Omnibus Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,302
11,368
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
How many arrests?
Counting, or not counting, Maxwell?
Who did she victimize and who was the customer.
Depends whom you ask, & Epstein is the “other” one arrested so…follow the ‘claimed’ bouncing ball I guess…& with only 1/2 the docs released to date, and what had been released redacted to hid the non-victims it’s a ‘dog’s breakfast’ of speculation…& that could very well be all that’s ever going to be revealed.
Bondi wrote that the Department "released all 'records, documents, communications and investigative materials" in their possession that relate to Epstein and eight other different categories. As directed by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, she also included a list of "all government officials and political exposed persons names or referenced in the released materials."
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., co-author of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, on Sunday slammed what he called Donald Trump’s “Epstein administration” for not fulfilling its legal obligation to release all government documents related to the late convicted sex offender.

Massie cited a Justice Department letter sent to Congress on Saturday defending its redactions made to the newly released final batch of Epstein documents. Appearing on ABC’s “This Week” show, the GOP congressman noted the DOJ letter, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, cited “deliberative-process privilege” as a reason for withholding certain records.
Rep. Ro Khanna, the California Democrat who co-authored the Epstein bill, also criticized the DOJ letter regarding its redactions. “The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email,” Khanna said on X.
Sounds like a conspiracy. What New World Order? Is it run by Joos?
Sure. Why not? “To have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for the sexual abuse of hundreds of young women and child pornography, with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files is absurd.” (The Justice Department announced in December that a letter released in a tranche of Epstein files purportedly from Epstein to Nassar, the convicted Olympic gymnastics coach, was a fake

“The privileges that applied to the withheld records were deliberative-process privilege, work-product privilege, and attorney-client privilege.,” the Feb. 14 DOJ letter said. The letter listed the names of more than 300 people, many of whom had no direct dealings with Epstein and have long been dead, including Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley and Ronald Reagan.

Other names include President Donald Trump, former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, Treasury Secretary Howard Lutnick — who was grilled before Congress last week over his association with Epstein — Jeff Bezos and Peter Thiel. None of the people listed have been accused of criminal wrongdoing with regard to Epstein’s actions.

Massie objected to the DOJ’s claim of privilege in withholding certain Epstein documents because, he said, the Justice Department “must release internal memos and notes and emails” related to investigative and prosecutorial decisions regarding the Epstein matter.

“It’s important they follow that because then we could find out why they didn’t prosecute Leslie Wexner,” he told ABC’s Martha Raddatz. A legal representative for Wexner said in a statement that the assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the Epstein investigation “stated at the time that Mr. Wexner was neither a co-conspirator nor target in any respect” and that “Mr. Wexner cooperated fully by providing background information on Epstein and was never contacted again.”
1771186042077.jpegMassie accused the Justice Department of taking down documents before members of Congress were able to review them in their unredacted forms. “We want to be able to look at all these files,” he said. Lawmakers have also been subject to apparent surveillance while reviewing Epstein documents in a private room at the Justice Department.

Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, echoed calls for answers about who was involved in the trafficking of girls and women besides convicted Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.

The Justice Department, in its letter to the Republican chairmen and ranking Democrats of House and Senate Judiciary Committees, said no records were withheld or redacted “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”🤞😉

The DOJ said the lengthy list of high-profile names included in its letter includes “all government officials and politically exposed persons.” But the letter does not differentiate between people mentioned in news stories who likely had little or no connection to Epstein and those who were shown to have communicated with Epstein, Maxwell and other associates.

Massie, who is facing a primary opponent endorsed by Trump, said the president is “still with the Epstein class. This is the Epstein administration and they’re attacking me for trying to get these files released.”
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,647
14,741
113
Low Earth Orbit
Depends whom you ask, & Epstein is the “other” one arrested so…follow the ‘claimed’ bouncing ball I guess…& with only 1/2 the docs released to date, and what had been released redacted to hid the non-victims it’s a ‘dog’s breakfast’ of speculation…& that could very well be all that’s ever going to be revealed.

Bondi wrote that the Department "released all 'records, documents, communications and investigative materials" in their possession that relate to Epstein and eight other different categories. As directed by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, she also included a list of "all government officials and political exposed persons names or referenced in the released materials."
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., co-author of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, on Sunday slammed what he called Donald Trump’s “Epstein administration” for not fulfilling its legal obligation to release all government documents related to the late convicted sex offender.

