Palestinian hero kidnapped israeli soldier

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
#juan said:
I've got to say that kidnapping that soldier was a big mistake. Israel will bomb the shit out of every Palestinian they can get their sights on until he is free. If he turns up dead they will bomb even more. Israel doesn't recognise anything remotely like the Geneva Convention. They will use this as an excuse to kill as many Palestinians as possible.

Possibly. Hopefully not.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
LittleRunningGag said:
aeon said:
Israel has to stop playing hypocryte, the west has to recognize israel governement as a terrorist, israel has to show real motivation to peace, until then there is no peace solution at all.

:roll:

I don't know why I bother. Grow up, read some news papers, educate yourself.


You consider reading news papers as educating yourself?? :roll: you are a funny person.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
#juan said:
I've got to say that kidnapping that soldier was a big mistake. Israel will bomb the shit out of every Palestinian they can get their sights on until he is free. If he turns up dead they will bomb even more. Israel doesn't recognise anything remotely like the Geneva Convention. They will use this as an excuse to kill as many Palestinians as possible.


Since israel doesnt care about anything, i hope palestinians militant gave this israeli soldier a very bad time, and i mean it.
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
aeon said:
LittleRunningGag said:
aeon said:
Israel has to stop playing hypocryte, the west has to recognize israel governement as a terrorist, israel has to show real motivation to peace, until then there is no peace solution at all.

:roll:

I don't know why I bother. Grow up, read some news papers, educate yourself.


You consider reading news papers as educating yourself?? :roll: you are a funny person.

No, I consider reading newspapers being aware of the world around me (remember that thread about JTF2?). If you don't read newspapers, you won't know what is happening in the world. You can't simply rely on your conspiracy theory websites to adequetly provide you with the information a person requires to form an informed opinion about world issues.

Besides, if you only have one perspective to draw from, you may find your opinion a little skewed. Just like the people who refuse to read newspapers that have a different bias than there's, a bit of a skewed perspective.
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
aeon said:
#juan said:
I've got to say that kidnapping that soldier was a big mistake. Israel will bomb the shit out of every Palestinian they can get their sights on until he is free. If he turns up dead they will bomb even more. Israel doesn't recognise anything remotely like the Geneva Convention. They will use this as an excuse to kill as many Palestinians as possible.


Since israel doesnt care about anything, i hope palestinians militant gave this israeli soldier a very bad time, and i mean it.

Of course Israel cares about things. They care about keeping their citizens safe from suicide attacks. They care about keeping their soldiers safe from wanton kidnappings. They care about maintaining their sovereignty. They care about all the things that the rest of us around the world care about.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
LittleRunningGag said:
No, I consider reading newspapers being aware of the world around me (remember that thread about JTF2?). If you don't read newspapers, you won't know what is happening in the world. You can't simply rely on your conspiracy theory websites to adequetly provide you with the information a person requires to form an informed opinion about world issues.

Besides, if you only have one perspective to draw from, you may find your opinion a little skewed. Just like the people who refuse to read newspapers that have a different bias than there's, a bit of a skewed perspective.


News isnt about only JFT2 , yes i read news papers on a daily basis from many point of view, i even read stupid news papers like the "Globe and mail", mostly to get a laugh at, still nothing in the news convince me that JFT2 were only in iraq to rescue peoples.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
LittleRunningGag said:
They care about keeping their soldiers safe from wanton kidnappings. .


Well , why then have they attacked just like they did? that was just a provocation,they know what the palestinians militant will do to their soldier, they will kill him, that is a fact, and then israel will turn around and say look how bad they are, and the cycle of violence will just continues.
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
aeon said:
News isnt about only JFT2 , yes i read news papers on a daily basis from many point of view, i even read stupid news papers like the "Globe and mail", mostly to get a laugh at, still nothing in the news convince me that JFT2 were only in iraq to rescue peoples.

Well obviously you don't. If you truely did read newspapers, you would have already known about those events. If you paid attention to anything around you, you would have known about them. It was on the news, and on the front pages for a week.

Well , why then have they attacked just like they did? that was just a provocation,they know what the palestinians militant will do to their soldier, they will kill him, that is a fact, and then israel will turn around and say look how bad they are, and the cycle of violence will just continues.

Because they can't pander to the demands of terrorists. If they do that they are inviting more activities like this. If this one soldier dies, that would be bad. But if this one soldier is only a prelude to more people being kidnapped and killed, that would be worse.

