteins was also associated with brain-volume changes. Some proteins seemed pathogenic and linked to reduced brain volume, while others were protective.


In general, infections were associated with increases in pathogenic proteins and decreases in protective ones.

“You might be seeing a loss of protection, or some neuroprotection that was never there,” Walker said.

This study “does shed some light on potential biological pathways that actually lead to the increase in dementia risk after severe infections,” said Charlotte Warren-Gash, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who was not involved in the study.

Better understanding of the proteins involved may one day lead to better targeting of the immune system.

But researchers cautioned that this study is just one more piece in the puzzle of dementia and shows correlations between infections, immune-related proteins and neurological effects, but not causation.


The study also does not adequately address how amyloid beta plaques and tau tangles, key biological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease, play into the link between infections and dementia, Tanzi said.

More-minor infections are not cause for alarm since the data was drawn from patients who had a hospital record of their infections, indicating more-severe cases, experts say.

Previous research conducted by Warren-Gash and her colleagues suggests that weaker infections increased the risk of subsequent dementia by about 2 percent, while infections requiring hospitalizations almost doubled dementia risk.

“We all get infections all the time,” Funk said. “It’s not necessarily a doomsday.”

Advice for reducing severe infections and dementia risk

The 2024 Lancet Commission report on dementia lays out 14 modifiable risk factors, which together account for 45 percent of dementia cases. To cut dementia risk and lengthen our cognitive health spans, studies suggest steps such as staying socially connected, moderating alcohol intake and addressing hearing loss.

Reducing the risk for serious infections remains important for both short-term and long-term health, experts say.

Vaccinations are the best way to prevent severe infections. Getting the flu and covid-19 shots can reduce complications, hospitalizations and the number of deaths from the viral infections. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also recommends the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine for everyone over 75 years old, and for those over 60 who are at increased risk for severe RSV. The CDC anticipates about 800,000 hospitalizations from flu, covid and RSV this year.

In addition, the CDC recommends two doses of the shingles vaccine for everyone 50 and older.

Other health practices such as wearing a mask and properly washing your hands also help reduce infection risk.

“The best thing you can do other than responding to an infection with symptomatic care after they occur is preventing them in the first place,” Walker said.
Wow, this study really makes you stop and think! It’s wild to consider that something as simple as getting sick could mess with our brains later on.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Donor wakes up on operating table as doctors prepare to harvest organs
Author of the article:Denette Wilford
Published Oct 18, 2024 • 2 minute read

A petrified organ donor came back to life, “thrashing around” and “crying visibly” on the operating room table of a Kentucky hospital as surgeons prepared to harvest his body parts.


Thomas “T.J.” Hoover was declared brain-dead after he was taken to Baptist Health Richmond Hospital in Richmond, Ky., in October 2021 following a drug overdose.

But as doctors went to test his heart health for transplantation, Hoover reportedly appeared very much alive, according to the patient’s sister and former Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates (KODA) employees in the room.

“He was moving around … thrashing around on the bed,” Natasha Miller told NPR.

“And then when we went over there, you could see he had tears coming down. He was crying visibly.”

Hoover’s sister, Donna Rhorer, said she became concerned when Hoover seemed to open his eyes and look around as he was being wheeled from the intensive care unit to the operating room.

“It was like it was his way of letting us know, you know, ‘Hey, I’m still here,’” she told the outlet, however, she and other family members were told it was just a common reflex.

The whole scene was “very chaotic,” Miller said, as two surgeons refused to move forward with the surgery.

“Everyone was just very upset.”



But things became more disturbing when Miller relayed what happened to a supervisor at KODA, which coordinated the transplant, who then told her that they were still “going to do this case” and the hospital needed to “find another doctor to do it.”

Another KODA worker, Nyckoletta Martin, said that while reviewing Hoover’s case, she discovered that the donor had previously showed signs of life as doctors examined his heart to see if it was viable for transplantation.

“The donor had woken up during his procedure that morning for a cardiac catheterization. And he was thrashing around on the table,” Martin told NPR.

According to case file records, the Hippocratic oath takers sedated the struggling Hoover when he awoke — and proceeded with their transplant plans.


The organ retrieval was ultimately cancelled, resulting in several employees, including Martin, to quit in the aftermath.


“I’ve dedicated my entire life to organ donation and transplant,” Martin said.

“It’s very scary to me now that these things are allowed to happen and there’s not more in place to protect donors.”

KODA officials have denied that any of their employees instructed doctors to “collect organs from any living patient.”

It added in a statement: “KODA does not recover organs from living patients. KODA has never pressured its team members to do so.’

Kentucky’s state attorney general and the federal Health Resources and Services Administration are both investigating the allegations.



Hoover survived and lives with his sister, according to the outlet.

He recovered but still has some issues with his memory, walking and talking.

“That’s everybody’s worst nightmare, right? Being alive during surgery and knowing that someone is going to cut you open and take your body parts out?” Martin said.

“That’s horrifying.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Hong Kong discovers dinosaur fossils for first time
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Kanis Leung
Published Oct 23, 2024 • 1 minute read

Officials in Hong Kong said Wednesday they have discovered dinosaur fossils in the city for the first time on a remote, uninhabited island that's part of a geopark.
Officials in Hong Kong said Wednesday they have discovered dinosaur fossils in the city for the first time on a remote, uninhabited island that's part of a geopark.
HONG KONG — Officials in Hong Kong said Wednesday they have discovered dinosaur fossils in the city for the first time on a remote, uninhabited island that’s part of a geopark.


