Perhaps Baird should set up a Freedom-To-Do-Dishes-Wearing-A-Cassock Office in Foreign Affairs. There are so many freedoms without their own office.
I second that. It is high time freedom was properly regulated.
Perhaps Baird should set up a Freedom-To-Do-Dishes-Wearing-A-Cassock Office in Foreign Affairs. There are so many freedoms without their own office.
Perhaps Baird should set up a Freedom-To-Do-Dishes-Wearing-A-Cassock Office in Foreign Affairs. There are so many freedoms without their own office.
Perhaps Baird should set up a Freedom-To-Do-Dishes-Wearing-A-Cassock Office in Foreign Affairs. There are so many freedoms without their own office.
So you have been studied all 10 K or so. Amazing. A true zealot.
This has always been a contention of mine because I try to be a social libertarian. Technically, government intervention is bad, but if the intervention actually promotes more liberty then it is good??
This has always been a contention of mine because I try to be a social libertarian. Technically, government intervention is bad, but if the intervention actually promotes more liberty then it is good??
Paradoxes give me migraines. Anyone have ASA?
This has always been a contention of mine because I try to be a social libertarian. Technically, government intervention is bad, but if the intervention actually promotes more liberty then it is good??
I do not see why you have such a conflict
Social safety net - Fed – Prov.
Pensions - OAS etc - Fed - Taxpayer - Business.
Charter of Rights.
No when it comes to the market place I then could see a problem.
Correct - Reason it is in Foreign Affairs. If it was to monitor the Canadian Religious Right, it would have been tucked away in the Ministry of "Hidden Agenda"s". Thank God it was not.
Clinton the hero for some opened the first US Office under his watch. So if Clinton did it, why would Liberals complain?
What relationship is there between Clinton and Liberals?
Historically, conservatives were opposed to free trade and liberals supported it. We don't support or oppose a cause because our favourite party supports it. The classic definition of partisan bobble-heads.
Mulroney was for NAFTA - Liberals (Chretien) were against it if I recall. Many Liberals in Canada were quite high on Clinton
I was thinking Reciprocity in the late 1800s:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocity_(Canadian_politics)
Well I am old but I ain't that old.
So you know nothing of the world prior to your birth?
More ideas for Big Government
1. Restrict demonstrations of 3 people or more.
2. Establish Freedom-of-Assembly Office