Omnibus Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell
- Thread starter Tecumsehsbones
- Start date
Who did she victimize and who was the customer.
Sounds like a conspiracy. What New World Order? Is it run by Joos?
Depends whom you ask, & Epstein is the “other” one arrested so…follow the ‘claimed’ bouncing ball I guess…& with only 1/2 the docs released to date, and what had been released redacted to hid the non-victims it’s a ‘dog’s breakfast’ of speculation…& that could very well be all that’s ever going to be revealed.
Bondi wrote that the Department "released all 'records, documents, communications and investigative materials" in their possession that relate to Epstein and eight other different categories. As directed by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, she also included a list of "all government officials and political exposed persons names or referenced in the released materials."
Attorney General Pam Bondi Says All Jeffrey Epstein Files Have Been Released, Includes List Of More than 300 Names Mentioned — Deadline
Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote in a letter to members of Congress that all of the Justice Department files on Jeffrey Epstein have been released in accordance with a law passed last year to disclose the millions of documents related to the the convicted sex offender.
Massie cited a Justice Department letter sent to Congress on Saturday defending its redactions made to the newly released final batch of Epstein documents. Appearing on ABC’s “This Week” show, the GOP congressman noted the DOJ letter, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, cited “deliberative-process privilege” as a reason for withholding certain records.
Lawmakers slam Justice Department’s defense of Epstein files redactions — MS NOW
“The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email,” Rep. Ro Khanna said.
Sure. Why not? “To have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for the sexual abuse of hundreds of young women and child pornography, with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files is absurd.” (The Justice Department announced in December that a letter released in a tranche of Epstein files purportedly from Epstein to Nassar, the convicted Olympic gymnastics coach, was a fake
“The privileges that applied to the withheld records were deliberative-process privilege, work-product privilege, and attorney-client privilege.,” the Feb. 14 DOJ letter said. The letter listed the names of more than 300 people, many of whom had no direct dealings with Epstein and have long been dead, including Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley and Ronald Reagan.
Other names include President Donald Trump, former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, Treasury Secretary Howard Lutnick — who was grilled before Congress last week over his association with Epstein — Jeff Bezos and Peter Thiel. None of the people listed have been accused of criminal wrongdoing with regard to Epstein’s actions.
Massie objected to the DOJ’s claim of privilege in withholding certain Epstein documents because, he said, the Justice Department “must release internal memos and notes and emails” related to investigative and prosecutorial decisions regarding the Epstein matter.
“It’s important they follow that because then we could find out why they didn’t prosecute Leslie Wexner,” he told ABC’s Martha Raddatz. A legal representative for Wexner said in a statement that the assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the Epstein investigation “stated at the time that Mr. Wexner was neither a co-conspirator nor target in any respect” and that “Mr. Wexner cooperated fully by providing background information on Epstein and was never contacted again.”
Massie accused the Justice Department of taking down documents before members of Congress were able to review them in their unredacted forms. “We want to be able to look at all these files,” he said. Lawmakers have also been subject to apparent surveillance while reviewing Epstein documents in a private room at the Justice Department.Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, echoed calls for answers about who was involved in the trafficking of girls and women besides convicted Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.
The Justice Department, in its letter to the Republican chairmen and ranking Democrats of House and Senate Judiciary Committees, said no records were withheld or redacted “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”
The DOJ said the lengthy list of high-profile names included in its letter includes “all government officials and politically exposed persons.” But the letter does not differentiate between people mentioned in news stories who likely had little or no connection to Epstein and those who were shown to have communicated with Epstein, Maxwell and other associates.
Massie, who is facing a primary opponent endorsed by Trump, said the president is “still with the Epstein class. This is the Epstein administration and they’re attacking me for trying to get these files released.”
Lawmakers slam Justice Department’s defense of Epstein files redactions — MS NOW
“The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email,” Rep. Ro Khanna said.
