Science & Environment

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,360
3,246
113
Serious infections linked to dementia risk, study shows
Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Richard Sima, The Washington Post
Published Oct 18, 2024 • 5 minute read

Getting sick feels bad in the moment and may affect your brain in the longer term.


A new study published in Nature Aging adds to growing evidence that severe infections, including flu, herpes and respiratory tract infections, are linked to accelerated brain atrophy and increased risk of dementia years later. It also hints at the biological drivers that may contribute to neurodegenerative disease.

The current research is a “leap beyond previous studies that had already associated infection with susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease” and provides a “useful dataset,” said Rudy Tanzi, a professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and the director of the McCance Center for Brain Health at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Other recent studies have found that the flu shot and the shingles vaccine reduce the risk of subsequent dementia in those who get them. Severe infections have also been linked to subsequent strokes and heart attacks.


“Vaccines are going to be the most protection against both the acute infection as well as these post-infectious effects,” said Kristen Funk, an assistant professor of biological sciences at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte who studies neuroinflammation in neuroinfectious and neurodegenerative diseases.

Severe infections linked to brain atrophy and dementia
“The idea that infections can influence brain health for some people has been a no-brainer, especially those who themselves experienced infections,” said Keenan Walker, a tenure-track investigator and the director of the Multimodal Imaging of Neurodegenerative Disease Unit at the National Institute on Aging.

Even small infections can change the way we think and behave. More-severe infections can, in the short term, result in delirium, which may be associated with long-term cognitive problems, Walker said. “Big infection, big immune response – not good for the brain,” he said.


The hypothesis that infections may play a role in neurodegenerative diseases has been around, albeit more on the fringes, Walker said. That changed with the coronavirus pandemic and evidence of the lasting cognitive costs of long covid, which invigorated interest in the field.

Growing evidence suggests that the link “doesn’t seem to be specific to any type of infection, whether it be bacterial or viral,” said Walker, who was an author of the study.

Walker and his colleagues relied on data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, one of the longest-running studies of human aging in the United States. They also tracked how brain volume changed in 982 cognitively normal adults, with or without a history of infection, by taking repeated neuroimaging, starting in 2009. About 43 percent of participants had no history of infections.


Out of the 15 types of infections investigated, six – including flu, herpes, respiratory tract infections and skin infections – were associated with accelerated loss of brain volume. Brain atrophy was particularly pronounced in the temporal lobe, an area containing the hippocampus, which is important for memory and implicated in Alzheimer’s disease.

“They really found that there’s a range of infections that are associated with this brain atrophy, associated with this cognitive decline,” said Funk, who was not involved in the study.


In turn, most of these infections associated with brain atrophy seem to be risk factors for dementia, according to the researchers’ analyses of the UK Biobank data of 495,896 subjects and a Finnish dataset of 273,132 subjects.


They found that having a history of infections was associated with an increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease years later. The increased risk was even higher for vascular dementia, which is the second-most-common dementia diagnosis after Alzheimer’s disease and caused by restriction of blood to the brain.

Biological links between brain and infections
Scientists still do not understand how infections are biologically linked to increased dementia risk. But there are hints in the immune system.

In the current study, people with a history of infections also had changes to 260 immune-related proteins out of the 942 researchers tested from blood samples. A subset of 35 proteins was also associated with brain-volume changes. Some proteins seemed pathogenic and linked to reduced brain volume, while others were protective.


In general, infections were associated with increases in pathogenic proteins and decreases in protective ones.

“You might be seeing a loss of protection, or some neuroprotection that was never there,” Walker said.

This study “does shed some light on potential biological pathways that actually lead to the increase in dementia risk after severe infections,” said Charlotte Warren-Gash, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who was not involved in the study.

Better understanding of the proteins involved may one day lead to better targeting of the immune system.

But researchers cautioned that this study is just one more piece in the puzzle of dementia and shows correlations between infections, immune-related proteins and neurological effects, but not causation.


