Parliament prorogued

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,620
109
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
She didn't give in to anything, Scratch. The way parliament has been of late, a break is needed. I want to see plans from both the coalition & harper for the economy, I think we deserve that.

Funny thing was that I just thought we had a break.... we got back into an active government, only to have it fall apart within days.... .now we're back into another break?

Give me a Break. ;-)
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,620
109
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Every legal means, hell define "Legal" as it pertains to the Conservatives :D

Seriously, if Harper gets enough people frothing at the mouth about the "danger" our country is in he could pull out the damn War Measures act just like the last time time the separatists got uppity :D

He obviously has no problems suspending democratic process as it stands

Exactly... Democracy Delayed is Democracy Denied.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,424
9,699
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
What she did was the ideal solution. If cooler heads can prevail, perhaps the main 3 Canadian parties can work together to come to some sort of compromise on the upcoming budget.

Main 3? By Seats that would be the Conservatives & Liberals & the Bloc...That would
leave the NDP as the wallflower at the dance? Which three are the main 3?
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Funny thing was that I just thought we had a break.... we got back into an active government, only to have it fall apart within days.... .now we're back into another break?

Give me a Break. ;-)

We didn't have this madness preceding the last break of government.

All sides need to take a step back and try to work together on this, if not, we should head back to the polls.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Main 3? By Seats that would be the Conservatives & Liberals & the Bloc...That would
leave the NDP as the wallflower at the dance? Which three are the main 3?

I said National. That would exclude the bloc.

We need consensus among the parties that represent all of Canada.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
It was definitely the wrong decision. By proroguing the Parliament, GG has clearly taken sides in the debate, she has sided with Harper, she has helped him dodge the bullet by at least tow months (incidentally does he have to come back at end of January, or can he prolong it? I assume he will prolong it as long as he can).

Now for at least two months we don’t’ have a democracy, we have a dictator, a dictator who doesn’t have support of the Parliament.

So what can we look forward to now? Conservatives will unleash the dirtiest, most vicious, most virulent campaign we have ever seen, to trash the three opposition parties. The budget will very likely be defeated, because of course it will contain all the goodies conservatives want, none that opposition wants. It will be a highly partisan budget in true Harper style, comparable to the financial statement.

But whereas Harper was able to dodge the bullet now, he won’t be able to dodge the bullet when he brings the budget (supposedly by end of January, but I have my doubts about that).

Anyway, now we can look forward to a political campaign for the next two months, where smearing, character assassination, innuendos and outright lies on the part of Conservatives will be the order of the day. I assume they hope to bully the opposition into voting for their Messiah.

Well, time will tell if their strategy succeeds. But for now, for the first time in history of Canada, we have a dictatorship, a dictator who does not enjoy the support of the Parliament. Truly a black day for Canada.

Incidentally, I just thought of a new nick name for Harper. From now on, I will be referring to him as Fidel Harper.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,620
109
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
What exactly is the good thing about pausing?

Our economic crisis can now get worse with NO ONE paying attention to it.

The problem will still be there when he gets back.

Even if the coalition falls appart, he still doesn't control parliment and all that means is another election instead of a government, meaning the economic situation still isn't being dealt with.

This is the worst situation. Either allow the coalition to govern or publically say if the government falls you will call an election and let the Coalition decide on confidence issues with that in mind.

Which I also completely agree with.

Although an election would waste more time and more money, it was still better then delaying the government some more.... but still not any better then allowing the Coalition to take place.

This solves nothing, does nothing and the situation everybody wants to have resolved will just keep getting worse.

And there won't be any changes in the end.... we'll just have another month of more Conservative Propaganda..... and now they'll use this decision to somehow make everyone think that they're right and somehow justified in what they just did.

Where the hell did this Republican party come from again?
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
We didn't have this madness preceding the last break of government.

All sides need to take a step back and try to work together on this, if not, we should head back to the polls.

It is not in Fidel’s nature to work together with opposition parties. I don’t see him reaching out to anybody except to his political advisors on how to launch a smear campaign for the next two months.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
It might be a pipe dream but I prefer that then to just handing over power to a coalition which has offered only vague ideas as to there economic plan.

It ain’t happening. Fidel’s only hope is that his smear campaign, dirty campaign works and he can bully the opposition into voting for him. Failing that, my hope would be that GG gives the opposition an opportunity to form a government.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
These politicians all operate at the same basic level, there isn't a single one of them with a shred of dignity or respect, except maybe duceppe who is doing what he does to further the interests of Quebec.
 

Adriatik

Electoral Member
Oct 31, 2008
125
3
18
Montreal
I don't know what was said during their meeting but I'm sure Harper continued with his campaign of lies... I guess her Excellency fell for it.

This doesn't change anything however. The House will not have more confidence in Harper and the Conservatives when parliament re-opens.

All this means is that Harper is stalling the progress of the country, playing a dangerous game with the economy, and wasting valuable time we don't have.

What a selfish , shameless bastard!

If he was as good a leader as you rightists say he is, he would have already accepted defeat and allowed MPs to work NOW on the economy.

Quite frankly, he's deliberately sinking the economic ship and he will try to blame it on the coalition. We cannot afford to have this madman playing games with our jobs and well-being.
 

Vanni Fucci

Senate Member
Dec 26, 2004
5,239
17
38
8th Circle, 7th Bolgia
the-brights.net
It might be a pipe dream but I prefer that then to just handing over power to a coalition which has offered only vague ideas as to there economic plan.

The only one that needed to know about those plans right now was Michaëlle Jean. She didn't even take their proposal into consideration, or she would have met with the leaders and heard what they had to offer...
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
You know, if your going to exclude Quebecs elected representatives because you don't like them, then they have every right to seperate.

There are other issues than Seperation the bloc stands for, like women's rights. One of the key reasons they opposed the conservatives was the conservatives assaults on Pay Equity.

Im against seperation, and as such I won't vote for it. But if we are going to deny their votes if they don't vote for who we want, then I may change my stance and support their seperation.

They deserve representation like everyone else.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
You know, if your going to exclude Quebecs elected representatives because you don't like them, then they have every right to seperate.

There are other issues than Seperation the bloc stands for, like women's rights. One of the key reasons they opposed the conservatives was the conservatives assaults on Pay Equity.

Im against seperation, and as such I won't vote for it. But if we are going to deny their votes if they don't vote for who we want, then I may change my stance and support their seperation.

They deserve representation like everyone else.

National means the country as a whole, the Bloc isn't the sole representative of Quebec like Harper doesn't speak for all Canadians.
 

Risus

Genius
May 24, 2006
5,373
25
38
Toronto
Which I also completely agree with.

Although an election would waste more time and more money, it was still better then delaying the government some more.... but still not any better then allowing the Coalition to take place.

This solves nothing, does nothing and the situation everybody wants to have resolved will just keep getting worse.

And there won't be any changes in the end.... we'll just have another month of more Conservative Propaganda..... and now they'll use this decision to somehow make everyone think that they're right and somehow justified in what they just did.

Where the hell did this Republican party come from again?

Explain how Bob Rae can say he will vote against the budget, even though he doesn't have a clue what will be in it. All he is interested in is grabbing power.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Good decision by G.G. - When solving problems you can't generally go wrong with trying the simplest cheapest solution first. The last thing we need is somejerk reaction like spending $300 million - Harper should at least be given the opportunity to lay out a budget (you don't do that in a week) and then if it's no good then there is still the opportunity to give the Stooges their kick at the can.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
"Explain how Bob Rae can say he will vote against the budget, even though he doesn't have a clue what will be in it. All he is interested in is grabbing power."- Exactly. Of course Bob Rae doesn't have a history of being an astute money handler.