Pluto close-up: Spacecraft makes flyby of icy, mystery world after journey of 9 years

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,415
9,575
113
Washington DC
No. The European Space Agency did. Nothing to do with the EU.

Nope. The European Space Agency mission control in Darmstadt lost it.

Of course, the British have a long way to go to reach the level of America's series of Mars mission failures. As of 2010, of 38 launch attempts to reach the planet, only 19 have succeeded.
How many of yours have succeeded?

Let me clarify. I'm asking how many Briddish Mars missions have actually succeeded in the real world, not how many "would have" suceeded in the dim reaches of your fantasies.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,944
1,910
113
Not a good record.


So far, there's only been ONE lander on Mars from Britain - the only country ever to provide a Martian rover other than the USA and USSR. Nobody is too sure what happened to Beagle 2, other than that it definitely landed on the Martian surface. Whatever happened to it the blame most likely lies with Mission Control.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,415
9,575
113
Washington DC
So far, there's only been ONE lander on Mars from Britain - the only country ever to provide a Martian rover other than the USA and USSR. Nobody is too sure what happened to Beagle 2, other than that it definitely landed on the Martian surface. Whatever happened to it the blame most likely lies with Mission Control.
So, we have a 50% failure rate and you have a 100% failure rate.

Yep, you sure showed us!
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
No. The European Space Agency did. Nothing to do with the EU.

And little to do with briddin.

Nope. The European Space Agency mission control in Darmstadt lost it.

And all to do with briddin.

The Briddish can't even land a static probe on Mars. Meanwhile the US has had rovers doing donuts on Mars for years.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,705
14,390
113
Low Earth Orbit
So far, there's only been ONE lander on Mars from Britain - the only country ever to provide a Martian rover other than the USA and USSR. Nobody is too sure what happened to Beagle 2, other than that it definitely landed on the Martian surface. Whatever happened to it the blame most likely lies with Mission Control.

You are good at crashing. Stellar in fact.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
So far, there's only been ONE lander on Mars from Britain - the only country ever to provide a Martian rover other than the USA and USSR. Nobody is too sure what happened to Beagle 2, other than that it definitely landed on the Martian surface. Whatever happened to it the blame most likely lies with Mission Control.

Beagle 2 wasn't even a rover. All it had to do was land and deploy. Yet instead the briddish crashed it into the surface.

Of course, the British have a long way to go to reach the level of America's series of Mars mission failures. As of 2010, of 38 launch attempts to reach the planet, only 19 have succeeded.

Would by chance any other countries be involved in those launch attempts?

Don't lump your failures into NASAs successes.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
The dumb azzes from Briddin couldn't even land oversized DVDs on Mars.




Meanwhile...

 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,944
1,910
113
And little to do with briddin.



And all to do with briddin.

The Briddish can't even land a static probe on Mars. Meanwhile the US has had rovers doing donuts on Mars for years.


The Soviets and even the Chinese sent rovers to Mars before the Americans did. And the Americans only just beat the Europeans to it.