The study also does not adequately address how amyloid beta plaques and tau tangles, key biological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease, play into the link between infections and dementia, Tanzi said.

More-minor infections are not cause for alarm since the data was drawn from patients who had a hospital record of their infections, indicating more-severe cases, experts say.

Previous research conducted by Warren-Gash and her colleagues suggests that weaker infections increased the risk of subsequent dementia by about 2 percent, while infections requiring hospitalizations almost doubled dementia risk.

“We all get infections all the time,” Funk said. “It’s not necessarily a doomsday.”

Advice for reducing severe infections and dementia risk

The 2024 Lancet Commission report on dementia lays out 14 modifiable risk factors, which together account for 45 percent of dementia cases. To cut dementia risk and lengthen our cognitive health spans, studies suggest steps such as staying socially connected, moderating alcohol intake and addressing hearing loss.

Reducing the risk for serious infections remains important for both short-term and long-term health, experts say.

Vaccinations are the best way to prevent severe infections. Getting the flu and covid-19 shots can reduce complications, hospitalizations and the number of deaths from the viral infections. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also recommends the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine for everyone over 75 years old, and for those over 60 who are at increased risk for severe RSV. The CDC anticipates about 800,000 hospitalizations from flu, covid and RSV this year.

In addition, the CDC recommends two doses of the shingles vaccine for everyone 50 and older.

Other health practices such as wearing a mask and properly washing your hands also help reduce infection risk.

“The best thing you can do other than responding to an infection with symptomatic care after they occur is preventing them in the first place,” Walker said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nallapati

nallapati

New Member
Sep 12, 2018
7
2
3
Serious infections linked to dementia risk, study shows
Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Richard Sima, The Washington Post
Published Oct 18, 2024 • 5 minute read

Getting sick feels bad in the moment and may affect your brain in the longer term.


A new study published in Nature Aging adds to growing evidence that severe infections, including flu, herpes and respiratory tract infections, are linked to accelerated brain atrophy and increased risk of dementia years later. It also hints at the biological drivers that may contribute to neurodegenerative disease.

The current research is a “leap beyond previous studies that had already associated infection with susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease” and provides a “useful dataset,” said Rudy Tanzi, a professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and the director of the McCance Center for Brain Health at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Other recent studies have found that the flu shot and the shingles vaccine reduce the risk of subsequent dementia in those who get them. Severe infections have also been linked to subsequent strokes and heart attacks.


“Vaccines are going to be the most protection against both the acute infection as well as these post-infectious effects,” said Kristen Funk, an assistant professor of biological sciences at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte who studies neuroinflammation in neuroinfectious and neurodegenerative diseases.

Severe infections linked to brain atrophy and dementia
“The idea that infections can influence brain health for some people has been a no-brainer, especially those who themselves experienced infections,” said Keenan Walker, a tenure-track investigator and the director of the Multimodal Imaging of Neurodegenerative Disease Unit at the National Institute on Aging.

Even small infections can change the way we think and behave. More-severe infections can, in the short term, result in delirium, which may be associated with long-term cognitive problems, Walker said. “Big infection, big immune response – not good for the brain,” he said.


The hypothesis that infections may play a role in neurodegenerative diseases has been around, albeit more on the fringes, Walker said. That changed with the coronavirus pandemic and evidence of the lasting cognitive costs of long covid, which invigorated interest in the field.

Growing evidence suggests that the link “doesn’t seem to be specific to any type of infection, whether it be bacterial or viral,” said Walker, who was an author of the study.

Walker and his colleagues relied on data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, one of the longest-running studies of human aging in the United States. They also tracked how brain volume changed in 982 cognitively normal adults, with or without a history of infection, by taking repeated neuroimaging, starting in 2009. About 43 percent of participants had no history of infections.


Out of the 15 types of infections investigated, six – including flu, herpes, respiratory tract infections and skin infections – were associated with accelerated loss of brain volume. Brain atrophy was particularly pronounced in the temporal lobe, an area containing the hippocampus, which is important for memory and implicated in Alzheimer’s disease.