Experts have initially confirmed the fossils were part of a large dinosaur from the Cretaceous period, about 145 million to 66 million years ago, the government said in a statement. They will need to conduct further studies to confirm the species of the dinosaur.

Experts speculate that the dinosaur was likely buried by sand and gravel after its death before it was later washed to the surface by a large flood, and subsequently buried again at the discovery site, it said.

The government said the conservation department in March informed its Antiquities and Monuments Office about a sedimentary rock containing substances suspected to be vertebrate fossils. The rock was found on Port Island in the Hong Kong UNESCO Global Geopark in the city’s northeastern waters.

The government said it commissioned mainland Chinese experts to conduct field investigations.

Port Island is closed to the public from Wednesday until further notice to facilitate future investigations and excavations.

The fossils will be on display at the Hong Kong Heritage Discovery Centre in Tsim Sha Tsui, one of the city’s popular shopping districts, starting on Friday. The government is also planning to open a temporary workshop for the public to observe experts’ preparation of fossil specimens by the end of 2024.
GettyImages-2167965055[1].jpg
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
We all have too many reusable bags, it's a disaster
Reusable shopping bags were sold as being better for the environment, that turns out to be a lie.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Oct 28, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

We've been told that reusable bags will save the environment. Turns out, that's not true.
Brian Lilley says he has 25 "reusable" grocery bags, plus other speciality bags, sitting by his front door. It's not a helping the environment.
There are currently 25 “reusable” grocery store-style bags sitting at my front door, half a dozen large shopping bags and a similar number of bags with dividers to carry bottles home from the liquor store.


Can we finally agree that doing away with paper and plastic shopping bags was a mistake and an environmental disaster?

There is no way that these “reusable” bags, which will live for years and years, are having a smaller environmental impact than what they replaced.

“Help us protect the environment. Use this bag each time you shop,” say the bags from one grocery store chain.

“Wash in cold water,” says the bag from another store.

Yes, you likely didn’t realize that these bags that carry meat and vegetables, cleaners and canned goods to your home needed to be cleaned regularly.


“Reusable grocery bags and bins can collect harmful bacteria from foods. These bacteria can also contaminate other foods or items in the bags/bins and put you at risk of food poisoning,” warns Health Canada.


Also little known is that the total environmental impact of reusable bags is often greater than the plastic bags they replaced.

Depending on how your “reusable” bag is manufactured, you would have to use that bag between 45 and 52 times before it would be better for the environment than an old-fashioned plastic grocery bag.

Is that likely to happen?

Maybe for some, but most likely not for most of us.

The study on how often “reusable” bags need to be used wasn’t conducted by a right-wing think tank but rather the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Unlike so many of our environmentalists, they laid the facts on the line rather than trying to put forward politics as science.

Did you know that for an organic cotton bag to have a lower environmental impact than a plastic grocery bag, it would need to be used 2,000 times?



If you want to use an organic cotton bag for your shopping, knock yourself out but know that the construction of that bag comes with a cost — environmental and otherwise. For far too long, we’ve taken hardline positions that don’t recognize the reality of the situation.

Plastic is always bad, even paper bags are bad to some. The sturdier “reusable” plastic bags are obviously considered better, according to our policymakers and green-oriented corporations, even if the total environmental impact is bigger than a plastic shopping bag.

It’s a kind of green virtue signalling.

It would have been more than 20 years ago when I was interviewing an honest environmental expert on the issue of what kind of shopping bag is best. At that point, the debate was whether paper or plastic bags were best.


“It depends,” said my expert.

He went on to detail that factors such as the weight of the bag, how far it was being shipped, whether it could be reused — all played into the environmental impact.

We don’t get thoughtful analysis like that these days; we get declarations that companies will show their green bona fides by banning shopping bags, except the “reusable” kind that they will charge you for and make a handy profit on.

For the 25 “reusable” grocery bags sitting in my front closet — never mind the half dozen in the trunk of my car — they would have to be used between 1,125 and 1,300 times to be an environmental benefit.

There is nothing wrong with using a “reusable” bag if you want to, but enforcing it by government or corporate edict isn’t the win advocates claim it is.

Let’s drop the dogma and get back to reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
We all have too many reusable bags, it's a disaster
Reusable shopping bags were sold as being better for the environment, that turns out to be a lie.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Oct 28, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

We've been told that reusable bags will save the environment. Turns out, that's not true.
Brian Lilley says he has 25 "reusable" grocery bags, plus other speciality bags, sitting by his front door. It's not a helping the environment.
There are currently 25 “reusable” grocery store-style bags sitting at my front door, half a dozen large shopping bags and a similar number of bags with dividers to carry bottles home from the liquor store.


Can we finally agree that doing away with paper and plastic shopping bags was a mistake and an environmental disaster?

There is no way that these “reusable” bags, which will live for years and years, are having a smaller environmental impact than what they replaced.

“Help us protect the environment. Use this bag each time you shop,” say the bags from one grocery store chain.

“Wash in cold water,” says the bag from another store.

Yes, you likely didn’t realize that these bags that carry meat and vegetables, cleaners and canned goods to your home needed to be cleaned regularly.


“Reusable grocery bags and bins can collect harmful bacteria from foods. These bacteria can also contaminate other foods or items in the bags/bins and put you at risk of food poisoning,” warns Health Canada.


Also little known is that the total environmental impact of reusable bags is often greater than the plastic bags they replaced.

Depending on how your “reusable” bag is manufactured, you would have to use that bag between 45 and 52 times before it would be better for the environment than an old-fashioned plastic grocery bag.

Is that likely to happen?

Maybe for some, but most likely not for most of us.