Over the last year, before the election of Hamas, the Israelis and Palestinians were making great strides in the effort towards peace. The election of Hamas has destroyed all that work. Israel has put forth the olive branch and seen it swatted away. They tried.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
LittleRunningGag said:
Well obviously you don't. If you truely did read newspapers, you would have already known about those events. If you paid attention to anything around you, you would have known about them. It was on the news, and on the front pages for a week.

No it wasnt in front page of the news.I live in montreal.
That goes also for you, if you would have paid attention in the last 5 years , regardings palestinians-israelis conflict, you would have seen that israel has constantly agressed palestinians, that was in front page of the news for the latst 5 years, at the least.

Today in "" le devoir"" the front page says, "" israel takes extremes steps ,by again violating human rights""


LittleRunningGag said:
Because they can't pander to the demands of terrorists. If they do that they are inviting more activities like this. If this one soldier dies, that would be bad. But if this one soldier is only a prelude to more people being kidnapped and killed, that would be worse.

Over the last year, before the election of Hamas, the Israelis and Palestinians were making great strides in the effort towards peace. The election of Hamas has destroyed all that work. Israel has put forth the olive branch and seen it swatted away. They tried.


Israelis werent making great strides in the effort towards peace, total bullstrawberry crap,sharon is the responsible for this whole infitada,that is a fact, they always has a right to attack , whatever the reason is.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Palestinian hero kidnapped israeli soldier

aeon said:
Colpy said:
Aeon said
as long as they respect geneva convention regardings prisoners

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You've GOT to be kidding! :D :lol: 8O

Edited to say:
Tell you what, Aeon, IF this unfortunate kid turns up alive without escaping or being rescued by Israeli troops, I will offer you a public and heartfelt apology.

If he appears under any circumstances alive and NOT mistreated, I will not only apologize, but will refrain from criticizing any of your posts for 30 days, and will publically declare you to have a superior intellect.

In return, if this kid turns up dead or tortured, you will do a post (just one) critical of the Palestinians, and praising the Israelis. Makes it a bet of dollars against doughnuts.

Agreed?



Apperently our deal doesnt work anymore, since israel just did a recent devastated attacks.

Israel reoccupied areas of southern Gaza yesterday and bombed bridges and an electricity plant to force Palestinian militants to free the abducted soldier. The electricity supply for half of Gaza has been cut and all supplies of fuel and food have been halted.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1808768,00.html


Well since israel is cutting all supplies of food and fuel, that gives green light to palestinians militant to do what they want with the kidnapped soldier.

Oh, I SEE.

You were yapping on about the Geneva Conventions, not me. Do you think the requirements for decent treatment do not apply because the war is on-going?

Meanwhile, as this poor Israeli kid is tortured and murdered while in Palestinian custody, Palestinian kids purposely break the law in front of Israeli soldiers so they will have the ENJOYMENT of a stay in an Israeli prison with books, TV, soccer, ping-pong.

WHO is behaving indecently?

Come on Aeon, live up to our agreement.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
ADC Press Release:


Palestinian Prisoners on Hunger Strike


Washington, D.C.,Anguished by the current conditions in Israeli prisons in which they are kept, approximately 1,500 Palestinian prisoners went on a hunger strike this past Sunday. They have been joined by other prisoners bringing the number of those on the hunger strike to approximately 2,264. Prisoner's rights groups and families of those serving in the facilities also participated in sit down protests. According to the Palestinian Prisoner's Affairs Minster, Hisham Abdelrazaq, "this hunger strike is not a political strike," instead he added, "it's a strike about basic fundamental rights."

The protest calls on Israeli officials to address a wide range of issues concerning the inhumane treatment of prisoners by guards, as well as the overall harsh and deplorable conditions of the prisons themselves. The prisoners are requesting the cessation of humiliating and unnecessary strip searches, more frequent family visits, improving sanitary conditions, installing public telephones, providing better medical care, allowing prisoners to pursue their education by registering at Palestinian and foreign universities, reducing prison crowding, and "ending the policy of beating detainees en route to courts."

In response to these demonstrations, Israeli officials have declared psychological warfare and imposed even further restrictions on those participating in the hunger strike by confiscating radios and temporarily terminating all visits. Moreover, Israeli prison officials have stated that they plan to hold barbecues and eat near the Palestinian prisoners' cells. Security Minister Tzahi Hanegbi commented, "As far as I'm concerned they can strike for a day, a month, until death. We will ward off this strike and it will be as if it never happened."

