Yea, most people find out they're further left than the party line has fed them. Being all the way to the right is kind of kookie.
There are some people on this forum who would be comfortable and happy in the company of Mugabe and Stalin, - and no doubt, they are - but would they tell me why Pope Benedict XVI belongs with them and those two worthies?
kerrie, since I don't believe this 'test' is valid, where I think I would place the Pope is a moot point.
But no matter how anti-Catholic, anti-religion, anti-decency and anti-Christian one is, placing Pope Benedict with Stalin, Abbas and Mugabe in the same category is nothing short of absurd.
Unless he is accompanied by Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama.
kerrie, since I don't believe this 'test' is valid, where I think I would place the Pope is a moot point.
But no matter how anti-Catholic, anti-religion, anti-decency and anti-Christian one is, placing Pope Benedict with Stalin, Abbas and Mugabe in the same category is nothing short of absurd.
Unless he is accompanied by Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama.
kerrie, as a Catholic you know that in our Church the Pope is, has to be, by definition, authoritarian. Roman Catholicism is NOT a smorgasbord, where you take what you like, and criticize the rest.
For that reason, alone this test is a fraud.
This may surprise some people (it somewhat surprised me), but after answering all questions as honestly as I could, I ended up with this
Political Compass Printable Graph
Me, either.I'm not surprised at all.
I did. Pay attention.There are some people on this forum who would be comfortable and happy in the company of Mugabe and Stalin, - and no doubt, they are - but would they tell me why Pope Benedict XVI belongs with them and those two worthies?
........... like your comprehension of political science. Exactly. Good for a laugh.kerrie, for you to say that you must have been right at his side when Pope Benedict XVI gave his answers on this phony 'test'. Also, right there, next to Stalin, Mugabe and Mamoud Abbas.
I hope that AnnaG kept you good company in your travels.
This 'test' is about as valid as a three-dollar bill. Good for a laugh, though!
So where do you feel his views fit and why?
.... which means he hasn't a clue.kerrie, since I don't believe this 'test' is valid, where I think I would place the Pope is a moot point.
Only if you cannot understand that two people with completely different characters can share the same political ideologies.But no matter how anti-Catholic, anti-religion, anti-decency and anti-Christian one is, placing Pope Benedict with Stalin, Abbas and Mugabe in the same category is nothing short of absurd.
The pope? Not even close.Unless he is accompanied by Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama.
lmao Like I said, incapable of understanding polisci.kerrie, as a Catholic you know that in our Church the Pope is, has to be, by definition, authoritarian. Roman Catholicism is NOT a smorgasbord, where you take what you like, and criticize the rest.
For that reason, alone this test is a fraud.
YJ said:kerrie, I sincerely and most humbly apologize for mispelling your name.
So because other people misspell your net name, you have to misspell Karrie's? That is freakin childish.kerrie, I sincerely and most humbly apologize for mispelling your name.
It was done with no less respect than what is displayed by those lazy bums who constantly and repeatedly abbreviate other people's names.
Grow up, child. Polisci is the common shortened form of "political science".AnnaG, what in the Heck is "polisci"? Are you incapable of using your mother tongue correctly?
kerrie, as a Catholic you know that in our Church the Pope is, has to be, by definition, authoritarian. Roman Catholicism is NOT a smorgasbord, where you take what you like, and criticize the rest.
For that reason, alone this test is a fraud.