Massie cited a Justice Department letter sent to Congress on Saturday defending its redactions made to the newly released final batch of Epstein documents. Appearing on ABC’s “This Week” show, the GOP congressman noted the DOJ letter, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, cited “deliberative-process privilege” as a reason for withholding certain records.
Rep. Ro Khanna, the California Democrat who co-authored the Epstein bill, also criticized the DOJ letter regarding its redactions. “The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email,” Khanna said on X.

Sure. Why not? “To have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for the sexual abuse of hundreds of young women and child pornography, with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files is absurd.” (The Justice Department announced in December that a letter released in a tranche of Epstein files purportedly from Epstein to Nassar, the convicted Olympic gymnastics coach, was a fake

“The privileges that applied to the withheld records were deliberative-process privilege, work-product privilege, and attorney-client privilege.,” the Feb. 14 DOJ letter said. The letter listed the names of more than 300 people, many of whom had no direct dealings with Epstein and have long been dead, including Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley and Ronald Reagan.

Other names include President Donald Trump, former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, Treasury Secretary Howard Lutnick — who was grilled before Congress last week over his association with Epstein — Jeff Bezos and Peter Thiel. None of the people listed have been accused of criminal wrongdoing with regard to Epstein’s actions.

Massie objected to the DOJ’s claim of privilege in withholding certain Epstein documents because, he said, the Justice Department “must release internal memos and notes and emails” related to investigative and prosecutorial decisions regarding the Epstein matter.

“It’s important they follow that because then we could find out why they didn’t prosecute Leslie Wexner,” he told ABC’s Martha Raddatz. A legal representative for Wexner said in a statement that the assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the Epstein investigation “stated at the time that Mr. Wexner was neither a co-conspirator nor target in any respect” and that “Mr. Wexner cooperated fully by providing background information on Epstein and was never contacted again.”
View attachment 33259Massie accused the Justice Department of taking down documents before members of Congress were able to review them in their unredacted forms. “We want to be able to look at all these files,” he said. Lawmakers have also been subject to apparent surveillance while reviewing Epstein documents in a private room at the Justice Department.

Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, echoed calls for answers about who was involved in the trafficking of girls and women besides convicted Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.

The Justice Department, in its letter to the Republican chairmen and ranking Democrats of House and Senate Judiciary Committees, said no records were withheld or redacted “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”🤞😉

The DOJ said the lengthy list of high-profile names included in its letter includes “all government officials and politically exposed persons.” But the letter does not differentiate between people mentioned in news stories who likely had little or no connection to Epstein and those who were shown to have communicated with Epstein, Maxwell and other associates.

Massie, who is facing a primary opponent endorsed by Trump, said the president is “still with the Epstein class. This is the Epstein administration and they’re attacking me for trying to get these files released.”
Worst cover-up ever!
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,302
11,368
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Well, this is interesting…
(YouTube & Massie: “My Staff Was Threatened with FBI Fraud Probe”)
1771205991143.jpeg
1771206009467.jpeg
1771206444658.jpeg
Leading from this days ago:
(YouTube & Massie threatens to release names found in Epstein files)
(YouTube & Massie says Epstein files withheld over Israeli and US intelligence ties)

Massie co-authored the Epstein Files Transparency Act alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna last July. When the act was passed into law, the Trump Administration was forced to releasemillions of documents collected in connection to the Epstein case. Still, the Justice Department has been under intense scrutiny after releasing only half of the 6 million documents and failing to redactEpstein’s survivors’ information.