“They really found that there’s a range of infections that are associated with this brain atrophy, associated with this cognitive decline,” said Funk, who was not involved in the study.


In turn, most of these infections associated with brain atrophy seem to be risk factors for dementia, according to the researchers’ analyses of the UK Biobank data of 495,896 subjects and a Finnish dataset of 273,132 subjects.


They found that having a history of infections was associated with an increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease years later. The increased risk was even higher for vascular dementia, which is the second-most-common dementia diagnosis after Alzheimer’s disease and caused by restriction of blood to the brain.

Biological links between brain and infections
Scientists still do not understand how infections are biologically linked to increased dementia risk. But there are hints in the immune system.

In the current study, people with a history of infections also had changes to 260 immune-related proteins out of the 942 researchers tested from blood samples. A subset of 35 proteins was also associated with brain-volume changes. Some proteins seemed pathogenic and linked to reduced brain volume, while others were protective.


In general, infections were associated with increases in pathogenic proteins and decreases in protective ones.

“You might be seeing a loss of protection, or some neuroprotection that was never there,” Walker said.

This study “does shed some light on potential biological pathways that actually lead to the increase in dementia risk after severe infections,” said Charlotte Warren-Gash, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who was not involved in the study.

Better understanding of the proteins involved may one day lead to better targeting of the immune system.

But researchers cautioned that this study is just one more piece in the puzzle of dementia and shows correlations between infections, immune-related proteins and neurological effects, but not causation.


The study also does not adequately address how amyloid beta plaques and tau tangles, key biological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease, play into the link between infections and dementia, Tanzi said.

More-minor infections are not cause for alarm since the data was drawn from patients who had a hospital record of their infections, indicating more-severe cases, experts say.

Previous research conducted by Warren-Gash and her colleagues suggests that weaker infections increased the risk of subsequent dementia by about 2 percent, while infections requiring hospitalizations almost doubled dementia risk.

“We all get infections all the time,” Funk said. “It’s not necessarily a doomsday.”

Advice for reducing severe infections and dementia risk

The 2024 Lancet Commission report on dementia lays out 14 modifiable risk factors, which together account for 45 percent of dementia cases. To cut dementia risk and lengthen our cognitive health spans, studies suggest steps such as staying socially connected, moderating alcohol intake and addressing hearing loss.

Reducing the risk for serious infections remains important for both short-term and long-term health, experts say.

Vaccinations are the best way to prevent severe infections. Getting the flu and covid-19 shots can reduce complications, hospitalizations and the number of deaths from the viral infections. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also recommends the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine for everyone over 75 years old, and for those over 60 who are at increased risk for severe RSV. The CDC anticipates about 800,000 hospitalizations from flu, covid and RSV this year.

In addition, the CDC recommends two doses of the shingles vaccine for everyone 50 and older.

Other health practices such as wearing a mask and properly washing your hands also help reduce infection risk.

“The best thing you can do other than responding to an infection with symptomatic care after they occur is preventing them in the first place,” Walker said.
Wow, this study really makes you stop and think! It’s wild to consider that something as simple as getting sick could mess with our brains later on.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,360
3,246
113
Donor wakes up on operating table as doctors prepare to harvest organs
Author of the article:Denette Wilford
Published Oct 18, 2024 • 2 minute read

A petrified organ donor came back to life, “thrashing around” and “crying visibly” on the operating room table of a Kentucky hospital as surgeons prepared to harvest his body parts.


Thomas “T.J.” Hoover was declared brain-dead after he was taken to Baptist Health Richmond Hospital in Richmond, Ky., in October 2021 following a drug overdose.

But as doctors went to test his heart health for transplantation, Hoover reportedly appeared very much alive, according to the patient’s sister and former Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates (KODA) employees in the room.

“He was moving around … thrashing around on the bed,” Natasha Miller told NPR.

