Id be wary too if a gang of low IQ texas hillbillies came my way..Or a gang of Irish nuns
nuns are scary (I went to catholic school)
nuns are scary (I went to catholic school)
If police have on a security camera that a black guy about 20-years-old robbed a store, then stopping middle-aged white women wouldn't make sense, but the ability to profile by instinct doesn't make sense, becuase so many stereotypes are wrong. Most people in US jails for drug crimes are black, but most people who commit drug crimes in the US are white, so it's a racist system. I think racial profiling will always result in racism to some degree.tamarin said:The human animal has accumulated admirable survival skills built on the ability to profile and stereotype. How else do you know to sense danger? How else do you sensibly exercise caution? It's becomes instinctive. Some profiling has become an issue in our society but it must be appreciated that profiling stems from an intelligence moulded by long centuries of playing the survival game well.
I don't get it. Are you saying racism is a survival skill?tamarin said:Racism and sexism and ageism and speciesism and ethnicism will always be here and most of us guard against them. But that doesn't relieve us of the responsibility to act decisively based on what we know. What experience has taught us. We have to act sensitively and sensibly as I've said before. But not to act is unforgivable.
tamarin said:Any aspect of an ism is a survival skill. Why do we instruct doctors to direct the suspension of any elderly driver they deem to be physically compromised and why do governments mandate yearly or biannual driver examinations once one is 80? It's discriminatory, it's ageism but it's based on hard experience.
Why do health authorities target AIDS campaigns to minority communities? Because that's were incidence is a problem. We discriminate based on hard experience.
Why do police instruct tourists to stay out of certain enclaves of Toronto when visiting? It's racist but based on hard experience.
Hey, it fits with the 'harm reduction' policy so popular in Canada today. Applied sensitively it makes sense.
Driver's licenses are different, there are physical issues that are more likely to be aproblem when one is older. Tourists should stay out of parts of Toronto because people who are poorer are more likely to mug them, because they need the money more. And they're poorer because A) their parents were poor and so they didn't get as good as education and B) employers discriminate on the basis of race.tamarin said:Any aspect of an ism is a survival skill. Why do we instruct doctors to direct the suspension of any elderly driver they deem to be physically compromised and why do governments mandate yearly or biannual driver examinations once one is 80? It's discriminatory, it's ageism but it's based on hard experience.
Why do health authorities target AIDS campaigns to minority communities? Because that's were incidence is a problem. We discriminate based on hard experience.
Why do police instruct tourists to stay out of certain enclaves of Toronto when visiting? It's racist but based on hard experience.
Hey, it fits with the 'harm reduction' policy so popular in Canada today. Applied sensitively it makes sense.
tamarin said:It's worse than racial profiling. A recent story out of London states British police and other law enforcement personnel there are considering profiling the weird! If you act differently from your peers, have a funny look, smile like a dick or laugh like a horse you're likely to be pulled over at the airport clearance lounge. Just because you're weird. Now I've heard it all.
That's insane.tamarin said:It's worse than racial profiling. A recent story out of London states British police and other law enforcement personnel there are considering profiling the weird! If you act differently from your peers, have a funny look, smile like a dick or laugh like a horse you're likely to be pulled over at the airport clearance lounge. Just because you're weird. Now I've heard it all.