The study on how often “reusable” bags need to be used wasn’t conducted by a right-wing think tank but rather the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Unlike so many of our environmentalists, they laid the facts on the line rather than trying to put forward politics as science.

Did you know that for an organic cotton bag to have a lower environmental impact than a plastic grocery bag, it would need to be used 2,000 times?



If you want to use an organic cotton bag for your shopping, knock yourself out but know that the construction of that bag comes with a cost — environmental and otherwise. For far too long, we’ve taken hardline positions that don’t recognize the reality of the situation.

Plastic is always bad, even paper bags are bad to some. The sturdier “reusable” plastic bags are obviously considered better, according to our policymakers and green-oriented corporations, even if the total environmental impact is bigger than a plastic shopping bag.

It’s a kind of green virtue signalling.

It would have been more than 20 years ago when I was interviewing an honest environmental expert on the issue of what kind of shopping bag is best. At that point, the debate was whether paper or plastic bags were best.


“It depends,” said my expert.

He went on to detail that factors such as the weight of the bag, how far it was being shipped, whether it could be reused — all played into the environmental impact.

We don’t get thoughtful analysis like that these days; we get declarations that companies will show their green bona fides by banning shopping bags, except the “reusable” kind that they will charge you for and make a handy profit on.

For the 25 “reusable” grocery bags sitting in my front closet — never mind the half dozen in the trunk of my car — they would have to be used between 1,125 and 1,300 times to be an environmental benefit.

There is nothing wrong with using a “reusable” bag if you want to, but enforcing it by government or corporate edict isn’t the win advocates claim it is.

Let’s drop the dogma and get back to reality.
something no one asked for. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Snake species named in honour of Leonardo DiCaprio
Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Oct 27, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 1 minute read

The DiCaprio's Himalayan snake, AKA the Anguiculus dicaprioi snake, is named in honour of Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio.
The DiCaprio's Himalayan snake, AKA the Anguiculus dicaprioi snake, is named in honour of Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio. Photo by SCREEN GRAB /Vipul Ramanuj
In case being a handsome Hollywood movie star wasn’t enough, Leonardo DiCaprio now has a species of snake named in his honour.


Researchers found the reptile in the western Himalayas in the summer of 2020, the Miami Herald reported, citing an “ongoing study” published by nature.com on Monday, Oct. 21.

Scientists caught a few of the copper-coloured snakes with dozens of teeth and analyzed their DNA, finding that, although the serpent had familiar traits of other snakes, it was an entirely new species – Anguiculus dicaprioi, or DiCaprio’s Himalayan snake.

The DiCaprio’s snakes are considered small, reaching lengths of only 56 centimetres. They have “short” heads, “large” nostrils, and many teeth.

The newly-discovered species can be identified by a “faint” grey band, which appears as a “collar” around the reptile’s neck.


The snake’s name was an obvious choice, researchers said, because the “American actor, film producer, and environmentalist (is someone) who has been actively involved in creating awareness about global climate change (and) increased biodiversity loss.”

The species was found “basking” on the roads of muddy mountains and “remained motionless until caught and made no attempts to bite.”

DiCaprio’s Himalayan snakes can survive elevations of about 1,850 metres, the researchers said.


According to the published findings, the new species has been found in Nepal and the neighboring Indian states of Himachal Pradesh.

Speaking to people.com at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2016 for his documentary The Ivory Game, DiCaprio explained how he got into environmental activism.

“At a young age, I was very saddened by species that had become extinct by the result of man-made activity, and so that led me on a long sort of journey to get me involved in environmental issues,” the Oscar winner said at the time.
1730300665730.png
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Toronto named Canada's 'rattiest' city by Orkin
Author of the article:Jane Stevenson
Published Oct 29, 2024 • Last updated 3 days ago • 1 minute read

Toronto has won the rat race. It has the gross distinction of being Canada’s “rattiest city,” according to Orkin Canada.
Toronto has won the rat race. It has the gross distinction of being Canada’s “rattiest city,” according to Orkin Canada.
Toronto has won the rat race.


The city has the gross distinction of being Canada’s “rattiest city,” according to pest control company Orkin Canada.

While Toronto had the dubious distinction of placing first, Vancouver nabbed second spot and Montreal and Halifax were also on the top-25 list.

Eight Ontario cities made it onto the list, including Mississauga (6), Scarborough (9), Ottawa (12), Sudbury(17) Brampton (20), Hamilton (21), and Etobicoke (23).

The rankings are based on the number of commercial and residential rodent (rat and mice) treatments that Orkin Canada carried out from Aug. 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024.

The company says there are steps you can take to reduce rats, including eliminating places for them to harbour, cutting off water and food sources, and sealing entry points.

Here’s Orkin Canada’s ranking of the rattiest cities:

1. Toronto

2. Vancouver

3. Kelowna

4. Burnaby

5. Victoria

6. Mississauga

7. Richmond

8. Surrey

9. Scarborough

10. St. John’s

11. Moncton

12. Ottawa

13. Winnipeg

14. Vernon

15. Langley

16. Coquitlam

17. Sudbury

18. Abbotsford

19. Delta

20. Brampton

21. Hamilton

22. Port Coquitlam

23. Etobicoke

24. Montreal

25. Halifax
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
She had a cockroach in her ear. She'll know soon if her landlord must compensate her
The London, Ont. woman had to have the cockroach surgically removed from her ear

Author of the article:Randy Richmond
Published Nov 01, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 4 minute read

A London woman who had a cockroach surgically removed from her ear should know within a month if she’ll receive compensation from her landlord, London’s public housing agency.