In 2003, the International Federation of Human Rights, in cooperation with several Israeli and Palestinian human rights groups, released a report on Israel's treatment of Palestinian detainees and prisoners. The report concluded that there were "flagrant violations" of human rights. Amnesty International has also released a report on the conditions of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails. To read Amnesty's report see:
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engmde150742002

Additionally, in the mid 1990's, B'tselem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, issued a report entitled "Neither Law Nor Justice" in which they describe the Israeli methods of torture. Female prisoners also gave testimonies about sexual abuse and flagrant abuse of private parts of their body. For more information, see:
http://www.btselem.org

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) is deeply troubled by the conditions which the Palestinian prisoners are forced to endure and by the Israeli government's reaction. ADC President Mary Rose Oakar stated "This kind of treatment of prisoners bears similarities to the Abu Ghraib prison torture scandal. We call on the Administration, Congress, as well as Human Rights organizations to take action and express their deep concern against these human rights violations."

link
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
aeon, have you read the Hamas Charter? A couple of brief excerpts for you:

Hamas regards Nationalism (Wataniyya) as part and parcel of the religious faith. Nothing is loftier or deeper in Nationalism than waging Jihad against the enemy and confronting him when he sets foot on the land of the Muslims.

[Peace] initiatives, the so-called peaceful solutions, and the international conferences to resolve the Palestinian problem, are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement. For renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion; the nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its faith, the movement educates its members to adhere to its principles and to raise the banner of Allah over their homeland as they fight their Jihad:

And most importantly:

There is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by Jihad. The initiatives, proposals and International Conferences are but a waste of time, an exercise in futility. The Palestinian people are too noble to have their future, their right and their destiny submitted to a vain game.

What say you about the intent of the Palestinian Peoples? In electing Hamas, they elected a group of murderers who's sole purpose is the destruction of Israel and all "unbelievers" who are in the "promised land."

Israel had pulled out of Palestinian territory as per the agreements made between Sharon and the Palestinians. The Israeli army has warned (through leaflets) Palestinian citizens before attacking. Which group looks worse in this situation?
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
aeon said:
No it wasnt in front page of the news.I live in montreal.

Do you watch the news? Do you watch the CBC? It was on the CBC, I saw it. Any news organization that didn't show it isn't worth paying attention to. I find it rather hard to believe that the entirety of the Montreal news media completely ignored the capture and rescue of the vollenteers.

Not to mention that you said earlier that you read the G&M. It was in the G&M as well. Quite a bit, in fact.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
LittleRunningGag said:
aeon, have you read the Hamas Charter? A couple of brief excerpts for you:

Hamas regards Nationalism (Wataniyya) as part and parcel of the religious faith. Nothing is loftier or deeper in Nationalism than waging Jihad against the enemy and confronting him when he sets foot on the land of the Muslims.


Most current Likud members support the Israeli settlements in the West Bank and oppose Palestinian statehood and disengagement from Gaza, and more importantly support agression against palestinians, the last 5 years in israel proves it.Yes hamas are radicals, but also leaders from political party in israel are also radicals.


LittleRunningGag said:
[Peace] initiatives, the so-called peaceful solutions, and the international conferences to resolve the Palestinian problem, are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement. For renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion; the nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its faith, the movement educates its members to adhere to its principles and to raise the banner of Allah over their homeland as they fight their Jihad:

Palestinians doesnt have to renouncing any part of palestine, because this land belongs to them, period.



LittleRunningGag said:
And most importantly:

There is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by Jihad. The initiatives, proposals and International Conferences are but a waste of time, an exercise in futility. The Palestinian people are too noble to have their future, their right and their destiny submitted to a vain game.

There is no solution to the israelis problems, except constantly agressing already oppressed poors peoples which are the palestinians, throwing rocks at tanks, is considered as terrorist, completly devastating a region with the help of rocket launcher, helicopter, airforce,artillery and bulldozer is considered as self-defense.Wow, one thing we can't argue about isreal, is they have a pretty fucking strong propaganda machine spread all over the world, succeding to put the blame on oppressed peoples.

LittleRunningGag said:
What say you about the intent of the Palestinian Peoples? In electing Hamas, they elected a group of murderers who's sole purpose is the destruction of Israel and all "unbelievers" who are in the "promised land."

Promise land, who the hell promise a land to anyone??

