Wow. Deep.Forensic evidence requires evidence.
Prisons are full of folk like that.The local knows the lay of the land ... and has friends
Wow. Deep.Forensic evidence requires evidence.
Prisons are full of folk like that.The local knows the lay of the land ... and has friends
I defended some of them.Somehow, I think you're only TOO familiar with that
The libs and the law. The principle that removing trespassers is only permissible if it can be done without a breach of the peace goes back to the Middle Ages.
Don't see how that's relevant. The fact that the snowmobilers may be violating the law does not give you the right to shoot them.What were the laws you agreed to when you took the snowmobile endorsement test on your drivers license and registered and insured your sled?
Objection....Assuming facts not in evidenceDon't see how that's relevant. The fact that the snowmobilers may be violating the law does not give you the right to shoot them.
Did he shoot them? Since they were agitating his livestock he has the right to use whatever means it requires to elimate the risk to his livelihood.Don't see how that's relevant. The fact that the snowmobilers may be violating the law does not give you the right to shoot them.
Good, I'm not licensed to practice in Canada. And if you think you can shoot someone to "eliminate risk to livelihood," I'm glad I don't have to represent you. Talk about a slam-dunk for the Crown!Did he shoot them? Since they were agitating his livestock he has the right to use whatever means it requires to elimate the risk to his livelihood.
One of the requirements of legally operating a sled means you agreed to stay on trails and off private land without expressed consent.
You're sure a sh-tty lawyer. I'd never hihire you.
If they were killing my winter wheat there would be stains in the snow.
Defending your property is NOT "vigilante justice".
I defended some of them.
Check the Canadian laws bub.Good, I'm not licensed to practice in Canada. And if you think you can shoot someone to "eliminate risk to livelihood," I'm glad I don't have to represent you. Talk about a slam-dunk for the Crown!
Yeah, I tried that thing of manipulating the truly guilty person into leaping to his feet in the middle of the trial and spontaneously confessing, but you'd be surprised how rarely that actually works.Which is probably why they're in prison.
What makes him a redneck?Especially when, if he hadn't had the gun, those guy would have kicked his redneck ***a ss.
What makes him a redneck?
Yeah, I tried that thing of manipulating the truly guilty person into leaping to his feet in the middle of the trial and spontaneously confessing, but you'd be surprised how rarely that actually works.
RCMP are spread pretty thin, it's why farmers NEED to pack heat at all times. Would I be a redneck bumpkin in the city if I belted somebody who was doing donuts on my lawn with their motor vehicle?He comes across as an uneducated bumpkin. A rude one at that. Why not take the licence numbers and call the ArseyMP ??
You're mixing your terms. "Ambulance chasers" are plaintiff's attorneys in civil cases.He comes across as an uneducated bumpkin. A rude one at that. Why not take the licence numbers and call the ArseyMP ??
NOpe, not really. I'm not a criminal, so I don't give a fukk. Leave it up to ambulance chasers.
Defending it with lethal force, however, is "assault with a deadly weapon."