Neo Con and New Liberal(see the wiki links in first post) are essentially same, they are all like to eliminate Individuality and advocate the few ones that control government's total control. It's just same thing different facade forms; this happened in Kingdoms several decades ago too, George Orwell noted this too, said regardless how they tag themselves as left or right they all turning to few control all, and eliminate individual. they just under different facade forms, like say to fake right ones would be attracted by a left thing under a right tag, like say they would think Bush's spy individual is protect, and Obama's is spy. Truly right ones will never be attracted by this, because he knows to see the more essential part of things instead of tag, and he knows the individuality is the eventually way to distinguish left and right, as well as spirituality.
I don't need to find any "community", this fake collective conception is what left like to use, I only need to find specific persons, I have got a lot, living in different countries.
I go to Alberta want to start businesses in here, add another businesses' brand of this area(I treat businesses as one so use singular), also get another passport. If a person does not get 3 or 5 passports he will be slave of a government, literally.
I am not a Neo Con or anything, I just myself. I know people also from individual, not the tags. Tag level only is a early level to understand things. I used wikilinks of neo con and new liberal just for give people a rough image about what I am talking about.
"The left you are referring to are called radicals or socialists."
The left I say is the one whom plays "fake collectivism", use that to eliminate individuality.
Radical the conception itself presumes a person is define its view by the stream, that he minus both two views ruin each other a certain percentage and follow that to do things. That's how retarded and subjects to do. They will only in worse and worse situations.
Social this word means following, now it has turned to a fake collective conception that left like to use.
“democracy”
democracy in nowadays eventually is oligarchy. The ones whom don't see this definitely always are the ones not in high position. The nowdays' system is new system, I always would like to refer it as Proxy System(they put some ones in front as proxy of the people, but actually they are proxies of masters). The government of current English Speaking Countries want to let subject think this is a system started from long time ago, also let subject think they are same as their masters. But this is NOT true, this is a new system that created only few hundred years ago. At Japanese Culture it referred this system very clearly as 近代国家(transliteration: Kindai Kokka, literally Near Generation Country), before that it was another system, and subjects would not think that is "THEIR" country. They know very clearly that it is master or masters' country. In medieval ages regardless in England or in Japan, countryman"国人[kokujin] of Japanese" only means the ones whom really have power, not those subjects.
There is no mother tongue or non-mother tongue. Current day's English as has been influenced by all Indo-Aryan Languages it is not so total different as most people in here thought. Study some etymology and phonology, you will understand its origins, derived forms, possible akins very easily, for example, regarding etymology, use a simple example: fire: Middle English, from Old English fȳr; akin to Old High German fiur fire, Greek pyr
Regarding phonology, use a sample example about Water and Wasser, What and Was, this happened in consonant shifting. You can pronounce any accent you want, and create accents yourself.
In another side, I think if a person only know one or two languages then he is not himself, he is a slave of a certain culture. Ukrainian and Russian are similar, and the ones whom master Ukraine think if a country does not have its own language then it is not an independent country, so emphasize Ukrainian different with Russian Language is very important. Same metaphor, a person must know(here know not only mean say some words in another accent a little, but means know the etymology and phonology) a lot of languages then he can belong to himself, instead of a slave of a culture.
Regarding that link, thank you for your remind regarding that link though, but I don't need to join that party. I just myself, and to know people from individual, in a relative more individual freedom loving area, and start another businesses' branch and get another passport. Also get a better position on little planet.
----------------- von Essenz
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"What makes you think we want you here?“
You really have serious problems. You are a little thing that have no power instead of following masters. Depends on what you think you can decide whether I go to a place or not. I bet you in your life never get a high position and always be decided by this or that. That's why you rant here and put your energy in internet to troll another person's post instead of to do some positive things to yourself.
Plus, as I said, the one whom hide under fake collectivism "we" definitely very pathetic(I say pathetic means they themselves as individual as feel itself is pathetic) in their life as individual, that's why they identify themselves with masters, also that's why the masters like to see, stupid little subjects are similar everywhere, that's why masters have game to play.
"Where on earth did you get the idea that AB was right wing bastion? O'Reilly?"
That little play is your neo con left brothers like to watch, isn't it? You only know these little neo con channels, right?
correction: "add another businesses' brand of this area" ——> add another businesses' branch of area that I have