Worst cover-up ever!Depends whom you ask, & Epstein is the “other” one arrested so…follow the ‘claimed’ bouncing ball I guess…& with only 1/2 the docs released to date, and what had been released redacted to hid the non-victims it’s a ‘dog’s breakfast’ of speculation…& that could very well be all that’s ever going to be revealed.
Bondi wrote that the Department "released all 'records, documents, communications and investigative materials" in their possession that relate to Epstein and eight other different categories. As directed by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, she also included a list of "all government officials and political exposed persons names or referenced in the released materials."
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., co-author of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, on Sunday slammed what he called Donald Trump’s “Epstein administration” for not fulfilling its legal obligation to release all government documents related to the late convicted sex offender.
Attorney General Pam Bondi Says All Jeffrey Epstein Files Have Been Released, Includes List Of More than 300 Names Mentioned — Deadline
Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote in a letter to members of Congress that all of the Justice Department files on Jeffrey Epstein have been released in accordance with a law passed last year to disclose the millions of documents related to the the convicted sex offender.apple.news
Massie cited a Justice Department letter sent to Congress on Saturday defending its redactions made to the newly released final batch of Epstein documents. Appearing on ABC’s “This Week” show, the GOP congressman noted the DOJ letter, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, cited “deliberative-process privilege” as a reason for withholding certain records.
Rep. Ro Khanna, the California Democrat who co-authored the Epstein bill, also criticized the DOJ letter regarding its redactions. “The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email,” Khanna said on X.
Lawmakers slam Justice Department’s defense of Epstein files redactions — MS NOW
“The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email,” Rep. Ro Khanna said.
Sure. Why not? “To have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for the sexual abuse of hundreds of young women and child pornography, with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files is absurd.” (The Justice Department announced in December that a letter released in a tranche of Epstein files purportedly from Epstein to Nassar, the convicted Olympic gymnastics coach, was a fake
“The privileges that applied to the withheld records were deliberative-process privilege, work-product privilege, and attorney-client privilege.,” the Feb. 14 DOJ letter said. The letter listed the names of more than 300 people, many of whom had no direct dealings with Epstein and have long been dead, including Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley and Ronald Reagan.
Other names include President Donald Trump, former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, Treasury Secretary Howard Lutnick — who was grilled before Congress last week over his association with Epstein — Jeff Bezos and Peter Thiel. None of the people listed have been accused of criminal wrongdoing with regard to Epstein’s actions.
Massie objected to the DOJ’s claim of privilege in withholding certain Epstein documents because, he said, the Justice Department “must release internal memos and notes and emails” related to investigative and prosecutorial decisions regarding the Epstein matter.
“It’s important they follow that because then we could find out why they didn’t prosecute Leslie Wexner,” he told ABC’s Martha Raddatz. A legal representative for Wexner said in a statement that the assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the Epstein investigation “stated at the time that Mr. Wexner was neither a co-conspirator nor target in any respect” and that “Mr. Wexner cooperated fully by providing background information on Epstein and was never contacted again.”
View attachment 33259Massie accused the Justice Department of taking down documents before members of Congress were able to review them in their unredacted forms. “We want to be able to look at all these files,” he said. Lawmakers have also been subject to apparent surveillance while reviewing Epstein documents in a private room at the Justice Department.
Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, echoed calls for answers about who was involved in the trafficking of girls and women besides convicted Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.
The Justice Department, in its letter to the Republican chairmen and ranking Democrats of House and Senate Judiciary Committees, said no records were withheld or redacted “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”
The DOJ said the lengthy list of high-profile names included in its letter includes “all government officials and politically exposed persons.” But the letter does not differentiate between people mentioned in news stories who likely had little or no connection to Epstein and those who were shown to have communicated with Epstein, Maxwell and other associates.
Massie, who is facing a primary opponent endorsed by Trump, said the president is “still with the Epstein class. This is the Epstein administration and they’re attacking me for trying to get these files released.”