They elected hamas, because when you know the situation of palestinians, you understand very well,palestinians are tired being screwed by the west which do nothing, all they saw is the west turning a blind eye on israel, the fact that israel violated 65 un resolution ( about 5 times of saddam violated)proves it, so they decided to elect a radical party that is an ennemy of the west, simple as that.


LittleRunningGag said:
Israel had pulled out of Palestinian territory as per the agreements made between Sharon and the Palestinians. The Israeli army has warned (through leaflets) Palestinian citizens before attacking. Which group looks worse in this situation?


Read #juan post about israel.

Now who look worse now?
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
LittleRunningGag said:
aeon said:
No it wasnt in front page of the news.I live in montreal.

Do you watch the news? Do you watch the CBC? It was on the CBC, I saw it. Any news organization that didn't show it isn't worth paying attention to. I find it rather hard to believe that the entirety of the Montreal news media completely ignored the capture and rescue of the vollenteers.

Not to mention that you said earlier that you read the G&M. It was in the G&M as well. Quite a bit, in fact.


Sorry i don't watch tv, cbc though is a very good network, i downloaded a lot of report from this network,they are not perfect but they did a pretty good job in the last 5 years,still with everything they say on jft2 from everything i read in the news papers, i am still not convinced that they are there for the good reasons.
 

Champloo

Nominee Member
Jun 29, 2006
96
0
6
RE: Palestinian hero kidn

Aeon, you aren't a very good debator, my friend.

Saying "This land is theirs, period" means nothing. Have facts to support your argument.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
RE: Palestinian hero kidn

Hehehe your responses are getting shorter, I smell victory:

True, i admit that, i went a little too far, but you still a fascist.

I'm a fascist? You can divine this without knowing the person I am? You've never spoken to me outside of a control internet environment, yet you have the gaul to pass judgement on me? I can assure you that I am most certainly NOT a fascist (then again, you deem everyone who doesn't agree with you as a fascist). The definition of Fascism:

Fascism
"A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong, centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism." (From The American Heritage Dictionary)

That isn't me at all aeon. Then again, how could you know that when you don't even know ME?

I know israel could get rid of the entire palestine if they wanted , but so far , they did a pretty good job.

Ok whoa here Captain backpeddle. In a previous post, you deemed that Israel doesn't want peace with Palestine:

Israel never believe in peace, ariel sharon is responsible for this whole mess, israel never showed any sign they wanted peace, never and ever.

Then later on in this thread you did an utter flipflop and deemed that if Israel wanted to, they could destroy Palestine. So which is it? Do the Israeli's want peace or not? There is no grey area on this aeon, it's black and white. I've been pointing out all along that Israel has been holding back for decades, there has been nothing stopping them from blowing away Palestine, nothing except their desire to stop the fighting and live in peace. Just when things are calm and getting close, some idiots blow themselves up, or as in this case, abduct a soldier for shock value. Palestinians keep perpetuating the violence. Now look at where that's gotten them? IDF tanks in Gaza. Cause and effect aeon.

What governement knows exactly that we don't know? that satan came in palestine and iraq, and now all of them are demon?

Still no evidence who is behind the event, but we are still in afganisthan, for reason which is still unknown,except the governement, pretty ridicoulus your arguments.

Your first sentance makes absolutely NO sense what so ever. I've read it 5 times over and I can't make any sense out of it. Can someone please translate loser-speak to English for me?

As for the 2nd sentance, there has been PLENTY of evidence aeon, you've just chosen not to read/listen to it. Hell, Mr. Bin Laden himself appeared on international television and told the West to go f.uck itself and claimed that Al-qaeda had carried out the attacks. People on these forums have been telling you this since I first started posting here. Yet you don't want to believe it, and that's your hang-up not mine buddy. My arguments make perfect sense. If the elected body, tells me something, i'm inclined to believe them, given the position they're in to make such calls. You, on the other hand, don't believe anything unless you can google it. Who's stance is more ridiculous aeon?

Yes it does, in canada, our government, doesnt bulldoze a home to give it to someone else that comes from russia or europe.

I'm still not sure as to what your point is, especially regarding 100,000 "close friends" of yours whom you can personally vouch for. Care to explain yourself in full on this one, as your mish-mash of frenglish has utterly confused me.

So, they didnt do anything in here,they have a normal life.

Once again, how can you vouch for 100,000 you don't know? How do you know that every single one of them is a perfect human being? How do you know that one isn't a rapist? Or a murderer? Or a thief? To reiterate, you cannot vouch for 100,000 people you've never met aeon. That's intellecually bankrupt, and i'm sure everyone on these forums will agree with me.

Only alquada , they apperently stopped financing them, but there is suspeicion they still, also, saudi still and always financed, hamas, hellzbolllah.

After 9-11, fbi couldnt access saudi terrorist family for investigation, it took about 6 month, they also were very reluctant to freeze the assets


What the hell everything you mention this has to do with being moderate?? nothing at all, yes saudi arabia is the worst regardings rights of women, get inform your self and it is about time.


How people like those in people in the saudi gov get away with this??

You're missing the point (as per usual) aeon. I'm not discussing their political affiliation, or their adherance to their religion. I'm talking about moderation. The Saudi's have a long-standing tradition of good rapport with the West. They've cooperated on numerous occasions with us, hell they even helped defeat Iraq in 90-91. That's my point. That and a direct corelation between backwards Islamic States and Prosperous Islamic States. If you look it aeon, there is a direct corelation between the level of Islamic Fanaticism and the Social Standing of the State in question. E.g.:

United Arab Emirates vs Palestine

Regardless, that's what i'm talking about aeon, moderation in their dealings with non-islamic nations.

As for your links:

1. Doesn't work

2. Did you actually READ the article? Or were there too many big words for you? The whole point to the article is to highlight that you cannot sue an organization that doesn't fall under your legal system. The Saudi High Commission isn't subject to U.S. Federal Law aeon.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: Palestinian hero kidn

Champloo said:
Aeon, you aren't a very good debator, my friend.

Saying "This land is theirs, period" means nothing. Have facts to support your argument.

Well the fact that the majority of jews immigrated mainly from europe in the begining of 1900 to israel/palestine means yes the land belongs to mainly palestinians, of course there is the natives jews who were about 5 % of the total population, the land belong to them too and so as the other native ethni.
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
aeon said:
There is no solution to the israelis problems, except constantly agressing already oppressed poors peoples which are the palestinians, throwing rocks at tanks, is considered as terrorist, completly devastating a region with the help of rocket launcher, helicopter, airforce,artillery and bulldozer is considered as self-defense.Wow, one thing we can't argue about isreal, is they have a pretty *censored* strong propaganda machine spread all over the world, succeding to put the blame on oppressed peoples.

The current attacks against Palestinian territory are in response to kidnappings and rocket attacks. If someone is trying to hurt you, the best option is to hit them back ten times harder. Its called a deterant.

Promise land, who the hell promise a land to anyone??

I don't know, you'd have to ask Hamas. Its in their charter.

They elected hamas, because when you know the situation of palestinians, you understand very well,palestinians are tired being screwed by the west which do nothing, all they saw is the west turning a blind eye on israel, the fact that israel violated 65 un resolution ( about 5 times of saddam violated)proves it, so they decided to elect a radical party that is an ennemy of the west, simple as that.

Up until they did that they were acheiving great strides on the road to peace. The election of Hamas stopped that. How does the election of Hamas help?

Read #juan post about israel.

Now who look worse now?

Thats prisoner abuse, a completely different issue. Besides,at least the people in Israeli detainment are alive. I don't see anyone there getting killed like that poor Jewish settler that was kidnapped the other day.

Well the fact that the majority of jews immigrated mainly from europe in the begining of 1900 to israel/palestine means yes the land belongs to mainly palestinians, of course there is the natives jews who were about 5 % of the total population, the land belong to them too and so as the other native ethni.

Up until they were expelled by Muslims, around the time of the collaps of the Roman Empire, the Jews were mostly settled in the area of Israel. No one really has a solid, "We were here first," claim on the region.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: Palestinian hero kidn

Mogz said:
I'm a fascist? You can divine this without knowing the person I am? You've never spoken to me outside of a control internet environment, yet you have the gaul to pass judgement on me? I can assure you that I am most certainly NOT a fascist (then again, you deem everyone who doesn't agree with you as a fascist). The definition of Fascism:

Fascism
"A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong, centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism." (From The American Heritage Dictionary)

This is the description of a fascist system,here is the definition of a fascist person.

Fascism is a radical authoritarian political philosophy that combines elements of corporatism, totalitarianism, extreme nationalism, militarism, anti-rationalism, anti-communism and anti-liberalism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

That is pretty close to you

Mogz said:
Ok whoa here Captain backpeddle. In a previous post, you deemed that Israel doesn't want peace with Palestine:

Well when you look at the damage israel has done to palestinians, it is clear they don't want peace, the damage they did to palestinians is something we have never seen since the great wars.


