NO AUTISM In Never-Vaccinated Children
- Thread starter Stretch
- Start date
The vaccine supposedly has but it seems to be limited to this year's vaccine and is only in the thimerosal (preservative) and therefore in minute quantities. There is 50 µg of thimerosal in each 0.5ml dose of the vaccine and that means there is 0.000025 µg of Hg per 0.5ml dose.
The safety limit is 2ppb.
Last edited:
Karrie suggested that Canada removed mercury from vaccinations, but as Public Health states, the normal flu vaccine, and the H1N1 vaccine, and hepatitis vaccines all have thimerosal (a mercury based compound) in them.
Me, I don't think it's an issue, but I wanted to point out that, for those who do care, there is mercury in these vaccines.
Me, I don't think it's an issue, but I wanted to point out that, for those who do care, there is mercury in these vaccines.
That's fine but the amount is a lot smaller than the safety limit. 25/100,000 of 0.0000001 g is really really really small.
And as they said, it's less than you' get from eating a can of tuna.
But that doesn't stop people from being scared of it.
But that doesn't stop people from being scared of it.
Im not claiming to be an expert on the situation, but someone told me that people who have children in there later later years tend to have kids born with autsim....
I said from their vaccination schedule meaning regularly scheduled vaccines that they give toddlers (to which none you listed belong, or they are scheduled for long after autism would be diagnosed). Sorry for the confusion.
The article's main premise is to point to more and more mercury, correlating to more and more autism. When the facts are that mercury in vaccines generally is on the decrease, and the increase in cases can be attributed to better medical understanding and diagnosis.
Moreover, there has been NO substantive studies to implicate that these autism cases are related to a genetic link that causes problems for the kidneys excreting the mercury. I haven't even seen a physiological study investigating that mechanism.
It's the same thing as hurricanes. We didn't really have a huge increase in the number of hurricanes this century, we just have better coverage and reporting of them.
The snide persuasions in the article that the epidemiological evidence depends on the researcher is without merit. If there are conflicting results, it probably means that some researchers are better at designing experiments. Reviews of this faux-controversy routinely have bio-statisticians on the panels to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the studies, and they all conclude that this link is non-existant.
Moreover, there has been NO substantive studies to implicate that these autism cases are related to a genetic link that causes problems for the kidneys excreting the mercury. I haven't even seen a physiological study investigating that mechanism.
It's the same thing as hurricanes. We didn't really have a huge increase in the number of hurricanes this century, we just have better coverage and reporting of them.
The snide persuasions in the article that the epidemiological evidence depends on the researcher is without merit. If there are conflicting results, it probably means that some researchers are better at designing experiments. Reviews of this faux-controversy routinely have bio-statisticians on the panels to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the studies, and they all conclude that this link is non-existant.