Lawmakers slam Justice Department’s defense of Epstein files redactions — MS NOW
“The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email,” Rep. Ro Khanna said.
IS THIS GHISLAINE MAXWELL???
Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.
youtube.com
IS THIS GHISLAINE MAXWELL???
Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.
Trippy. Food for thought…
Well, this is interesting…
www.youtube.com
(YouTube & Massie: “My Staff Was Threatened with FBI Fraud Probe”)
Leading from this days ago:
(YouTube & Massie threatens to release names found in Epstein files)
www.youtube.com
(YouTube & Massie says Epstein files withheld over Israeli and US intelligence ties)
Massie co-authored the Epstein Files Transparency Act alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna last July. When the act was passed into law, the Trump Administration was forced to releasemillions of documents collected in connection to the Epstein case. Still, the Justice Department has been under intense scrutiny after releasing only half of the 6 million documents and failing to redactEpstein’s survivors’ information.
Massie, 55, has been on the receiving end of MAGA’s ire since last June after Trump’s political machine launched a $1 million campaign against him. He said those trying to oust him from his seat are weaponizing their wealth and influence against him because of his push for the Epstein files.
Massie: “My Staff Was Threatened with FBI Fraud Probe” #thomasmassie #donaldtrump #kashpatel
Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.
www.youtube.com
Leading from this days ago:
Massie says Epstein files withheld over Israeli and US intelligence ties
The Epstein files are being withheld because Jeffrey Epstein had close ties to Israeli intelligence and US intelligence, according to Congressman Thomas Mass...
www.youtube.com
Massie co-authored the Epstein Files Transparency Act alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna last July. When the act was passed into law, the Trump Administration was forced to releasemillions of documents collected in connection to the Epstein case. Still, the Justice Department has been under intense scrutiny after releasing only half of the 6 million documents and failing to redactEpstein’s survivors’ information.
Massie, 55, has been on the receiving end of MAGA’s ire since last June after Trump’s political machine launched a $1 million campaign against him. He said those trying to oust him from his seat are weaponizing their wealth and influence against him because of his push for the Epstein files.
Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Sunday warned Republicans that right-wing influencers trying to downplay the Jeffrey Epstein files are going to cost the party in November.
“All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women look like cult fools,” she wrote on X. “Good luck trying to get women to vote for Republicans in the midterms you insensitive clowns.”
Trump was once close friends with Epstein, a sex offender who died in jail in an apparent suicide in 2019. In 2024, Trump and those around him promised to release files related to the case if he won the election.
After Trump won, his administration held a White House event to give a group of MAGA influencers large binders of supposed files ― but it quickly became clear that most of those documents had already been released.
Trump and his administration then spent much of the rest of the year trying to stonewall the release of additional files. Attorney General Pam Bondi, who at one point claimed she had a supposed list of Epstein clients on her desk ready to be released…
…later said there was no such list and no further documents to release.
Greene ― who had been a staunch Trump supporter and MAGA believer who frequently appeared with him at campaign events ― joined a small group of Republican lawmakers to push for the full release of the Epstein files. Trump was reportedly not happy. The move led to a break between the two, with Trump publicly attacking her as a “traitor.” (???)
apple.news
(Traitor to whom or what?)
“All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women look like cult fools,” she wrote on X. “Good luck trying to get women to vote for Republicans in the midterms you insensitive clowns.”
Trump was once close friends with Epstein, a sex offender who died in jail in an apparent suicide in 2019. In 2024, Trump and those around him promised to release files related to the case if he won the election.
After Trump won, his administration held a White House event to give a group of MAGA influencers large binders of supposed files ― but it quickly became clear that most of those documents had already been released.
