Motar, how about you count the number of times you cite yourself and comment favourably on your own posts, and think about what that might mean about who you are. Your thread title gives it away, there's no other way but yours because you've got a divinely granted lock on what's true and there's no possibility that you could be wrong. Except that I'm convinced you are, and not just a little, but stunningly, egregiously wrong, and the weight of evidence is with me. Your evidence consists entirely of one very old text from a credulous and superstitious pre-scientific and largely pre-literate age, and anecdotal interpretations of various emotional states. Selfsame is just as certain as you are, of very different claims based on a very different text, but the same emotional states. Does that tell you anything?