RE: Palestinian hero kidn
Hehehe your responses are getting shorter, I smell victory:
True, i admit that, i went a little too far, but you still a fascist.
I'm a fascist? You can divine this without knowing the person I am? You've never spoken to me outside of a control internet environment, yet you have the gaul to pass judgement on me? I can assure you that I am most certainly
NOT a fascist (then again, you deem everyone who doesn't agree with you as a fascist). The definition of Fascism:
Fascism
"A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong, centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism." (From The American Heritage Dictionary)
That isn't me at all aeon. Then again, how could you know that when you don't even know
ME?
I know israel could get rid of the entire palestine if they wanted , but so far , they did a pretty good job.
Ok whoa here Captain backpeddle. In a previous post, you deemed that Israel doesn't want peace with Palestine:
Israel never believe in peace, ariel sharon is responsible for this whole mess, israel never showed any sign they wanted peace, never and ever.
Then later on in this thread you did an utter flipflop and deemed that if Israel
wanted to, they could destroy Palestine. So which is it? Do the Israeli's want peace or not? There is no grey area on this aeon, it's black and white. I've been pointing out all along that Israel has been holding back for decades, there has been nothing stopping them from blowing away Palestine, nothing except their desire to stop the fighting and live in peace. Just when things are calm and getting close, some idiots blow themselves up, or as in this case, abduct a soldier for shock value. Palestinians keep perpetuating the violence. Now look at where that's gotten them? IDF tanks in Gaza. Cause and effect aeon.
What governement knows exactly that we don't know? that satan came in palestine and iraq, and now all of them are demon?
Still no evidence who is behind the event, but we are still in afganisthan, for reason which is still unknown,except the governement, pretty ridicoulus your arguments.
Your first sentance makes absolutely
NO sense what so ever. I've read it 5 times over and I can't make any sense out of it. Can someone please translate loser-speak to English for me?
As for the 2nd sentance, there has been
PLENTY of evidence aeon, you've just chosen not to read/listen to it. Hell, Mr. Bin Laden himself appeared on international television and told the West to go f.uck itself and claimed that Al-qaeda had carried out the attacks. People on these forums have been telling you this since I first started posting here. Yet you don't want to believe it, and that's your hang-up not mine buddy. My arguments make perfect sense. If the elected body, tells me something, i'm inclined to believe them, given the position they're in to make such calls. You, on the other hand, don't believe anything unless you can google it. Who's stance is more ridiculous aeon?
Yes it does, in canada, our government, doesnt bulldoze a home to give it to someone else that comes from russia or europe.
I'm still not sure as to what your point is, especially regarding 100,000 "close friends" of yours whom you can personally vouch for. Care to explain yourself in full on this one, as your mish-mash of frenglish has utterly confused me.
So, they didnt do anything in here,they have a normal life.
Once again, how can you vouch for 100,000 you don't know? How do you know that every single one of them is a perfect human being? How do you know that one isn't a rapist? Or a murderer? Or a thief? To reiterate, you cannot vouch for 100,000 people you've never met aeon. That's intellecually bankrupt, and i'm sure everyone on these forums will agree with me.
Only alquada , they apperently stopped financing them, but there is suspeicion they still, also, saudi still and always financed, hamas, hellzbolllah.
After 9-11, fbi couldnt access saudi terrorist family for investigation, it took about 6 month, they also were very reluctant to freeze the assets
What the hell everything you mention this has to do with being moderate?? nothing at all, yes saudi arabia is the worst regardings rights of women, get inform your self and it is about time.
How people like those in people in the saudi gov get away with this??
You're missing the point (as per usual) aeon. I'm not discussing their political affiliation, or their adherance to their religion. I'm talking about moderation. The Saudi's have a long-standing tradition of good rapport with the West. They've cooperated on numerous occasions with us, hell they even helped defeat Iraq in 90-91. That's my point. That and a direct corelation between backwards Islamic States and Prosperous Islamic States. If you look it aeon, there is a direct corelation between the level of Islamic Fanaticism and the Social Standing of the State in question. E.g.:
United Arab Emirates vs Palestine
Regardless, that's what i'm talking about aeon, moderation in their dealings with
non-islamic nations.
As for your links:
1. Doesn't work
2. Did you actually
READ the article? Or were there too many big words for you? The whole point to the article is to highlight that you cannot sue an organization that doesn't fall under your legal system. The Saudi High Commission isn't subject to U.S. Federal Law aeon.