I know. We have a very similar mindset that way. Which is why I won't even bother challenging you. I respect your position.lol... that is what I told them. There would be no ya buts, or excuses.
I know. We have a very similar mindset that way. Which is why I won't even bother challenging you. I respect your position.lol... that is what I told them. There would be no ya buts, or excuses.
What a lovely example of ignorance at its finest. I don't like what you have to say, so I'll beat you up if you say it.
These people should be ashamed.
The people have threatened violence.the people have spoken, I guess.
The people have threatened violence.
That's just ignorance, no matter how you try and dress it up.
It's not even a violent crime. Whether he legitimately advocates rape or not, isn't a violent crime. It's ignorant, satire or otherwise.What proves not only ignorance, but a definite lack of cognitive skills is the fact that these peoples solution (including the terminally stupid on this board) advocate violence as a solution to a "violent" crime.
Except for all the ones in the emotional centres of their brains.The women's boxing team being a prime example of a lack of working brain cells.
The people have threatened violence.
That's just ignorance, no matter how you try and dress it up.
It's not even a violent crime. Whether he legitimately advocates rape or not, isn't a violent crime. It's ignorant, satire or otherwise.
Except for all the ones in the emotional centres of their brains.
Quite.He has "triggered" many emotional brains.
My wife's an abuse survivor. She isn't triggered. She thinks he's a pig. She firmly believes that he should be allowed to speak, and challenged on his positions. Not threatened with violence.He's 'triggered' every woman who has ever been sexually assaulted and/or raped and he's "triggered" many of their fathers, brothers, husbands, sisters, mothers, etc.
Quite.
My wife's an abuse survivor. She isn't triggered. She thinks he's a pig. She firmly believes that he should be allowed to speak, and challenged on his positions. Not threatened with violence.
Both actually.She's right. He should be challenged mentally. Some people are incapable of clear thinking. Isn't that how the west was won? braun over brain?
Both actually.
But aren't we supposed to be evolving away from that?
Both actually.
But aren't we supposed to be evolving away from that?
How many men have been merely charged, and had their life ruined despite also being drunk?Maybe it should be a crime automatically guilty if she was drunk
Wouldn't that change things up a bit? If someone was drunk a
stand up guy would pass until she was sober. No in my opinion
Gerry is right if you have to get her drunk you don't deserve it.
Don't let the defense use the drunk excuse for sexual assault,
drunk driving or any other unlawful offense even for murder or
manslaughter. No drunk or on drugs excuses anymore
How many men have been merely charged, and had their life ruined despite also being drunk?
And if one of them was drunk, and found themselves charged because she woke up with second thoughts.I refer you back to my post about what I tell my boys.
But if both parties are drunk. Why is oft the man that has to be responsible, while she gets a pass?Really, Bear, what it comes down to is that SOMEONE needs to be responsible. If we can't rely on women to be that person, then the men need to step up to the plate. If she's drunk, then it's no. Period. Take responsibility for your actions with no excuses.
And if one of them was drunk, and found themselves charged because she woke up with second thoughts.
But if both parties are drunk. Why is oft the man that has to be responsible, while she gets a pass?
honestly? fear. He scares me.
But if the whole town doesn't want it? why can't the whole town say no? why do they HAVE to let it in?