At a Landlord and Tenant Board hearing Thursday, Brandi Bulanda described the toll of her final defeat after months of battling cockroaches in her unit at a London and Middlesex Community Housing (LMCH) apartment on Wharncliffe Road.

“My anxiety went through the roof. I couldn’t sleep,” she said.

She had to give up her job and volunteer work, get rid of her furniture and appliances, and move into her mother’s basement, Bulanda testified.

“I tried so hard to get up on my feet. I thought I had made it and it got ripped out from me,” the once homeless Bulanda, now six years sober, said through tears.

“My independence, my stability, my mental state, my anxiety, my health, my involvement with community. It felt like I was being bashed down constantly. I’m still trying to pay off a debt, completely financially torn.”


LMCH failed to provide her with a habitable unit, and should compensate her for the lost property and lost wages, and the money she spent battling the bugs, about $20,000 in total, her representative and paralegal Geoffrey Hume told the tribunal.

“She suffered considerable hardship both financially and emotionally. We’re not looking to punish LMCH, but we do want to make Ms. Bulanda whole from this experience,” he said.

“It should be no surprise she acted the way she did. She needed to leave the unit, she needed to get rid of the offending items. Her mental health was compromised, her job was compromised by the situation.”

But LMCH’s representative argued the agency did what it could to repair the cosmetic problems at the unit, and there was no reason for Bulanda to get rid of her items.


“She failed to demonstrate how these minor pest issues caused the amount of damage claimed to furniture,” paralegal Preston Haynes said.



Bulanda admitted spraying her appliances damaged them, and no one at LMCH advised her that was necessary, he added.

Each time a pest issue was raised, “the landlord did act in a prompt manner,” Haynes said.

Adjudicator Rema El-Tawil reserved her decision on Bulanda’s application for compensation and said she’d have a ruling within 30 days.

Testimony at the hearing reiterated the challenges facing public housing and tenants in London. Public housing officials described how LMCH has a two- to 10-year waiting list, depending on the circumstances of applicants, and struggles to stay on top of urgent and other repairs in its more than 3,000 units that often are occupied by people struggling with addiction and mental health issues.


In this case, there was no indication Bulanda was anything but a good tenant. She moved to a unit in December 2022 and said she called LMCH immediately about cockroaches.

A move-in report recorded a hole in the kitchen wall behind the stove, but an inspection found “no visible concerns,” the tribunal heard.


For the next several months, she continued to contact LMCH about cockroaches, Bulanda testified.

Sometimes pest control came in and sprayed or left traps, but the hole in the wall and holes near the baseboards weren’t repaired, she testified.

Documents provided at the hearing showed pest control visited the unit in December after the first complaint, in May and in August, after Bulanda had to undergo surgery.


Each report termed the infestation minor.

Bulanda testified she took it upon herself to weatherstrip her hallway and balcony doors, spread powder throughout her unit and install mesh in her vents.

She tried in the spring of 2023 to get the holes in her wall and in the baseboards fixed but was told they weren’t priorities, Bulanda testified.

“That was the end of it. I just felt I was done. I had to live with cockroaches,” she said.

Pests aren’t considered urgent matters for a staff of seven to nine people trying to handle major fire safety, water, heating and other issues, LMCH’s property manager Kacper Obrzazgiewicz testified.

“There are pest issues in every building I’ve ever worked in,” he said.

He acknowledged the hole in the wall of Bulanda’s unit was a “contributing factor” to the presence of cockroaches.


Hume took LMHC to task for its approach to pest control, spraying without addressing other causes.

“We heard testimony that many, many buildings have cockroach infestations that are long standing. It’s unreasonable to keep doing the same thing that hasn’t been working,” he said.

It wasn’t until late August, after Bulanda’s medical incident, that LMCH repaired the hole in the wall, sealed gaps around plumbing and fixed the bathroom floor.


Bulanda described for the hearing how she went to sleep one night in the summer of 2023, troubled by a loss of hearing and something plugging in her ear that she couldn’t clean out with peroxide.

The next day she woke up and went to her doctor, who found the cockroach embedded in her ear canal, Bulanda testified, with a doctor’s note as evidence.


Horrified and distraught, she gave up sleeping in her unit about a week later and began sleeping on the couch in her mother’s basement, where she remains, Bulanda testified.

She sprayed and bagged her appliances and other items and took them to a storage unit, not realizing the spray would ruin the electronics, Bulanda testified.

After a month, she gave up the unit and the appliances because she was no longer working and couldn’t afford to rent the unit anymore, Bulanda said.

She also disposed of her furniture, fearful it was infested with more cockroaches and their eggs.

And she had to take three months off work, losing about $3,000 in pay, Bulanda said.

Bulanda testified she kept her clothes, but lost so much weight from stress that none of them fit and had to be replaced.

rrichmond@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Volcanic eruption burns houses in Indonesia, killing at least 10 people
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Jakobus Herin
Published Nov 04, 2024 • 2 minute read

In this photo made available by Indonesia's Center for Volcanology and Geological Disaster Mitigation Agency (PVMBG) of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, the sky glows from the eruption of Mount Lewotobi Laki-Laki early Monday, Nov. 4, 2024, in East Flores, Indonesia. (PVMBG via AP)
In this photo made available by Indonesia's Center for Volcanology and Geological Disaster Mitigation Agency (PVMBG) of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, the sky glows from the eruption of Mount Lewotobi Laki-Laki early Monday, Nov. 4, 2024, in East Flores, Indonesia. (PVMBG via AP) THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
MAUMERE, Indonesia (AP) — Indonesia’s National Disaster Management Agency said Monday that at least 10 people have died as a series of volcanic eruptions widens on the remote island of Flores.


The eruption at Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki around midnight spewed thick brownish ash as high as 2,000 meters (6,500 feet) into the air and hot ashes hit several villages, burning down houses including a convent of Catholic nuns, said Firman Yosef, an official at the Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki monitoring post.

He said volcanic material was thrown up to 6 kilometers (3.7 miles) from its crater, blanketing nearby villages and towns with tons of volcanic debris and forcing residents to flee.

Rescuers were still searching for more bodies buried under collapsed houses, said Abdul Muhari, the National Disaster Management Agency’s spokesperson. Muhari said all the bodies, including a child, were found with a 4-kilometer (2.4 mile) radius of the crater.


He said at least 10,000 people have been affected by the eruption in six villages of Wulanggitang District, and four villages in Ile Bura district. Some have fled to relatives’ houses while the local government is readying schools to use as temporary shelters.

The country’s volcano monitoring agency increased the volcano’s alert status to the highest level and more than doubled the exclusion zone to a 7-kilometer (4.3-mile) radius after midnight on Monday as eruptions became more frequent.

A nun in Hokeng village died and another was missing, said Agusta Palma, the head of the Saint Gabriel Foundation that oversees convents on the majority-Catholic island.

“Our nuns ran out in panic under a rain of volcanic ash in the darkness,” Palma said.


Photos and videos circulated on social media showed tons of volcanic debris covering houses up to their rooftops in villages like Hokeng, where hot volcanic material set fire to houses.

Lewotobi Laki-laki is one of a pair of stratovolcanoes in the East Flores district of East Nusa Tenggara province known locally as the husband — “Laki-laki” means man — and wife mountains. Its mate is Lewotobi Perempuan, or woman.

About 6,500 people were evacuated in January after Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki began erupting, spewing thick clouds and forcing the government to close the island’s Frans Seda Airport. No casualties or major damage were reported, but the airport has remained closed since then due to seismic activity.

In a video conference on Monday, Muhammad Wafid, the head of Geology Agency at the Energy and Mineral Resources ministry said there was a different character between January’s eruption and Monday’s eruption due to a blockage of magma in the crater, which reduced detectible seismic activity while building up pressure.


“The eruptions that occurred since Friday were due to the accumulation of hidden energy,” Wafid said.

It’s Indonesia’s second volcanic eruption in as many weeks. West Sumatra province’s Mount Marapi, one of the country’s most active volcanos, erupted on Oct. 27, spewing thick columns of ash at least three times and blanketing nearby villages with debris, but no casualties were reported.

Lewotobi Laki-laki is one of the 120 active volcanoes in Indonesia, an archipelago of 280 million people. The country is prone to earthquakes, landslides and volcanic activity because it sits along the “Ring of Fire,” a horseshoe-shaped series of seismic fault lines around the Pacific Ocean.
1730860439408.png
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Indonesia’s volcanic eruption grounds international flights on Bali
The volcano shot up ash at least 17 times on Tuesday

Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Firdia Lisnawati And Niniek Karmini
Published Nov 13, 2024 • 3 minute read

Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki spews ash
Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki spews ash and smoke during an eruption as seen from Lewolaga village in Titihena, East Nusa Tenggara, on November 13, 2024. Photo by ARNOLD WELIANTO /AFP
DENPASAR, Indonesia — Several international airlines canceled flights to and from Indonesia’s tourist island of Bali on Wednesday as an ongoing volcanic eruption left travelers stranded at airports.


Tourists told The Associated Press that they have been stuck at Bali’s airport since Tuesday after their flights were suddenly canceled.

“The airline did not provide accommodation, leaving us stranded at this airport,” said Charlie Austin from Perth, Australia, who was on vacation in Bali with his family.

Another Australian tourist, Issabella Butler, opted to find another airline that could fly her home.

“The important thing is that we have to be able to get out of here,” she said.

Media reports said that thousands of people were stranded at airports in Indonesia and Australia, but an exact number wasn’t given.

Indonesia’s Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki volcano on the remote island of Flores in East Nusa Tenggara province spewed towering columns of hot ash high into the air since its initial huge eruption on Nov. 4 killed nine people and injured dozens of others.


The 1,584-meter (5,197-foot) volcano shot up ash at least 17 times on Tuesday, with the largest column recorded at 9 kilometers (5 1/2 miles) high, the Center for Volcanology and Geological Disaster Mitigation said in a statement.

Authorities on Tuesday expanded the danger zone as the volcano erupted again to 9 kilometers (5 1/2 miles) as volcanic materials, including smoldering rocks, lava, and hot, thumb-size fragments of gravel and ash, were thrown up to 8 kilometers (5 miles) from the crater since Friday.

The activity at the volcano has disturbed flights at Bali’s I Gusti Ngurah Rai international airport since the eruption started, airport general manager Ahmad Syaugi Shahab said. Over the past four days, 84 flights, including 36 scheduled to depart and 48 due to arrive, were affected.


Shahab said that at least 26 domestic flights and 64 overseas ones were canceled on Wednesday alone, including airlines from Singapore, Hong Kong, Qatar, India and Malaysia. For these cancellations, the airlines were offering travelers a refund, or to reschedule or reroute, he said.

Three Australian airlines have also canceled or delayed a number of flights. Jetstar has paused its flights to Bali until at least Thursday, it said on its website, saying it was “currently not safe” to operate the route.

Virgin Australia’s website showed 10 services to and from Bali were canceled on Wednesday. Qantas said it has delayed three flights. Some airlines are offering fare refunds for upcoming Bali flights to passengers who don’t want to travel.