“And then when we went over there, you could see he had tears coming down. He was crying visibly.”

Hoover’s sister, Donna Rhorer, said she became concerned when Hoover seemed to open his eyes and look around as he was being wheeled from the intensive care unit to the operating room.

“It was like it was his way of letting us know, you know, ‘Hey, I’m still here,’” she told the outlet, however, she and other family members were told it was just a common reflex.

The whole scene was “very chaotic,” Miller said, as two surgeons refused to move forward with the surgery.

“Everyone was just very upset.”



But things became more disturbing when Miller relayed what happened to a supervisor at KODA, which coordinated the transplant, who then told her that they were still “going to do this case” and the hospital needed to “find another doctor to do it.”

Another KODA worker, Nyckoletta Martin, said that while reviewing Hoover’s case, she discovered that the donor had previously showed signs of life as doctors examined his heart to see if it was viable for transplantation.

“The donor had woken up during his procedure that morning for a cardiac catheterization. And he was thrashing around on the table,” Martin told NPR.

According to case file records, the Hippocratic oath takers sedated the struggling Hoover when he awoke — and proceeded with their transplant plans.


The organ retrieval was ultimately cancelled, resulting in several employees, including Martin, to quit in the aftermath.


“I’ve dedicated my entire life to organ donation and transplant,” Martin said.

“It’s very scary to me now that these things are allowed to happen and there’s not more in place to protect donors.”

KODA officials have denied that any of their employees instructed doctors to “collect organs from any living patient.”

It added in a statement: “KODA does not recover organs from living patients. KODA has never pressured its team members to do so.’

Kentucky’s state attorney general and the federal Health Resources and Services Administration are both investigating the allegations.



Hoover survived and lives with his sister, according to the outlet.

He recovered but still has some issues with his memory, walking and talking.

“That’s everybody’s worst nightmare, right? Being alive during surgery and knowing that someone is going to cut you open and take your body parts out?” Martin said.

“That’s horrifying.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,360
3,246
113
Hong Kong discovers dinosaur fossils for first time
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Kanis Leung
Published Oct 23, 2024 • 1 minute read

Officials in Hong Kong said Wednesday they have discovered dinosaur fossils in the city for the first time on a remote, uninhabited island that's part of a geopark.
Officials in Hong Kong said Wednesday they have discovered dinosaur fossils in the city for the first time on a remote, uninhabited island that's part of a geopark.
HONG KONG — Officials in Hong Kong said Wednesday they have discovered dinosaur fossils in the city for the first time on a remote, uninhabited island that’s part of a geopark.


Experts have initially confirmed the fossils were part of a large dinosaur from the Cretaceous period, about 145 million to 66 million years ago, the government said in a statement. They will need to conduct further studies to confirm the species of the dinosaur.

Experts speculate that the dinosaur was likely buried by sand and gravel after its death before it was later washed to the surface by a large flood, and subsequently buried again at the discovery site, it said.

The government said the conservation department in March informed its Antiquities and Monuments Office about a sedimentary rock containing substances suspected to be vertebrate fossils. The rock was found on Port Island in the Hong Kong UNESCO Global Geopark in the city’s northeastern waters.

The government said it commissioned mainland Chinese experts to conduct field investigations.

Port Island is closed to the public from Wednesday until further notice to facilitate future investigations and excavations.

The fossils will be on display at the Hong Kong Heritage Discovery Centre in Tsim Sha Tsui, one of the city’s popular shopping districts, starting on Friday. The government is also planning to open a temporary workshop for the public to observe experts’ preparation of fossil specimens by the end of 2024.
GettyImages-2167965055[1].jpg
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,360
3,246
113
We all have too many reusable bags, it's a disaster
Reusable shopping bags were sold as being better for the environment, that turns out to be a lie.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Oct 28, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

We've been told that reusable bags will save the environment. Turns out, that's not true.
Brian Lilley says he has 25 "reusable" grocery bags, plus other speciality bags, sitting by his front door. It's not a helping the environment.
There are currently 25 “reusable” grocery store-style bags sitting at my front door, half a dozen large shopping bags and a similar number of bags with dividers to carry bottles home from the liquor store.


