Quit picking on Obama……

[ironsides]

Our New Dictator May Be In Deep Trouble


According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government,
a smackdown of President Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.

Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.

http://current.com/news/92734715_our-new-dictator-may-be-in-deep-trouble.htm


No grasping for straws here, he just might be in real trouble.

 

[mentalfloss]

roflmao @ Our New Dictator headline. How do you find these sites? lol

 

[ironsides]

sent to me via email, occasionally one shows up interesting.

'Obama unlikely to last his first term'
Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:46AM





A US analyst says US President Barack Obama is unlikely to end his first term as there are serious efforts by American officials to remove him due to his incompetence.


"It is very doubtful at this time that he will last his first term," Edward Spannaus of Executive Intelligence Review said in an interview with Press TV on Wednesday.

"There are people who are upset within the administration and the Democratic party who are seriously considering how to remove Obama from presidency," Spannaus added.

Many of them put out all their calls for removing Obama under the amendment 25th of the US Constitution.

The amendment allows for the removal of the US president if he is incapacitated either physically or mentally.

Spannaus also opined that people in the military are upset because Obama "is not attentive" to what is going on. "We have troops killing and being killed and he is not interested in dealing with it," he further explained.

 

[YukonJack]

Obama fancies himself to be the new Abraham Lincoln.

Some other times he is delusional enough to think that he is a new Thomas Jefferson. If he did a bit of self-examination, he would realize that he is more like George Jefferson.

With one significant difference: George Jefferson RAN a successful business.

 

[mentalfloss]

Wow. You guys really know how to funnel in the tripe. I guess you have no qualms checking your sources to make sure that they are unbiased I see....

That mag is part and parcel with the La Rouche Movement, which if I'm not mistaken here...

Though often dismissed as a bizarre political cult, the LaRouche organization and its various front groups are a fascist movement whose pronouncements echo elements of Nazi ideology. Beginning in the 1970s, the LaRouchites combined populist antielitism with attacks on leftists, environmentalists, feminists, gay men and lesbians, and organized labor. They advocated a dictatorship in which a 'humanist' elite would rule on behalf of industrial capitalists. They developed an idiosyncratic, coded variation on the Illuminati Freemason and Jewish banker conspiracy theories. Their views, though exotic, were internally consistent and rooted in right-wing populist traditions.

Hmm.. I don't think these quacks are in any position to be making value judgments right now.

 

[ironsides]

Looks like Adolph is playing tickle tickle. :lol:

 

[EagleSmack]

Canada is at 196 and has a tenth of the population of the US.

He was probably factoring HOT AIR.

Reagan ended the cold war? Pile of right wing rehtoric.

Wait a minute. Didn't you post that Obama won the War in Iraq? So what kind of pile is that?

PWNED

I wonder how long before the fed desperately starts printing more money?

Any day now I am sure.

 

[YukonJack]

Wow. You guys really know how to funnel in the tripe. I guess you have no qualms checking your sources to make sure that they are unbiased I see....

That mag is part and parcel with the La Rouche Movement, which if I'm not mistaken here...

Though often dismissed as a bizarre political cult, the LaRouche organization and its various front groups are a fascist movement whose pronouncements echo elements of Nazi ideology. Beginning in the 1970s, the LaRouchites combined populist antielitism with attacks on leftists, environmentalists, feminists, gay men and lesbians, and organized labor. They advocated a dictatorship in which a 'humanist' elite would rule on behalf of industrial capitalists. They developed an idiosyncratic, coded variation on the Illuminati Freemason and Jewish banker conspiracy theories. Their views, though exotic, were internally consistent and rooted in right-wing populist traditions.

Hmm.. I don't think these quacks are in any position to be making value judgments right now.

If you are getting your news from CBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, CNN, New York Times, Atlanta Urinal-Constipation, The Daily Show, etc. you are in no position to be making value judgements right now.

 

[mentalfloss]

Right. I should be getting all my material from Fox and the La Rouche Movement. LOL

You are one crazy mofo Yukon.

 

[YukonJack]

mentalfloss, you are getting into the nasty habit of name-calling.

 

[mentalfloss]

Ha! Well, I guess I'll tone that down for you then.

Would you like to say anything more or will this thread plunk down until the next propaganda piece gets posted?

 

[YukonJack]

mentalfloss, don't worry, I am mature enough not to report any name-calling, no matter how vile. So, keep on going, don't change a thing on my account, name-calling is more a reflection on you than on those you disagree with.

You seem to have a problem with opinions (different from yours, of course) quoted from reputable sources. Why?

 

[mentalfloss]

If the logic of the piece is objective, or at least appears objective, I might be a bit more forgiving. But when it's someone's opinion - like when someone making a forecast without any reasonable evidence or sound rationale - I'll question the source. And in this case it was clearly a biased source. Spannaus works for Executive Intelligence Review. EIR is being used as a mouthpiece for the La Roche Movement. The La Roche movement is a cult movement that clearly has an agenda.

It would be like protestor girl saying that Obama will be ruling for the next 6 years. I would find that equally questionable based on the source.

I'm not sure why you would have a problem with that.

 

[Avro]

mentalfloss, don't worry, I am mature enough not to report any name-calling, no matter how vile. So, keep on going, don't change a thing on my account, name-calling is more a reflection on you than on those you disagree with.

You seem to have a problem with opinions (different from yours, of course) quoted from reputable sources. Why?

Get over yourself.

You call people names all the time ya internet tough guy.

Wait a minute. Didn't you post that Obama won the War in Iraq? So what kind of pile is that?

PWNED

You thought I was serious about the Obama crack? Guess Poe's law is true....I'll try and know my audience better next time.

 

[EagleSmack]

You thought I was serious about the Obama crack? Guess Poe's law is true....I'll try and know my audience better next time.

lol. Let's all move them goal posts... Avro style.

"Oh I was just kidding... you thought I was serious?"

PWNED

 

[Avro]

lol. Let's all move them goal posts... Avro style.

"Oh I was just kidding... you thought I was serious?"

PWNED

I was.

Sort of like if the economy recovers in December cons will credit the political shift of the House.

Obama didn't win the war at all....it isn't over.

I'm sorry if you didn't get it.

 

[EagleSmack]

I was.

lol.

Yeah... ok..sure thing.

Sort of like if the economy recovers in December cons will credit the political shift of the House.

Obama didn't win the war at all....it isn't over.

I'm sorry if you didn't get it.

Ok... roger that.

Always a pleasure.

 

[Avro]

lol.

Yeah... ok..sure thing.



Ok... roger that.

Always a pleasure.

I can see that as usual you are the oil to my water.

I will fix this Eagle.

Have a nice life buddy.

Bye.

 

[EagleSmack]

I can see that as usual you are the oil to my water.

I will fix this Eagle.

Have a nice life buddy.

Bye.

Adios!

 

[JLM]

mentalfloss, don't worry, I am mature enough not to report any name-calling, no matter how vile. So, keep on going, don't change a thing on my account, name-calling is more a reflection on you than on those you disagree with.

You seem to have a problem with opinions (different from yours, of course) quoted from reputable sources. Why?

Right on Y.J.- Sometimes you just have to consider the source (and ignore it). :lol: