Omnibus Russia Ukraine crisis

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,037
8,311
113
Washington DC
It still holds true while the Biden administration is playing politics while not following through on their promises and Ukrainian's die senselessly
The Biden administration, is it?

Do you even know which party is obstructing and trying to completely end our assistance to Ukraine?
 

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
3,696
2,206
113
The Biden administration, is it?

Do you even know which party is obstructing and trying to completely end our assistance to Ukraine?
YUP. Democraps. Trying to include totally unacceptable and unrelated garbage into the funding bill. Typical lefty ploy to claim someone else is responsible for their incompetence. We see it all the time in BC.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,967
6,093
113
Twin Moose Creek
The Biden administration, is it?

Do you even know which party is obstructing and trying to completely end our assistance to Ukraine?
Not really since there is $4Billion left in the draw down and they allowed $32 Billion in lend lease the GOP voted on to elapse without using it also not donating all the expired weapons and decommissioned equipment to Ukraine, they sold more to scrap yards than they sent to help Ukraine. The GOP are holding up new spending to secure your border!
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,037
8,311
113
Washington DC
Not really since there is $4Billion left in the draw down and they allowed $32 Billion in lend lease the GOP voted on to elapse without using it also not donating all the expired weapons and decommissioned equipment to Ukraine, they sold more to scrap yards than they sent to help Ukraine. The GOP are holding up new spending to secure your border!
Yep, you're right. It's all Biden's fault. Or Trudeau's, your choice.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,345
12,818
113
Low Earth Orbit
Not really since there is $4Billion left in the draw down and they allowed $32 Billion in lend lease the GOP voted on to elapse without using it also not donating all the expired weapons and decommissioned equipment to Ukraine, they sold more to scrap yards than they sent to help Ukraine. The GOP are holding up new spending to secure your border!
Can you blame them? 12,000 a day and its feeding a slave industry.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,967
6,093
113
Twin Moose Creek
Yep, you're right. It's all Biden's fault. Or Trudeau's, your choice.
Did Canada sign the Budapest memorandum in 1994 and demand Ukraine to disarm? Or declare in public "as long as it takes" or "we stand with Ukraine" and fail to provide vital aid timely? Left close to $50 Billion of house authorized aid on the table?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,345
12,818
113
Low Earth Orbit
Did Canada sign the Budapest memorandum in 1994 and demand Ukraine to disarm? Or declare in public "as long as it takes" or "we stand with Ukraine" and fail to provide vital aid timely? Left close to $50 Billion of house authorized aid on the table?
Canada disarmed the ukr nuke aresenal
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twin_Moose

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,596
3,305
113
North Korea appears to be sending its newest missiles to Russia
Author of the article:Bloomberg News
Bloomberg News
Jon Herskovitz
Published Jan 05, 2024 • 3 minute read

The missiles the U.S. has accused North Korea of sending to Russia appear to be from its newest family of nuclear-capable rockets that are easy to hide, quick to deploy and hard to shoot down.


Images provided by the U.S. indicate they are North Korean Hwasong-11s, a wide class of short-range ballistic missile that can reliably hit targets with a high degree of precision, weapons experts say.


Since the missiles are among the newest in Kim Jong Un’s arsenal, he is likely extracting significant compensation from Russian President Vladimir Putin in exchange. They’re priced at about $5 million each, according to data compiled by the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses and released in 2022 by South Korean lawmaker Shin Won-sik.

The transfer of such missiles, with ranges of 400-800 kilometres, increases the pool of weapons the Kremlin can draw upon to attack Ukraine as the war launched by Putin in early 2022 grinds toward a third year. Moscow, meanwhile, is likely providing Kim with weapons, cash and commodities that help prop up his sanctions-hit economy.


Weapons expert Joost Oliemanns said images of missile parts located in Ukraine are a “dead match for the Hwasong-11 family.”

Since 2019, the bulk of North Korea’s ballistic tests have involved two variations on this group, which the outside world has dubbed KN-23 and KN-24. North Korea has fired about 120 of them, mostly from mobile launchers. But it has also also shot them off from train carriages, submerged platforms on lake beds and used them in simulated nuclear attacks in which it detonated a mock nuclear warhead that had conventional explosives.

Although the KN-23 and KN-24 may have been modeled after Russia’s Iskander ballistic missile, many experts see the North Korean rockets as being home-grown, built without reliance on Russia.


“They could have an important impact, if only by offering a different set of capabilities and flight characteristics than the Iskander,” said Oliemanns, who co-authored a book titled The Armed Forces of North Korea.

“We may expect the benefits to be highly profitable for the North Koreans,” he said of the supply of missiles as well as vast amounts of artillery munitions, adding that one thing Kim may receive in return is military aircraft.

The U.S. believes Russia used the North Korean-provided missiles in at least two attacks on Ukraine on Dec. 30 and Jan. 2, White House spokesman John Kirby told reporters Thursday. Russia plans to continue using North Korean ballistic missiles — which can be fired from as far as 550 miles away — in the coming weeks, Kirby said, without detailing how the U.S. obtained the intelligence.


The missile shipments came after the U.S. and South Korea accused North Korea of sending hundreds of thousands of rounds of munitions to Russia that are interoperable with Soviet-era systems Russia has used in its bombardment of Ukraine. Moscow and Pyongyang have denied the charges.

While Biden administration officials plan to raise the latest developments at the United Nations Security Council, there may be little that Washington can do to stop trade in illicit goods between North Korea and Russia.

Satellite imagery of North Korea’s Najin port taken from October to December shows a steady stream of ships at the facility, hundreds of shipping containers being loaded and unloaded, and rail cars ready to transport goods.


The vessels docking there appear to have turned off international maritime transponders that would reveal their location, effectively making them ghost ships as they ply the relatively short route between Najin and Dunay, a former Soviet submarine port about 180 kilometres away.

Three or four vessels have been shuttling between the ports in journeys that appear to keep them in territorial waters of the two countries, according to an analysis by the U.K.-based Royal United Services Institute.

Just how many missiles and mobile launchers North Korea can provide to Russia remains an open question. But ramping up production of both is a top priority for Kim.

Last August, the North Korean leader toured factories making missiles, launchers, armored vehicles and munitions, calling for a drastic increase in production of missiles and what are known as transporter erector launchers (TELs). These mobile systems designed to hold nuclear-capable missiles have been a choke point for North Korea; the more TELs it can roll out, the greater the number of missiles it can fire in a first strike, or retaliatory strike, on South Korea and Japan.

Kim started 2024 with a visit to a TEL factory, calling again for increased production. A key priority is to produce “various TELs for tactical and strategic weapons in ceaselessly bolstering the nuclear war deterrent of the country and the operational demand of our army,” state media reported him as saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,967
6,093
113
Twin Moose Creek
The Brits and Poland are going in soon. A UK General stated he has 30,000 troops ready to go.
I can see that since UK has dried up with their lethal aid short of storm shadows, troop training and AD support they are also a signatory to the 1994 memorandum, Russia has been getting aggressive with Poland
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,345
12,818
113
Low Earth Orbit
I can see that since UK has dried up with their lethal aid short of storm shadows, troop training and AD support they are also a signatory to the 1994 memorandum, Russia has been getting aggressive with Poland
All the storm shadows/scalp, himars, 155 artillery have been past their best before date. Same goes for F16s as F35s push them to pasture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twin_Moose