Rush LImbaugh's new conspiracy theory
- Thread starter Tonington
- Start date
another useless american spouting out his ass. Anybody that takes anything this useless drug addict says would be as brain dead as he is.
So whose sock puppet are you property of then? What I linked to was a video. No text from a media matters writer, except for the headline, which makes use of quotes from Limbaugh's own program.
It's funny that you post something from Palin, and then warn of the impending ad hominems. Ironic.
:lol:
Looks to me like the fat around Limbaugh's belly is slowly shifting to his head. Why would anyone take anything that uniformed idiot says seriously?
Obama is right, and Rush is one of those talking heads that has become nothing more than a pimple on America's ass.
.
Obama calls for "vibrant and thriving news business that is separate from opinion makers and talking heads" | Media Matters for America
.
Obama calls for "vibrant and thriving news business that is separate from opinion makers and talking heads" | Media Matters for America
I think that those are great examples of Ad hominens ....
Towards Limbaugh......and his listeners
Edit: Reading back I notice I missed one....oops;-)
This catastrophic event creates a great media spot, and considering the timing it couldn't have happened at a more perfect time. If it was not an accident those responsible should be hung, or better yet force oil down their mouth and let they die a slow death like the animals will be doing.
Wouldn't surprise me if Greenpeace was involved - they attempted to plug the pipe works at an oil sands plant earlier this year.. Mind you, I would be surprised that a mainstream group would blow-up an offshore facility
Icarus27k asked:
"My question would be: if it's ecoterrorism, why hadn't ecoterrorists thought of this before? Instead, they just burn down a research lab or two."
Perhaps, because prior to this event President Obama has always been a willing and totally co-operatng puppet of enviro-terrorists and no intention to change the status quo of American dependence on foreign oil.
"My question would be: if it's ecoterrorism, why hadn't ecoterrorists thought of this before? Instead, they just burn down a research lab or two."
Perhaps, because prior to this event President Obama has always been a willing and totally co-operatng puppet of enviro-terrorists and no intention to change the status quo of American dependence on foreign oil.
Not impossible, although I think it is more like poor maintenance. Could even have been a disgruntled worker that miscalculated. . After all someone is blowing up Encana pipelines and ecoterrorists have been known to slash nets at fish farms and plug culverts on logging roads.
This does make the tarsands look a lot better.
We all know that if they had (a very expensive) remote controlled security valve near the sea bottom in place we wouldn't be discussing this.
But to go and blame any owner for a burglary or a terrorist action is a bit of a stretch...non?
Actually, an ad hominem is an argument that takes the form of "person X claims Y, but person X is wrong because they are a bad person (or some other negative quality)".
Only one comes close to an ad hominem, and it's not even a statement, it was a question. So, no, not great, not even examples of ad hominem.