Air New Zealand canceled a flight to Denpasar scheduled for Wednesday and a return service to Auckland due to depart Bali on Thursday. Passengers would be rebooked and the airline would continue to monitor the movement of ash in the coming days, Chief Operating Officer Alex Marren said.

Korean Air said two of its flights headed to Bali were forced to turn back because of volcanic ash caused by the eruption.

The airline said Wednesday that the two flights — carrying about 400 passengers combined — that departed South Korea’s Incheon international airport on Tuesday turned back toward the origin departure a few hours later, following forecasts that said Bali’s Ngurah Rai airport could be affected by the volcanic ash. The two planes arrived in Incheon early Wednesday.


About 6,500 people were evacuated in January after Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki began erupting, spewing thick clouds and forcing the government to close the island’s Fransiskus Xaverius Seda Airport. No casualties or major damage were reported, but the airport has remained closed because of seismic activity.

Three other airports in neighboring districts of Ende, Larantuka and Bajawa have been closed since Monday after Indonesia’s Air Navigation issued a safety warning because of volcanic ash.

Lewotobi Laki Laki is one of a pair of stratovolcanoes in the East Flores district of East Nusa Tenggara province, known locally as the husband-and-wife mountains. “Laki laki” means man, while its mate is Lewotobi Perempuan, or woman. It’s one of the 120 active volcanoes in Indonesia, an archipelago of 280 million people.

The country is prone to earthquakes, landslides and volcanic activity because it sits along the “Ring of Fire,” a horseshoe-shaped series of seismic fault lines around the Pacific Ocean.
1731644823545.png
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
California researchers discover mysterious, gelatinous new sea slug
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Published Nov 13, 2024 • 1 minute read

This undated photo, provided by Monterey Bay Aquarium and Research Institute, shows a mystery mollusc (Bathydevius caudactylus) observed by MBARI's remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Tiburon in the outer Monterey Canyon at a depth of approximately 1,550 metres.
This undated photo, provided by Monterey Bay Aquarium and Research Institute, shows a mystery mollusc (Bathydevius caudactylus) observed by MBARI's remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Tiburon in the outer Monterey Canyon at a depth of approximately 1,550 metres. Photo by MBARI /THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
MONTEREY, Calif. — More than two decades after spotting a mysterious, gelatinous, bioluminescent creature swimming in the deep sea, California researchers this week announced that it is a new species of sea slug.


The Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute posted video online of the new sea slug floating gently in the depths.

Using a remote vehicle, scientists with the institute first noticed what they called a “mystery mollusc” in February 2000 at a depth of 8,576 feet (2,614 metres) in the Pacific.

“With a voluminous hooded structure at one end, a flat tail fringed with numerous finger-like projections at the other, and colorful internal organs in between, the team initially struggled to place this animal in a group,” the institute said in a statement Tuesday.

After reviewing more than 150 sightings of the creature and studying it in a lab, researchers determined it was a new type of nudibranch, or sea slug. It lives in the so-called midnight zone, an area of deep ocean known for “frigid temperatures, inky darkness, and crushing pressure,” the statement said.

The findings were published in the journal Deep-Sea Research Part I.
1731646433725.png
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
'Toxic Hall of Shame' fills up as major brands get failing grade for chemical use
Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Nov 17, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 2 minute read

A report reveals that most retailers in Canada and the U.S. are falling short when it comes to ensuring that products they sell are made with the safest chemicals and materials.
A report reveals that most retailers in Canada and the U.S. are falling short when it comes to ensuring that products they sell are made with the safest chemicals and materials.
A toxic-free future is not around the corner.


Not judging by the details shared in a new report by Toxic-Free Future, a non-profit consumer product safety organization.

The report reveals that most retailers in Canada and the U.S. are falling short when it comes to ensuring that products they sell are made with the safest chemicals and materials.

Only 50 of the brands graded on their Retailer Report Card scored As, while 17 failed completely.

“With PFAS in our drinking water and toxics found in black plastic spatulas, it is shocking how little retailers are doing to help solve this health crisis linked to hazardous chemicals and plastics in consumer products,” Cheri Peele, senior project manager for Toxic-Free Future, said in a news release.

Added Mike Schade, director of Toxic-Free Future’s Mind the Store program: “Simply banning toxic chemicals isn’t enough — retailers must go further to ensure that replacements are truly safer for consumers, communities and workers.”


Toxic-Free has compiled its Retailer Report Card since 2016 to provide consumers with an extensive assessment of retailer’s policies and programs for hazardous chemicals and plastics.

The most recent report scored the practices and policies of the 50 largest retailers in North America, representing 160 businesses and more than 200,000 outlets selling billions of dollars’ worth of products.

Toxic-Free suggested that, due to their size, these retailers hold the market power to demand and drive toxic chemicals and plastics out of the supply chain.


The average grade was a D+ and restaurant chains and dollar stores ranked the lowest. Seventeen retailers earned a failing grade and a spot in the “Toxic Hall of Shame.”


Those earning failing grades included Chipotle, Subway, Trader Joe’s, Publix, McDonald’s, Macy’s, 7-Eleven, Five Below, LL Flooring (Lumber Liquidators), Nordstrom, Sally Beauty, Sherwin-Williams and Canadian supermarket chain Sobeys.

Others scoring an F were Inspire Brands (Arby’s parent company), Baskin-Robbins, Buffalo Wild Wings, Dunkin’, Jimmy John’s and Sonic, along with Yum! Brands, which owns KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut.

Ahold Delhaize, which owns Stop & Shop, and Alimentation Couche-Tard, which owns Circle K, also failed.

