They don't eat enough pizza, and it messes with their brains.
Another one of your stellar posts, not. You look kind of trapped in you ability to respond to posts with anything but your usual troll mode. Too fuking stupid to even get it in the right thread. You are showing sign of internet stalking, good I have a way of dealing with assholes such as yourself.
If that was your best shot you have already lost the battle bitch.
There are some people who were sexually abused in a way that made them love their abuser. That trait lasts a lifetime and that group is the one that cannot be cured and they go on to commit the same crimes their abuser did. That fit your past because you are bound and determined that there is no such thing as a bad pedo.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...s-you-dont-hear-about-regarding-clergy-sexual
There are a lot more myths than facts bantered around about clergy sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. Here are 6 important points that you should know if you are interested in this topic.
1. Catholic clergy aren't more likely to abuse children than other clergy or men in general.
2. Clergy sexual abuse in the Catholic Church can't be blamed on celibacy. Not having sex doesn't make children the object of one's desire.
3. Clergy sexual abuse in the Catholic Church can't be blamed on homosexuality.
4. Clergy sexual abuse in the Catholic Church can't be blamed on an all male clergy.
5. Almost all of clergy sexual abuse cases in the Catholic Church that we hear about in the news are from decades ago (usually the 1960's and 70's).
6. Most clergy sex offenders aren't pedophiles.
[youtube]oJhHwspZGcg[/youtube]
Milo Yiannopoulos defends pedophilia and pedophiles.
Milo
probably got pleasured so much by that priest that he's still emotionally attached to him after 2 decades. He won't give much information .
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...d-apple-priests-who-the-pedophiles-really-are
From media reports, one might infer that Catholic priests commit most
pedophilia. In fact, only a tiny fraction of child sex abusers are priests.
We know who the pedophiles are from the National Sexual
Health Survey (NSHS), a large, comprehensive study of American
sexuality based on in-depth interviews in 1996 with a representative sample of 8,400 Americans, age 18 to 88. Although the data are 14 years old, sexual behavior rarely changes quickly, so this survey can be considered reasonably current. The NSHS asked about sexual
abuse: Have you ever felt forced or frightened into having sex?
Seven percent of respondents reported such feelings, 15 percent of the women, and 3 percent of the men. These figures agree with previous surveys.
Victims were asked at what age(s) they were molested. Abuse spanned all ages from 3 to 17, but victims were most likely to be 6 to 10, or 14 to 17. Teens accounted for 49 percent of victims, 6 to 10 year olds, 34 percent.
Ninety-five percent of the abusers were men.
Abusers' ages ranged from 10 to 70. But half--48 percent--were in their twenties. Eighteen percent were in their thirties, 15 percent were in their forties, and all other age groups accounted for 19 percent.
Who were the molesters? NSHS categories included: strangers, dates, friends or acquaintances,
parents, step-parents, other relatives, and others. Dates, friends, and acquaintances comprised the largest group of assailants (38 percent), followed by non-parent relatives (23 percent), others (15 percent), strangers (10 percent), parents (6 percent), and step-parents (4 percent).
Victims under 12 were typically abused by caregivers: parents, step-parents, other relatives, babysitters, or camp or recreational-program staff. Teens were generally abused by friends or acquaintances.
Under "other," the NSHS asked: Who? Surprisingly, not one victim mentioned a priest. Most of the abusers in this category were teachers, neighbors, doctors, grandparents, a parent's friend or coworker, or an adult around the house: a gardener, or repairman.
Not a single priest. I emphasize this not to exculpate pedophile priests, but rather to elucidate the reality of this crime. While celibacy and sexual repression may contribute to Catholic priests' risk for pedophilia,
child sexual exploitation is most often triggered by proximity to children and the opportunity to exercise authority over them. It's more likely to happen in the child's home than outside it. The perpetrator is most likely to be someone the child and parents know, for younger children, a
caregiver, for teens, a social contact.
I hope the Catholic Church can end priestly child sexual abuse. But the NSHS shows that priest account for only a tiny fraction of this problem. In my humble opinion, parents are too trusting of the adults--particularly young adults--who care for their children.
Now I'm not saying parents should quarantine kids. My children attended preschool, after-school programs, and camps staffed by young adults, and thrived.
But parent should monitor the adults, especially the young adults, who supervise their children. Don't assume your kids are safe simply because they're home. Teach your children the difference between welcome touch and frightening touch. Teach them to report the latter promptly. Don't assume your teens are safe simply because they're out with friends. Encourage them to tell you if they ever feel sexually threatened.
The problem of child sexual abuse is much larger than bad apples in the priesthood. As the NSHS clearly shows, we're dealing with bad apples potentially anywhere.
The article says no Priest were mentioned but the RCC itself admits such abused can and do happen and they are not prosecuted by the State or the Church.
I agree; you guys with sick minds can't argue anything. The two of you are like fuk buddies.
You should have more pizza.
You are the one that keeps bringing it up in every thread you post on. Pedos are defended with a passion by you only certain people do not condemn abuse of children that has lifelong consequences that are similar to what your rabid posts show. Next you will be blaming the victims.
Our posts include various articles and vids on the subject. 100% of your posts are to discredit the poster while not touching what is poster. The answer to why is obvious to everyone but you, do the math on what that means.
Ah, yes, it's the evil Zionists, the Jewish Bankers.
They probably make pizza without bacon, too.
With you passionate defense of the most vile crimes against children you might as well get the same update they god from God about what food is clean.
Ac:10:11-16:
And saw heaven opened,
and a certain vessel descending unto him,
as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners,
and let down to the earth:
Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth,
and wild beasts,
and creeping things,
and fowls of the air.
And there came a voice to him,
Rise,
Peter;
kill, and eat.
But Peter said,
Not so,
Lord;
for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.
And the voice spake unto him again the second time,
What God hath cleansed,
that call not thou common.
This was done thrice:
and the vessel was received up again into heaven.
I can hardly wait for you to claim God is wrong and the Jews are right about what is included as kosher food,
