O, bomber! Obama bombs 7th country in 6 years

[JLM]

Obama should have been doing more bombing and using more drone to route out all
the Muslim Extremists they could find. The right one day is saying he's not doing enough
when he does something it offends them Too bloody bad. While some play games or
look the other way we are setting ourselves up for serious problems over seas and at
home. We are at war with crazy people and its time to face up to that fact.

You're talking perfect sense, Grumpy! When someone picks a fight with someone, they should be prepared for whatever action the opponent takes.

 

[darkbeaver]

Obamas UN address was chilling psycobabble . He's pure conditioned drug lizard, bactank monster.

 

[CDNBear]

Obamas UN address was chilling psycobabble .

You two have the same writers?

 

[darkbeaver]

You're talking perfect sense, Grumpy! When someone picks a fight with someone, they should be prepared for whatever action the opponent takes.

When someone picks a fight with themselves what should we do?

You two have the same writers?

Yeah and it's plain you don't have a writer.

That was just a little "nudge", if any one of us put our minds to it we could cause a catastrophe a hundred times worse than that one. This town has a hill on a 10% down grade leading into on the main highway which is generally bumper to bumper traffic a high percentage of which is semi trailers, some hauling gasoline and propane. It wouldn't take a lot for someone to throw an object out in front of one of those rigs, and bingo you have "Lac Megantic"!

Lac Megantic was corporate terrorist crime JLM, it's cheaper to burn down a town than it is to crew maintain properly, that town was a warning, what's been done to avenge the victims deaths, has safety and maintenance improved? You are soft on corporate suit and tie sporting terrorists. It's you and your elk we have to watch out for, never mind getting tough with them Muslim bad guys thousands of miles away, what have you done to protect us today? Are our towns safe from dangerous terroristic rail frieght?

 

[gopher]

Gopher is just in his own world. He has his liberal blinders on again.

horseshtt

Just in case you forgot I was the first one here to say that what went on in Syria and what goes on with ISIS is none of our fúcking business.

 

[darkbeaver]

horseshtt

Just in case you forgot I was the first one here to say that what went on in Syria and what goes on with ISIS is none of our fúcking business.

So you're saying it's time Uncle Sham pays off the lot of them and suspends their vocational training allowances and sabaticals.

You know I've been looking at Uncle Scams war record and I'm wondering if more than a few other countries aren't coming to suspect that they to might be found impeding world peace as well and become subject to liberation and proper democratic governance. It can't be long before we are corrected, maybe, possibly, inevitably. We should do nothing, maybe they will ignore us.

And the oil.

 

[CDNBear]

horseshtt

Just in case you forgot I was the first one here to say that what went on in Syria and what goes on with ISIS is none of our fúcking business.

You also said the same 'right wingers' here that condemned Osama for being weak, condemn him now for being an imperialist.

I'm waiting to see some quotes to back that up.

 

[gore0bsessed]

Obama's right to bomb ISIS. And so are the Middle Eastern countries which are joining in. I think the British Parliament will also vote in favour of military action tomorrow. I'm almost certain that people in Britain will wake up on Saturday morning and see on the news that RAF Tornados or RAF Typhoons have been bombing ISIS targets.

With a Briton having already been beheaded by these thugs, and at least another two, including one from my neck of the woods, also having been paraded in front of the cameras, it's imperative that Britain join in the campaign.

Canada should also join in, too, unless Canadians don't mind them waking up one morning and finding the ISIS flag fluttering from their parliament building. Canada's so lefty liberal and cringy, though, that they probably wouldn't mind.

OK, but ISIS isn't in 7 countries.

 

[darkbeaver]

OK, but ISIS isn't in 7 countries.

Well we know how out of touch investigative journalism and intelligence agencies are so who's to say ISIS isn't everywhere just waiting for a homing pigeon to drop in with a note.

 

[JLM]

Lac Megantic was corporate terrorist crime JLM, it's cheaper to burn down a town than it is to crew maintain properly

It was the result of negligence, instead of setting X number of brakes, he set fewer. I'm 99.999% sure it wasn't planned. If it was planned why would he have set any brakes?

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

Up to a couple of weeks ago right wingers on this forum were condemning Obama for being too weak on ISIS and Syrian dissenters. Now they are calling him too imperialistic. Funny how their criticism changes with the differences in the headlines.

Actually I don't think goreobsessed is a right winger. And I think it's about time the Bamster stepped up.

 

[CDNBear]

Actually I don't think goreobsessed is a right winger. And I think it's about time the Bamster stepped up.

Karl Marx is to conservative for the gopher.

 

[darkbeaver]

It was the result of negligence, instead of setting X number of brakes, he set fewer. I'm 99.999% sure it wasn't planned. If it was planned why would he have set any brakes?

So they don't plan to save money?

 

[gopher]

Actually I don't think goreobsessed is a right winger. And I think it's about time the Bamster stepped up.

You're not the only one who has said that as anyone who has read earlier posts here on the subject know only too well.

 

[EagleSmack]

horseshtt

Just in case you forgot I was the first one here to say that what went on in Syria and what goes on with ISIS is none of our fúcking business.

Moving the goal posts again?

Who is disputing what you said about Syria?

I want to see all the right wingers in this forum who said Obama was weak on Syria and who are now calling him imperialistic. From your post there must a lot.

Personally I am glad he's striking back at ISIS.

 

[CDNBear]

We aren't likely to see an admission of error from the rodent. He's kind of sad like that.

Oh gopher, we're still waiting...

 

[gopher]

The two deluded right wingers need to have their hands held. I'll give you a couple of examples of right wingers saying Obama's "weakness" in the region is what inspired ISIS:

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/hot-topics/125915-barack-obama-wimp-conservatives-ask.html




just one more:

Colpy: "Obama's abandonment of the people of Iraq was the catalyst for the rise of ISIS in Iraq."




You'll need to click on search and do your homework like good little boys if you want more.


http://forums.canadiancontent.net/hot-topics/127665-what-should-obama-do-prevent.html

 

[CDNBear]

The two deluded right wingers need to have their hands held. I'll give you a couple of examples of right wingers saying Obama's "weakness" in the region is what inspired ISIS:

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/hot-topics/125915-barack-obama-wimp-conservatives-ask.html

just one more:

Colpy: "Obama's abandonment of the people of Iraq was the catalyst for the rise of ISIS in Iraq."

Well that's half your claim, as weak as it is. You said "all the right wingers". You posted a quote from one, and haven't shown where he said now Obama is being imperialistic.

You'll need to click on search and do your homework like good little boys if you want more.

Ummm, no, that's not how this works. Your claim, you prove it, or you're a liar.

 

[gopher]

You asked for ''Show me a quote from a supposed 'right winger' condemning Obama for being weak'' - you asked for ONE and you got it.



Show me where I said "All right wingers".

Now it's your turn to prove what you said.

 

[CDNBear]

You asked for ''Show me a quote from a supposed 'right winger' condemning Obama for being weak'' - you asked for ONE and you got it.

That's not all I asked.

But thank you for proving you're a liar.