Trump and his administration then spent much of the rest of the year trying to stonewall the release of additional files. Attorney General Pam Bondi, who at one point claimed she had a supposed list of Epstein clients on her desk ready to be released……later said there was no such list and no further documents to release.Greene ― who had been a staunch Trump supporter and MAGA believer who frequently appeared with him at campaign events ― joined a small group of Republican lawmakers to push for the full release of the Epstein files. Trump was reportedly not happy. The move led to a break between the two, with Trump publicly attacking her as a “traitor.” (???)
Marjorie Taylor Greene Rips MAGA 'Clowns,' Hits Republicans With New Midterm Warning — HuffPost
The former GOP congresswoman said one of the party's biggest problems isn't getting any better.
So all of a sudden M T Greene is credible . Hmmmn .Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Sunday warned Republicans that right-wing influencers trying to downplay the Jeffrey Epstein files are going to cost the party in November.
View attachment 33286
“All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women look like cult fools,” she wrote on X. “Good luck trying to get women to vote for Republicans in the midterms you insensitive clowns.”
View attachment 33283
Trump was once close friends with Epstein, a sex offender who died in jail in an apparent suicide in 2019. In 2024, Trump and those around him promised to release files related to the case if he won the election.
View attachment 33284
After Trump won, his administration held a White House event to give a group of MAGA influencers large binders of supposed files ― but it quickly became clear that most of those documents had already been released.
View attachment 33285…later said there was no such list and no further documents to release.
View attachment 33287
Greene ― who had been a staunch Trump supporter and MAGA believer who frequently appeared with him at campaign events ― joined a small group of Republican lawmakers to push for the full release of the Epstein files. Trump was reportedly not happy. The move led to a break between the two, with Trump publicly attacking her as a “traitor.” (???)
(Traitor to whom or what?)Marjorie Taylor Greene Rips MAGA 'Clowns,' Hits Republicans With New Midterm Warning — HuffPost
The former GOP congresswoman said one of the party's biggest problems isn't getting any better.
So you didn’t like her before thus anything she says now has to be suspect or false?
Bondi's February 14 letter was sent to Congress as required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. She was ordered to inform and update Congress within 15 days of completing the release of all the files.
The Daily Mail reported that the outrage allegedly stems from the list not providing context, as various celebrities and politicians appear on Bondi’s roundup of the rich and famous. Bondi's list even includes the names of celebrities who were long dead before Epstein began his operation.
Names such as Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, allegedly appeared on the newly-released list. Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna accused the Trump DOJ of “muddying the waters” by lumping together the names of alleged predators and those who were “mentioned in an email.”
Bondi Blasted After Adding Elvis and Marilyn Monroe to Epstein List — The New Republic
Attorney General Pam Bondi added just about every name to the email list.
Former Trump ally and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene also chimed in after her name was released in Bondi’s letter. While in Congress, Greene pushed for the release of the Epstein files, much to the detriment of her relationship with Trump.
Greene also took to X to write a scathing statement questioning Bondi’s hypocrisy of placing her name on a list as part of her “DOJ letter,” yet redacting “all 31 pages of this file with my name in it.” Under the law, the only elements of the files allowed to be redacted are those protecting victims' identities, active investigation details, and child sexual abuse material. According to the FBI, there are approximately 1,000 Epstein victims.
The Epstein Files Transparency Act, which the Department of Justice is now implementing after Trump signed it into law on November 19, 2025, requires the public release of all unclassified records relating to Epstein and his convicted associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. Hundreds of lawyers combed through roughly 6 million pages worth of files, according to the DOJ, releasing over 3.5 million pages of materials weeks after the deadline…so about 1/2 of the files in their possession.
Outrage over Epstein list as it includes celebrities who died when pedophile was a child — The Mirror
Republicans and Democrats alike are fuming at AG Bondi's letter that included the names of 305 rich and famous people named in the Epstein files, as they believe the names were released without context
Epstein Files Transparency Act - Wikipedia
HHHMMMM
The yacht hosted high-profile guests, anchored near major events, and appeared in media coverage that reinforced Trump’s image as a billionaire power broker. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the yacht symbolized a specific kind of American wealth, loud, visible, and unapologetic.
