The difference being of course that being an anti-vaxxer isn't a naturally occurring event. Not that you'd be bright enough to see the difference.
It's funny that those who are stupid enough to suggest "the science is settled" are clearly into advocacy science while ignoring actual scientific facts.
The LIA ended about 15 years before the Industrial Revolution. How odd that as we came out of a cooling phase we'd enter into a warming phase.
Ocean acidification is NOT a result of our actions. It is the result of thousands of submarine volcanoes, smokers, stacks, and vents. Proof of that can be found along a sizable stretch of water near Italy that is completely devoid of life. The culprit is a small vent in the sea floor that is continually emitting almost pure CO2. Elsewhere, a recent expedition to the Mid-Atlantic ridge discovered it was far more active that originally believed. Mile after mile of active black smokers, stacks and vents with the odd small volcano.
No, the AGW crowd is more like the anti-vaxxer crowd. Similar to those who are dead set against vaccines but have no issue with having nature's most potent bio-toxin injected into their face for reasons of vanity, are the fear-mongering AGW cultists who have no problem renting out massive yachts, flying around in private aircraft and/or building multiple homes, some of which are on islands or on the shore.
And if you're so sure that scientists are unimpeachable with their ethics and commitment to science, I have two words for you; tobacco industry. Actually, I have another word for you; Monsanto. Oh, and let's not forget hormone therapy for menopausal women. That sure was some fun science by consensus that did far more harm than good, particularly since any "good" it did was highly questionable.
You know the old saying, "numbers don't lie"? Well they don't. But they sure can be manipulated.