On the flipside, the four retailers who earned an A were Apple, Sephora, Target and Walmart. Whole Foods Market, IKEA and Ulta scored Bs. (Ulta also received high marks for improvement, as the brand doubled its score from 2021 to 2024.)


Amazon scored middle of the road with a C.



Toxic-Free found that more than half of the retailers they analyzed were banning some dangerous chemical and harmful plastics, while 68% are reducing things such as PVC and PFAS, known as “forever chemicals.”

Each brand was rated on metrics, and their combined scores determined their final grades.

“It’s alarming that more than half of the companies in the Retailer Report Card don’t ask suppliers for ingredient information,” Caroline Boden, director of shareholder advocacy at Mercy Investment Services, said.

“This lack of transparency puts consumers, businesses, and shareholders at risk.”
 

55Mercury

rigid member
May 31, 2007
4,379
1,054
113
Target and Walmart I suspect bought their 'A' grades in this report. I mean seriously, do they carry anything that's not made in China?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Fossilized dinosaur feces and vomit help scientists reconstruct the creatures’ rise
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Adithi Ramakrishnan
Published Nov 27, 2024 • 1 minute read

This illustration provided by Marcin Ambrozik shows plant-eating dinosaurs in Poland during the Early Jurassic period.
This illustration provided by Marcin Ambrozik shows plant-eating dinosaurs in Poland during the Early Jurassic period. Photo by Marcin Ambrozik via AP
NEW YORK — Using fossilized feces and vomit samples from Poland, scientists have reconstructed how dinosaurs came to dominate the Earth millions of years ago.


Researchers aren’t sure whether dinosaurs’ rise over the course of 30 million years happened because of luck, skill, climate or some combination. But they came away knowing this: “It was not a sudden thing,” said study co-author Martin Qvarnström from Uppsala University.

The new study, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, analyzed hundreds of dino droppings to reconstruct who was eating whom 200 million years ago.

The first dinosaurs were go-getters, Qvarnström said, eating whatever they could — including insects, fish and plants.

When climate conditions changed, they were quick to adapt. Plant-eating dinosaurs, for example, ate a greater variety of greens than other vegetarians of the time, so it was easier to expand their palates when wetter conditions gave rise to new plant species.


This undated photo provided by Grzegorz Niedzwiedzki shows fossilized plant-eating dinosaur poop found in the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland.
This undated photo provided by Grzegorz Niedzwiedzki shows fossilized plant-eating dinosaur poop found in the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland. Photo by Grzegorz Niedzwiedzki via AP
Since the study’s findings were limited to Polish fossils, Qvarnström said he’d like to see if their ideas hold steady against fossil records from around the world.

It’s not uncommon for scientists to study ancient fecal matter to understand creatures of the past, said Emma Dunne, a paleobiologist at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg. But fossilized feces can resemble blobs or chunks of rock, and they are not always found near fossils of the animal that made them — which makes it hard for scientists to know where they came from.

In this study, researchers found fish scales, insect bits and bone shards nestled within the droppings.

“They are a really unassuming, quite plain part of the background,” said Dunne, who was not involved with the new research. “But they hold so much delicate, fine information.”

— The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
dinosaur-illustration[1].jpg

 

Attachments

  • dinosaur-poop[1].jpg
    dinosaur-poop[1].jpg
    245.6 KB · Views: 10

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Can sitting too close to a screen damage your eyesight?
Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Marlene Cimons
Published Nov 28, 2024 • 4 minute read

Is it true that sitting too close to a television will damage your eyes?


The science: Baby boomers – actually anyone 60 or older – repeatedly heard this warning from their mothers growing up.

Turns out, Mom was on to something. Watching a screen up close for long periods of time will affect eyesight. But the danger now comes from smartphones, tablets and computers.

“Your mother was right, but the screen has changed,” said Marcela Estrada, an assistant professor of ophthalmology at the University of California at Davis. “And today, every kid has a screen.”

Children, especially those ages 7 to 15, have the highest risk for eye problems such as myopia or nearsightedness, but young and older adults may also face eye issues.

Since the introduction of large flat-screen TVs, the little cabinet TVs have become obsolete, and the risks from TV screens are not as great. Large-screen TVs make it harder to see everything on the full screen if you sit too close, so viewers tend to keep their distance, reducing potential harm.


But tablets, smartphones and computers are often less than an arm’s length away, which is too close to our eyes, experts said.

“Everybody in school and at home are now on their phones and tablets, and more time spent doing this ‘near work’ can increase the incidence of myopia,” said Masih Ahmed, an assistant professor of ophthalmology at the Baylor College of Medicine. “This is occurring mainly in kids because that’s when the eye is developing the most.”

Myopia means you can see things clearly that are near, but have trouble seeing objects that are farther away. In some cases, this can lead to serious eye problems later, experts said.

Eyes turn inward while closely viewing a screen, causing a muscle behind the iris of the eye – the ciliary body – to contract, changing the shape of the lens. This results in myopia.


“The eye lens gets fatter,” Estrada said. “When you consistently focus too close, the eye lens spends more time accommodating and changes its shape to focus the image on your retina. If you do this too much, then you will encourage your eye to grow too fast,” which promotes myopia.

“Your eyes stop growing between ages 18 and 25, so it’s especially important to pay attention to this issue in younger children,” said Daniel Cyr, a pediatric ophthalmologist at Stony Brook Medicine. “The younger they’re found to be myopic, the more likely it is they will become ‘highly’ myopic, which is an extreme form of nearsightedness – they can only see things that are right in front of their faces, within a foot – which puts them at greater risk for degenerative eye conditions such as vision loss, retinal detachment, cataracts and glaucoma.”


There also are genetic conditions such as Stickler syndrome and Marfan syndrome that cause “high myopia,” Estrada said. Also, having one parent with myopia increases the risk, especially if that parent has extreme myopia. And if both parents are myopic, the risk is higher and the “degree of myopia tends be worse,” she said.

Myopia can’t be reversed or cured, and children can’t “outgrow” it, but it can be corrected with eyeglasses or contact lenses and, for adults, laser surgery, according to the National Eye Institute.

Young adults – those in their early 20s – can also have late myopic progression with excessive near work, Estrada said. And after reaching their 40s, adults can develop presbyopia – when the lens is less able to bend to focus on things. That age group will feel asthenopia or significantly more eyestrain or fatigue, and some will develop diplopia or double vision, from an inability to sustain near focus, she said.


What else you should know
There are a few steps parents can take to reduce the risk of their child developing myopia or it getting worse, experts said.

Limit home screen time for nonschool work to one hour or less every day. “This may be tough for a teenager, but the important time is during the younger years when you still have some control over their use of these devices,” Cyr said.

Ask children to hold the screen at least an arm’s length away, Estrada said.

Put the tablet in a heavy case, “which makes it harder for a child to hold for long periods of time,” or set it on a stand on a desk, Estrada recommended.

Have them spend time outside. “Two hours a day outside is a good preventive,” against myopia, Estrada said. Growing evidence suggests that increasing a child’s time outdoors helps prevent the onset of myopia, although some research finds it unlikely to slow its progression in eyes that already are myopic. Experts aren’t sure why sunshine helps, “but there is something about being in the daylight,” Ahmed said. Perhaps “you are not in an enclosed visual space, and objects are at” more of a distance. Or, Estrada said, “it could just be that being outdoors relaxes the work of the eyes.”


Get at least one professional eye exam for every child, including babies, before they reach kindergarten age, Cyr said. “With infants, we have tools that take a picture of a child’s eye that measures refractive errors, meaning whether child’s eye needs correction,” he said. “Pediatricians have tools to screen them. If they fail, they should go to a pediatric ophthalmologist.”

The bottom line: Viewing a screen up close can affect eyesight, especially in young children. Some older adults feel eye fatigue or develop double vision.

“The sweet spot where high near tasking probably won’t harm your eyes, other than dry eye symptoms, is between the ages of 25 to 45. Outside of that, don’t sit too close to the TV or screen,” Estrada said.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Muddy footprints suggest 2 species of early humans were neighbours in Kenya 1.5 million years ago
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Christina Larson
Published Nov 28, 2024 • 2 minute read

Scientists study fossil footprints for clues about co-existing species of early human ancestors at the excavation site on the eastern side of Lake Turkana in northern Kenya, in 2022.
Scientists study fossil footprints for clues about co-existing species of early human ancestors at the excavation site on the eastern side of Lake Turkana in northern Kenya, in 2022. Photo by Neil Thomas Roach via AP
WASHINGTON — Muddy footprints left on a Kenyan lakeside suggest two of our early human ancestors were nearby neighbours some 1.5 million years ago.


The footprints were left in the mud by two different species “within a matter of hours, or at most days,” said paleontologist Louise Leakey, co-author of the research published Thursday in the journal Science.

Scientists previously knew from fossil remains that these two extinct branches of the human evolutionary tree — called Homo erectus and Paranthropus boisei — lived about the same time in the Turkana Basin.

But dating fossils is not exact. “It’s plus or minus a few thousand years,” said paleontologist William Harcourt-Smith of Lehman College and the American Museum of Natural History in New York, who was not involved in the study.

Yet with fossil footprints, “there’s an actual moment in time preserved,” he said. “It’s an amazing discovery.”


Scientists study fossil footprints for clues about co-existing species of early human ancestors at the excavation site on the eastern side of Lake Turkana in northern Kenya, in 2022.
Scientists study fossil footprints for clues about co-existing species of early human ancestors at the excavation site on the eastern side of Lake Turkana in northern Kenya, in 2022. Photo by Neil Thomas Roach via AP
The tracks of fossil footprints were uncovered in 2021 in what is today Koobi Fora, Kenya, said Leaky, who is based at New York’s Stony Brook University.

Whether the two individuals passed by the eastern side of Lake Turkana at the same time — or a day or two apart — they likely knew of each other’s existence, said study co-author Kevin Hatala, a paleoanthropologist at Chatham University in Pittsburgh.

“They probably saw each other, probably knew each other was there and probably influenced each other in some way,” he said.

Scientists were able to distinguish between the two species because of the shape of the footprints, which holds clues to the anatomy of the foot and how it’s being used.

H. erectus appeared to be walking similar to how modern humans walk — striking the ground heel first, then rolling weight over the ball of the foot and toes and pushing off again.


The other species, which was also walking upright, was moving “in a different way from anything else we’ve seen before, anywhere else,” said co-author Erin Marie Williams-Hatala, a human evolutionary anatomist at Chatham.

Among other details, the footprints suggest more mobility in their big toe, compared to H. erectus or modern humans, said Hatala.

Our common primate ancestors probably had hands and feet adapted for grasping branches, but over time the feet of human ancestors evolved to enable walking upright, researchers say.

The new study adds to a growing body of research that implies this transformation to bipedalism — walking on two feet — didn’t happen at a single moment, in a single way.

Rather, there may have been a variety of ways that early humans learned to walk, run, stumble and slide on prehistoric muddy slopes.

“It turns out, there are different gait mechanics — different ways of being bipedal,” said Harcourt-Smith.
1732968377775.png1732968503631.png