What Made Trump Princess So Notorious
Trump Princess didn’t just exist to cruise quietly.The yacht hosted high-profile guests, anchored near major events, and appeared in media coverage that reinforced Trump’s image as a billionaire power broker. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the yacht symbolized a specific kind of American wealth, loud, visible, and unapologetic.
President Donald Trump’s critics aren’t buying his latest claim about the files related to his former friend, the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“I have nothing to hide. I’ve been exonerated. I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday evening. “They went in hoping that they’d find it and found just the opposite. I’ve been totally exonerated.”
He used the phrase “totally exonerated” at least two more times during the exchange.
Exonerated by who (or is that whom?)? Himself?
The half of the files released do not offer new evidence of wrongdoing by Trump. However, Trump ― who was once close to Epstein ― is mentioned frequently, and the documents are so heavily redacted that critics say many questions remain.
apple.news
Donald Trump’s White House is scaling up a campaign of intimidation, obfuscation and distraction in its desperate attempt to quash demands to release more of the Jeffrey Epstein files.
US Attorney General, Pam Bondi, claimed in a letter to members of Congress on Saturday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) had released all of the documents required to be shared under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
However, the department previously said it identified over six million potential files. So far, it has published less than four million, many of which were redacted.
On 30 January, the DOJ released three million pages of documents relating to Epstein, with deputy Attorney General, Todd Blanche, saying this marked “the end” of the review process. However, victims and lawmakers have accused the DOJ of keeping back millions of documents for no reason other than to protect the names and reputations of those who may have been involved with Epstein.
“Conveniently (coincidentally?), all the documents released are ones after there was a rupture between Epstein and Trump,” he said. “What we don’t have are the 10 years before that when they were buddies; all that data exists given Epstein’s meticulous records, so the framing in which the DOJ has done this has deliberately been partial and constructed in a way which doesn’t allow scrutiny of Trump.”
At the weekend the DOJ also sent an extensive list of high-profile people referenced in the files – even if they had no interactions with Epstein – to the leaders of the Senate and House judiciary committees, with no context.
apple.news
Lawmakers remain frustrated with the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files, after Attorney General Pam Bondi notified Congress that no more materials would be released as the Trump administration attempts to move on from the issue? Seriously?
apple.news
“I have nothing to hide. I’ve been exonerated. I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday evening. “They went in hoping that they’d find it and found just the opposite. I’ve been totally exonerated.”
He used the phrase “totally exonerated” at least two more times during the exchange.
Exonerated by who (or is that whom?)? Himself?
The half of the files released do not offer new evidence of wrongdoing by Trump. However, Trump ― who was once close to Epstein ― is mentioned frequently, and the documents are so heavily redacted that critics say many questions remain.Trump's Latest Epstein Denial Has Critics Asking New Questions — HuffPost
The president insisted he was "totally exonerated" by the latest Epstein files release, but not everyone is buying it.
US Attorney General, Pam Bondi, claimed in a letter to members of Congress on Saturday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) had released all of the documents required to be shared under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
However, the department previously said it identified over six million potential files. So far, it has published less than four million, many of which were redacted.
On 30 January, the DOJ released three million pages of documents relating to Epstein, with deputy Attorney General, Todd Blanche, saying this marked “the end” of the review process. However, victims and lawmakers have accused the DOJ of keeping back millions of documents for no reason other than to protect the names and reputations of those who may have been involved with Epstein.
“Conveniently (coincidentally?), all the documents released are ones after there was a rupture between Epstein and Trump,” he said. “What we don’t have are the 10 years before that when they were buddies; all that data exists given Epstein’s meticulous records, so the framing in which the DOJ has done this has deliberately been partial and constructed in a way which doesn’t allow scrutiny of Trump.”
