Yeah, I know. There are tons of "real" bills, so what? Does every bill get passed?
The time to oppose bills is before they get passed.
Yes. In Canada. The country where Emery lives, started a political party, and ran his business openly. He even paid taxes here.
Emery broke the law in the Untied States, they have the right to prosecute him under their laws. Now I'm not saying it isn't extreme, but he still broke the law.
They have a right to prosecute him if he goes to the US. He didn't do that though. He was arrested in Canada for breaking US law. It is the equivalent of us charging US citizens with gun crimes under Canadian law if they never set foot in this country.
Then I said "how is this different from what is happening now?" Then I went onto ask you if (in your opinion) Canada wasn't already aiding and abetting war crimes in Afghanistan. SEE?
While I have many questions about what Canadians troops have been involved in in Afghanistan they have been under the direct control of the United States. Once the initial fighting was over, our role was described mainly as one of peacekeeping. That seems to changing. Or haven't you been following this story either.
What am I defending, exactly? What movement?
Your attempts to denigrate the story, and those who think it is important, are an attempt to defend the Bushites whether you realize it or not.
What would you think if called something you were concerned about a lot of hype, giving the impression that anybody who shared your concern was possibly a little feeble-minded?
If Canadians commit crimes in the United States, they have the right to prosectute. Just as we have the right, but probably shouldn't, right?
So we should demand the arrest of any gun dealer we suspect of selling a gun that ended up in Canada?
Seems they are already taking orders, our brass is doing what their brass tells them. And our guys already have a history of war crimes to their credit.
Do you have any facts to back that up? The last war crimes Canadian soldiers were involved in resulted in those soldiers being charged and their unit being disbanded.
I thought we were discussing it, but I fail to see what unsubstantiated "what if" dialogue will do in the process of
constructive thinking.
Your "discussion" pretty much amounted to saying that it wasn't important and there was no point in discussing it.
Even in your last remark about the last two U.S. elections, you neglect to offer citation as to the original Bill which will not now, nor ever make it though.
Now you are adding other matters to your concerns such as fraudulent election process.
Since this would allow Bush to run again and there are serious questions about fraud in the last two elections he was involved in, concerns about election fraud are very relevant.
My first post here in response to JJW1965's concerns were legit and I thought sorted the matter out for him and now you. Your rebuttal offers no facts other than your opinion - and your concern is valid - if the facts are in fact, facts.
I see no facts in your posts, just your opinion that this isn't important enough to discuss, at least for Canadians. You asked why we should care and I answered. You didn't like the answer. Tough titty.
