I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.Yet two thirds of tax revenue going to corporate income tax cuts means nothing to you.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.Yet two thirds of tax revenue going to corporate income tax cuts means nothing to you.
Companies that reduce emissions (regardless of market forces) pay less tax to begin with, because their emissions are taxed.
The lesson here is that the producers have far more agency over emissions than consumers, and there is a much bigger incentive for business for them to reduce emissions and save on the tax.
You're confusing Hong Kong with central China. You're also confusing per capita vs. total output.
Considering Hong Kong's population and Shenzhen's population right next to it, the two cities combined reaching near Canada's total population, Hong Kong's air was remarkably pleasant. Not as clean as Canada's, but if Hong Kong polluted like Canada does on a per capita basis, Hong Kong would be worse than Beijing!
Hong Kong's air was clean enough that I could enjoy it. I'm sure the following played a role in making the air so pleasant in Hong Kong:
1. A high carbon tax.
2. No transit subsidies. All funding of public transit is supported by commuter fares.
3. More user-pay transit fares. A subway ticket between two neighboring stations is less expensive than between distant stations, and bus fares vary depending on distance covered too. Many buses are like taxis with no stop in between, all on board going to the same location.
Transit passes do exist, but you have to scan it when you enter and again when you exit. To enter, you must have enough money on the card to cover the most expensive possible fare.
Canada can certainly learn from Hong Kong's user-pay system.
BC's had a carbon tax for about...8 years now?
Huh.
And what type of salary would one command to be able to live there comfortably? The cost of living is very high there.
JMHO
Good enough for 7 million people to choose to live there.
I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.Your cherry picking blew back in your face there?
What a dang shame.
I predicted this two pages ago.Yeesh, knew you'd have given up but good lord this is getting awkward.
....or not to have decided to leave yet.
It's easy for you to say that while collecting ODSP and being supported by your family.This idea that life should always come cheap is naive when it's actually about values and what people will go through to support those values.
No it didn't. It just shifted the burden elsewhere. Go figure you wouldn't comprehend that though.It shows that a significant reduction in fossil fuels extraction also reduced carbon emissions.
Go figure.
No it didn't. It just shifted the burden elsewhere. Go figure you wouldn't comprehend that though.
Nova Scotia? Good for them.Carbon reductions are occurring in the most prosperous province in the country.
And yet it is widely acknowledged that their economy and the carbon tax is a success.