Can we finally agree that doing away with paper and plastic shopping bags was a mistake and an environmental disaster?

There is no way that these “reusable” bags, which will live for years and years, are having a smaller environmental impact than what they replaced.

“Help us protect the environment. Use this bag each time you shop,” say the bags from one grocery store chain.

“Wash in cold water,” says the bag from another store.

Yes, you likely didn’t realize that these bags that carry meat and vegetables, cleaners and canned goods to your home needed to be cleaned regularly.


“Reusable grocery bags and bins can collect harmful bacteria from foods. These bacteria can also contaminate other foods or items in the bags/bins and put you at risk of food poisoning,” warns Health Canada.


Also little known is that the total environmental impact of reusable bags is often greater than the plastic bags they replaced.

Depending on how your “reusable” bag is manufactured, you would have to use that bag between 45 and 52 times before it would be better for the environment than an old-fashioned plastic grocery bag.

Is that likely to happen?

Maybe for some, but most likely not for most of us.

The study on how often “reusable” bags need to be used wasn’t conducted by a right-wing think tank but rather the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Unlike so many of our environmentalists, they laid the facts on the line rather than trying to put forward politics as science.

Did you know that for an organic cotton bag to have a lower environmental impact than a plastic grocery bag, it would need to be used 2,000 times?



If you want to use an organic cotton bag for your shopping, knock yourself out but know that the construction of that bag comes with a cost — environmental and otherwise. For far too long, we’ve taken hardline positions that don’t recognize the reality of the situation.

Plastic is always bad, even paper bags are bad to some. The sturdier “reusable” plastic bags are obviously considered better, according to our policymakers and green-oriented corporations, even if the total environmental impact is bigger than a plastic shopping bag.

It’s a kind of green virtue signalling.

It would have been more than 20 years ago when I was interviewing an honest environmental expert on the issue of what kind of shopping bag is best. At that point, the debate was whether paper or plastic bags were best.


“It depends,” said my expert.

He went on to detail that factors such as the weight of the bag, how far it was being shipped, whether it could be reused — all played into the environmental impact.

We don’t get thoughtful analysis like that these days; we get declarations that companies will show their green bona fides by banning shopping bags, except the “reusable” kind that they will charge you for and make a handy profit on.

For the 25 “reusable” grocery bags sitting in my front closet — never mind the half dozen in the trunk of my car — they would have to be used between 1,125 and 1,300 times to be an environmental benefit.

There is nothing wrong with using a “reusable” bag if you want to, but enforcing it by government or corporate edict isn’t the win advocates claim it is.

Let’s drop the dogma and get back to reality.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,360
3,246
113
We all have too many reusable bags, it's a disaster
Reusable shopping bags were sold as being better for the environment, that turns out to be a lie.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Oct 28, 2024 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

We've been told that reusable bags will save the environment. Turns out, that's not true.
Brian Lilley says he has 25 "reusable" grocery bags, plus other speciality bags, sitting by his front door. It's not a helping the environment.
There are currently 25 “reusable” grocery store-style bags sitting at my front door, half a dozen large shopping bags and a similar number of bags with dividers to carry bottles home from the liquor store.


Can we finally agree that doing away with paper and plastic shopping bags was a mistake and an environmental disaster?

There is no way that these “reusable” bags, which will live for years and years, are having a smaller environmental impact than what they replaced.

“Help us protect the environment. Use this bag each time you shop,” say the bags from one grocery store chain.

“Wash in cold water,” says the bag from another store.

Yes, you likely didn’t realize that these bags that carry meat and vegetables, cleaners and canned goods to your home needed to be cleaned regularly.


“Reusable grocery bags and bins can collect harmful bacteria from foods. These bacteria can also contaminate other foods or items in the bags/bins and put you at risk of food poisoning,” warns Health Canada.


Also little known is that the total environmental impact of reusable bags is often greater than the plastic bags they replaced.

Depending on how your “reusable” bag is manufactured, you would have to use that bag between 45 and 52 times before it would be better for the environment than an old-fashioned plastic grocery bag.

Is that likely to happen?

Maybe for some, but most likely not for most of us.

The study on how often “reusable” bags need to be used wasn’t conducted by a right-wing think tank but rather the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Unlike so many of our environmentalists, they laid the facts on the line rather than trying to put forward politics as science.

Did you know that for an organic cotton bag to have a lower environmental impact than a plastic grocery bag, it would need to be used 2,000 times?



If you want to use an organic cotton bag for your shopping, knock yourself out but know that the construction of that bag comes with a cost — environmental and otherwise. For far too long, we’ve taken hardline positions that don’t recognize the reality of the situation.

Plastic is always bad, even paper bags are bad to some. The sturdier “reusable” plastic bags are obviously considered better, according to our policymakers and green-oriented corporations, even if the total environmental impact is bigger than a plastic shopping bag.

It’s a kind of green virtue signalling.

It would have been more than 20 years ago when I was interviewing an honest environmental expert on the issue of what kind of shopping bag is best. At that point, the debate was whether paper or plastic bags were best.


“It depends,” said my expert.

He went on to detail that factors such as the weight of the bag, how far it was being shipped, whether it could be reused — all played into the environmental impact.

We don’t get thoughtful analysis like that these days; we get declarations that companies will show their green bona fides by banning shopping bags, except the “reusable” kind that they will charge you for and make a handy profit on.

For the 25 “reusable” grocery bags sitting in my front closet — never mind the half dozen in the trunk of my car — they would have to be used between 1,125 and 1,300 times to be an environmental benefit.

There is nothing wrong with using a “reusable” bag if you want to, but enforcing it by government or corporate edict isn’t the win advocates claim it is.

Let’s drop the dogma and get back to reality.
something no one asked for. :(
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,360
3,246
113
Snake species named in honour of Leonardo DiCaprio
Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Oct 27, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 1 minute read

The DiCaprio's Himalayan snake, AKA the Anguiculus dicaprioi snake, is named in honour of Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio.
The DiCaprio's Himalayan snake, AKA the Anguiculus dicaprioi snake, is named in honour of Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio. Photo by SCREEN GRAB /Vipul Ramanuj
In case being a handsome Hollywood movie star wasn’t enough, Leonardo DiCaprio now has a species of snake named in his honour.


Researchers found the reptile in the western Himalayas in the summer of 2020, the Miami Herald reported, citing an “ongoing study” published by nature.com on Monday, Oct. 21.

Scientists caught a few of the copper-coloured snakes with dozens of teeth and analyzed their DNA, finding that, although the serpent had familiar traits of other snakes, it was an entirely new species – Anguiculus dicaprioi, or DiCaprio’s Himalayan snake.

The DiCaprio’s snakes are considered small, reaching lengths of only 56 centimetres. They have “short” heads, “large” nostrils, and many teeth.

The newly-discovered species can be identified by a “faint” grey band, which appears as a “collar” around the reptile’s neck.


The snake’s name was an obvious choice, researchers said, because the “American actor, film producer, and environmentalist (is someone) who has been actively involved in creating awareness about global climate change (and) increased biodiversity loss.”

The species was found “basking” on the roads of muddy mountains and “remained motionless until caught and made no attempts to bite.”

DiCaprio’s Himalayan snakes can survive elevations of about 1,850 metres, the researchers said.


According to the published findings, the new species has been found in Nepal and the neighboring Indian states of Himachal Pradesh.

Speaking to people.com at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2016 for his documentary The Ivory Game, DiCaprio explained how he got into environmental activism.

“At a young age, I was very saddened by species that had become extinct by the result of man-made activity, and so that led me on a long sort of journey to get me involved in environmental issues,” the Oscar winner said at the time.
1730300665730.png