Omnibus Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell

Taxslave2

Senate Member
Aug 13, 2022
5,010
2,828
113
He was a big-time player in New York when Epstein was active. He's also, then and now, a women-are-property kind of sexist asshole. Those sorts like to buy women for the thrill of ownership, not because they can't get them voluntarily.

OF COURSE he's on the list!
I see Trump as the type that would brag about being on the list. Maybe he isn’t on it, and is embarrassed to be the only politician in recent memory NOT to be on the list?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,183
14,241
113
Low Earth Orbit
(YouTube & Trump's Epstein Files Saga)

Maybe the list of names crosses political boundaries?
View attachment 30063
U.S. President Donald Trump sued the Wall Street Journal and its owners including Rupert Murdoch for at least $10 billion on Friday, over the newspaper's report that his name was on a 2003 birthday greeting for Jeffrey Epstein that included a sexually suggestive drawing and a reference to secrets they shared.
The lawsuit filed in Miami federal court names Murdoch, Dow Jones, News Corp (NWSA.O) and its Chief Executive Robert Thomson, and two Wall Street Journal reporters as defendants, saying they defamed Trump and caused him to suffer "overwhelming" financial and reputational harm, etc…
Oh my fucking God. That's fucking pure genius.

My pizza law is a 2 topping 8" with extra cheese at best but Criminal courts couldn't prove OJ guilty but boy howdy the civil courts did and fucked him harder than a cell block full of "sisters" ever could.

Murdoch and Thomas have "The List" and by golly they are on it.

It's reverse blackmail.

In order prove what they say is true they have to expose themselves or pay $10B and exonerate Trump.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,979
10,947
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
In order prove what they say is true they have to expose themselves or pay $10B and exonerate Trump.
Or let Trump proceed and the “list” and “birthday card” or whatever become potentially “non-disappearing” evidence in court? Could that happen? Maybe an opportunity to cross examine Trump (a current, again, sitting President) in court under oath?
1752952000607.jpeg
It may look like I’m following this closely, but I’m mostly here for the memes and dark humour around this shitshow.1752951850768.jpeg1752953364641.jpeg
(YouTube & Don't Let Her Testify! News Update)