Apparently the threat level from a hypothetical TIPS release of unknown quantity and duration is the same as the afghan releases from last year which have had no security-related impact.
LMAO!!!Who phoned TIPS from A-Stan?
The moral and ethical malleability of your principles, is noted.Apparently the threat level from a hypothetical TIPS release of unknown quantity and duration is the same as the afghan releases from last year which have had no security-related impact.
Just because I haven't said why I haven't posted them, since the last page, doesn't change that fact.Did you ever point out the law that says US or Canada or some EU nations are REQUIRED to protect informants? No, you didn't. Still waiting for that. Anytime you're ready.
LMAO!!!Post the obligations or STFU.
Post the obligations or STFU.
Did you ever point out the law that says US or Canada or some EU nations are REQUIRED to protect informants? No, you didn't. Still waiting for that. Anytime you're ready.
LMAO!!! Especially since you keep dodging Assange's own admission. You really should pick a principle and stick to it.You expect him to?
He's the master of dodging, lol
That's why you keep dodging my challenge.It's hard to post what doesn't exist.
Tell me about it.Now where did that damned rabbit go;-)? over there????
Post the law that obligates Canada, US and some EU nations to protect civilian Afghan informants and I'll consider your challenge.That's why you keep dodging my challenge..
LOL.Post the law that obligates Canada, US and some EU nations to protect civilian Afghan informants and I'll consider your challenge.
You have to dodge your own posts?What am I dodging? Volleys of bull****?
Post the law that obligates Canada, US and some EU nations to protect civilian Afghan informants and I'll consider your challenge.
Keep dodging...Anytime you're ready to post your "case law" I'll gladly review it.
Hey cool, we're at the **** stage now.Post your **** buddy. You said you have it so now is your chance.