Massie, 55, has been on the receiving end of MAGA’s ire since last June after Trump’s political machine launched a $1 million campaign against him. He said those trying to oust him from his seat are weaponizing their wealth and influence against him because of his push for the Epstein files.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,302
11,368
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Sunday warned Republicans that right-wing influencers trying to downplay the Jeffrey Epstein files are going to cost the party in November.
1771254915800.jpeg
“All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women look like cult fools,” she wrote on X. “Good luck trying to get women to vote for Republicans in the midterms you insensitive clowns.”
1771254332318.jpeg
Trump was once close friends with Epstein, a sex offender who died in jail in an apparent suicide in 2019. In 2024, Trump and those around him promised to release files related to the case if he won the election.
1771254613741.jpeg
After Trump won, his administration held a White House event to give a group of MAGA influencers large binders of supposed files ― but it quickly became clear that most of those documents had already been released.🙄 Trump and his administration then spent much of the rest of the year trying to stonewall the release of additional files. Attorney General Pam Bondi, who at one point claimed she had a supposed list of Epstein clients on her desk ready to be released…
1771254781277.jpeg…later said there was no such list and no further documents to release.
1771254991591.jpeg
Greene ― who had been a staunch Trump supporter and MAGA believer who frequently appeared with him at campaign events ― joined a small group of Republican lawmakers to push for the full release of the Epstein files. Trump was reportedly not happy. The move led to a break between the two, with Trump publicly attacking her as a “traitor.” (???)
(Traitor to whom or what?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,922
8,337
113
B.C.
Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Sunday warned Republicans that right-wing influencers trying to downplay the Jeffrey Epstein files are going to cost the party in November.
View attachment 33286
“All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women look like cult fools,” she wrote on X. “Good luck trying to get women to vote for Republicans in the midterms you insensitive clowns.”
View attachment 33283
Trump was once close friends with Epstein, a sex offender who died in jail in an apparent suicide in 2019. In 2024, Trump and those around him promised to release files related to the case if he won the election.
View attachment 33284
After Trump won, his administration held a White House event to give a group of MAGA influencers large binders of supposed files ― but it quickly became clear that most of those documents had already been released.🙄 Trump and his administration then spent much of the rest of the year trying to stonewall the release of additional files. Attorney General Pam Bondi, who at one point claimed she had a supposed list of Epstein clients on her desk ready to be released…
View attachment 33285…later said there was no such list and no further documents to release.
View attachment 33287
Greene ― who had been a staunch Trump supporter and MAGA believer who frequently appeared with him at campaign events ― joined a small group of Republican lawmakers to push for the full release of the Epstein files. Trump was reportedly not happy. The move led to a break between the two, with Trump publicly attacking her as a “traitor.” (???)
(Traitor to whom or what?)
So all of a sudden M T Greene is credible . Hmmmn .
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,302
11,368
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
So all of a sudden M T Greene is credible . Hmmmn .
So you didn’t like her before thus anything she says now has to be suspect or false?

Bondi's February 14 letter was sent to Congress as required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. She was ordered to inform and update Congress within 15 days of completing the release of all the files.

The Daily Mail reported that the outrage allegedly stems from the list not providing context, as various celebrities and politicians appear on Bondi’s roundup of the rich and famous. Bondi's list even includes the names of celebrities who were long dead before Epstein began his operation.

Names such as Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, allegedly appeared on the newly-released list. Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna accused the Trump DOJ of “muddying the waters” by lumping together the names of alleged predators and those who were “mentioned in an email.”
“The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email," Khanna wrote on X. "To have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for the sexual abuse of hundreds of young women and child pornography, with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files, is absurd. Release the full files. Stop protecting predators. Redact only the survivors' names."
(YouTube & Pam Bondi makes INSANE Epstein announcement)

Former Trump ally and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene also chimed in after her name was released in Bondi’s letter. While in Congress, Greene pushed for the release of the Epstein files, much to the detriment of her relationship with Trump.
1771281372090.jpeg
Greene also took to X to write a scathing statement questioning Bondi’s hypocrisy of placing her name on a list as part of her “DOJ letter,” yet redacting “all 31 pages of this file with my name in it.” Under the law, the only elements of the files allowed to be redacted are those protecting victims' identities, active investigation details, and child sexual abuse material. According to the FBI, there are approximately 1,000 Epstein victims.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act, which the Department of Justice is now implementing after Trump signed it into law on November 19, 2025, requires the public release of all unclassified records relating to Epstein and his convicted associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. Hundreds of lawyers combed through roughly 6 million pages worth of files, according to the DOJ, releasing over 3.5 million pages of materials weeks after the deadline…so about 1/2 of the files in their possession.
Arguably the most egregious part of the letter, however, is the assertion from Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche that the DOJ had fulfilled its legal requirements and considers the legal matters of Epstein and his associates and accomplices settled. Khanna called out Bondi’s antics on X.
The DOJ has yet to release all six million files relating to Epstein, and this list of names looks like an attempt to placate critics. But the end result is the opposite, with Bondi exposed for avoiding the information that would be damaging to Trump and his friends. It’s obvious that the Trump administration is trying in vain to pacify the public about Epstein but is failing blatantly.
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
2,026
1,367
113
HHHMMMM

What Made Trump Princess So Notorious​

Trump Princess didn’t just exist to cruise quietly.

The yacht hosted high-profile guests, anchored near major events, and appeared in media coverage that reinforced Trump’s image as a billionaire power broker. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the yacht symbolized a specific kind of American wealth, loud, visible, and unapologetic.