At the weekend the DOJ also sent an extensive list of high-profile people referenced in the files – even if they had no interactions with Epstein – to the leaders of the Senate and House judiciary committees, with no context.
Trump's menacing operation to bury the Epstein files for ever — The i Paper
US lawmakers have accused the Department of Justice of an 'outrageous abuse of power' after it tracked which unredacted Epstein files they were viewing
Lawmakers frustrated after Bondi ends Epstein review — MS NOW
Lawmakers remain frustrated with the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files, after Attorney General Pam Bondi notified Congress that no more materials would be released as the Trump administration attempts to move on from the issue. Symone Sanders Townsend is joined by Mychael...
Hard to think if there was such a person inappropriately involved with Trump they would not have come forward with a direct accusation. Could be the bodies were dumped but that seems a bit much.
What exactly are you hoping these files will show ? Do you think they have photos of Trump having kiddy sex ? Shit these files even mention Janis Joplin who was already dead . I wonder what that was in reference too , JFK ?President Donald Trump’s critics aren’t buying his latest claim about the files related to his former friend, the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“I have nothing to hide. I’ve been exonerated. I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday evening. “They went in hoping that they’d find it and found just the opposite. I’ve been totally exonerated.”
He used the phrase “totally exonerated” at least two more times during the exchange.
Exonerated by who (or is that whom?)? Himself?
View attachment 33299
View attachment 33300The half of the files released do not offer new evidence of wrongdoing by Trump. However, Trump ― who was once close to Epstein ― is mentioned frequently, and the documents are so heavily redacted that critics say many questions remain.
Donald Trump’s White House is scaling up a campaign of intimidation, obfuscation and distraction in its desperate attempt to quash demands to release more of the Jeffrey Epstein files.Trump's Latest Epstein Denial Has Critics Asking New Questions — HuffPost
The president insisted he was "totally exonerated" by the latest Epstein files release, but not everyone is buying it.
US Attorney General, Pam Bondi, claimed in a letter to members of Congress on Saturday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) had released all of the documents required to be shared under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
However, the department previously said it identified over six million potential files. So far, it has published less than four million, many of which were redacted.
On 30 January, the DOJ released three million pages of documents relating to Epstein, with deputy Attorney General, Todd Blanche, saying this marked “the end” of the review process. However, victims and lawmakers have accused the DOJ of keeping back millions of documents for no reason other than to protect the names and reputations of those who may have been involved with Epstein.
“Conveniently (coincidentally?), all the documents released are ones after there was a rupture between Epstein and Trump,” he said. “What we don’t have are the 10 years before that when they were buddies; all that data exists given Epstein’s meticulous records, so the framing in which the DOJ has done this has deliberately been partial and constructed in a way which doesn’t allow scrutiny of Trump.”
At the weekend the DOJ also sent an extensive list of high-profile people referenced in the files – even if they had no interactions with Epstein – to the leaders of the Senate and House judiciary committees, with no context.
Lawmakers remain frustrated with the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files, after Attorney General Pam Bondi notified Congress that no more materials would be released as the Trump administration attempts to move on from the issue? Seriously?Trump's menacing operation to bury the Epstein files for ever — The i Paper
US lawmakers have accused the Department of Justice of an 'outrageous abuse of power' after it tracked which unredacted Epstein files they were viewing
Lawmakers frustrated after Bondi ends Epstein review — MS NOW
Lawmakers remain frustrated with the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files, after Attorney General Pam Bondi notified Congress that no more materials would be released as the Trump administration attempts to move on from the issue. Symone Sanders Townsend is joined by Mychael...
I would like to see everybody connected with this swing from a rope in all honesty. My fixation isn’t Trump… but everybody on both side sides of the aisle and those non-political that were involved with this paedophile also.
The fact that the DOJ is mentioning Janis Joplin and Elvis, and so on and so forth is just evidence of their bullshit and trying to bury things. It’s bad.
No it just shows that those names were mentioned with no context , how many others are there .