Mogz said:
Then later on in this thread you did an utter flipflop and deemed that if Israel wanted to, they could destroy Palestine. So which is it? Do the Israeli's want peace or not? There is no grey area on this aeon, it's black and white. I've been pointing out all along that Israel has been holding back for decades, there has been nothing stopping them from blowing away Palestine, nothing except their desire to stop the fighting and live in peace. Just when things are calm and getting close, some idiots blow themselves up, or as in this case, abduct a soldier for shock value. Palestinians keep perpetuating the violence. Now look at where that's gotten them? IDF tanks in Gaza. Cause and effect aeon.

Do you realize how many damage israel has done so far?? if you call that they want peace, then you are ""enough said""

cause and effect?? 2 palestinian dig a tunnel, killed soldiers , kidnapped another one, result? israel are ready to kill them all.

You call them idiot by blowing themselves, which i agree, but you are in the army, ready to go in afganisthan, where from the begining there is no evidence that they are behind 9-11, so to summerize, you are ready to kill people for something based on a lie, you know what, that is not better than them.

Mogz said:
Your first sentance makes absolutely NO sense what so ever. I've read it 5 times over and I can't make any sense out of it. Can someone please translate loser-speak to English for me?

As for the 2nd sentance, there has been PLENTY of evidence aeon, you've just chosen not to read/listen to it. Hell, Mr. Bin Laden himself appeared on international television and told the West to go f.uck itself and claimed that Al-qaeda had carried out the attacks. People on these forums have been telling you this since I first started posting here. Yet you don't want to believe it, and that's your hang-up not mine buddy. My arguments make perfect sense. If the elected body, tells me something, i'm inclined to believe them, given the position they're in to make such calls. You, on the other hand, don't believe anything unless you can google it. Who's stance is more ridiculous aeon?

I dont believe it, because it was brought by us officials, not aljeezeerah by the way.

Here is what bin laden said right after 9-11

Immediately after the September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States, the United States government named bin Laden as the prime suspect. However, Osama denied responsibility for the attacks, and in an interview for the Karachi-based Pakistani daily newspaper Ummat, published on September 28, 2001, he stated:


I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. […] The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself […] there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups capable of causing such large-scale destruction.


Why don't you believe this one?? first it wasnt brought by us officials, which means a lot, and not shown to the american public.


In December 2001, U.S. forces in Afghanistan captured a videotape during a raid on a house in Jalalabad, which allegedly shows bin Laden discussing the September 11th attacks with a group of followers. However, the quality of the tape is poor, and the authenticity is disputed by many researchers.

Also according to fbi, oussama bin laden is left handed, on the video, he is suddenly right handed.


Mogz said:
I'm still not sure as to what your point is, especially regarding 100,000 "close friends" of yours whom you can personally vouch for. Care to explain yourself in full on this one, as your mish-mash of frenglish has utterly confused me.

Since palestinians lives normal life in here, then no need to commit terrorist act.



Mogz said:
You're missing the point (as per usual) aeon. I'm not discussing their political affiliation, or their adherance to their religion. I'm talking about moderation. The Saudi's have a long-standing tradition of good rapport with the West. They've cooperated on numerous occasions with us, hell they even helped defeat Iraq in 90-91. That's my point. That and a direct corelation between backwards Islamic States and Prosperous Islamic States. If you look it aeon, there is a direct corelation between the level of Islamic Fanaticism and the Social Standing of the State in question. E.g.:

United Arab Emirates vs Palestine

Regardless, that's what i'm talking about aeon, moderation in their dealings with non-islamic nations.

As for your links:

1. Doesn't work

2. Did you actually READ the article? Or were there too many big words for you? The whole point to the article is to highlight that you cannot sue an organization that doesn't fall under your legal system. The Saudi High Commission isn't subject to U.S. Federal Law aeon.


I am not missing any point, dealing with the west isnt a sign of moderation, where the hell did you get that crap?


As for the links, here they are...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...ode=&contentId=A22088-2002Aug15&notFound=true

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1127811912376



and they work very well.



I did read the article, and yes it is ridicoulus, cause they are suspected to fund alquada, but they have a free pass, i don't think those in guantamobay would have had the same threatment, if they were only suspected to fund terrorist, completly ridicoulus when i think about it, and guys like you doesnt even see anything wrong with this.