NeoCons Faked Moon Landing to Control Interplanetary Oil Supply

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Don't believe me? Read it on the Internet!

Bill Kaysing was a librarian/writer of technical publications and advanced research at Rocketdyne Systems from 1956 to 1963. He states that it was estimated in 1959 that there was a .0014 chance of landing man on the Moon and returning him safely to Earth. This took into account the effects of radiation, solar flares and micro meteorites. He could not believe in 1959 that man could go to the Moon.

However, only 2 years later, American President John F. Kennedy set a goal in May 1961, when he made the following famous speech. 'I believe that this nation should commit itself. To achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind or more important for the long range exploration of Space.' It was just eight years later in 1969, that man finally left Earth and set foot on the Moon... Or so we have been led to believe.

I would like to show you some astonishing evidence that shows glaring mistakes or anomalies on the 'official record' of NASA film footage and still photographs. I have included the actual official Apollo film footage on this page to illustrate and also possibly educate you, the reader, of the anomalies and to let you see with your own eyes what has become one of the biggest cover-ups in the history of Mankind. I will also explain why the US Government has tried to keep this a secret for over 30 years.
I would like to suggest that if Man did go to the Moon during the missions, the Apollo films that we were told were filmed on the Moon are bogus and not the real footage. Evidence suggests that Man could not travel to the Moon's surface, but instead they had to stay in near Earth orbit within the safety of the Earth's magnetic field that would have protected them from the radiation that is emitted by the Van Allen radiation belt!!!
But why would NASA and the United States bother to fake such an event and to what cause I hear you ask? Please read on and I will explain. Was man too optimistic about what we could actually do in deep space, and was President Kennedy's speech in May 1961 pressure enough to keep the hoax going?

David Percy is an award winning television and film producer, a professional photographer and also a member of the Royal Photographic Society. He is co-author, along with Mary Bennett, of the fascinating book 'Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers' (ISBN 1-898541-10-8). The majority of the film footage on this page is taken from the film 'What Happened on the Moon?', a film that also features Percy and Bennett and one which I strongly recommend if you have an interest in the Apollo missions (details of how to purchase the video are at the bottom of this article). Percy firmly believes that the Apollo footage was either faked or not the original film that was shot on the Moon. He believes that many anomalous features that would alert the eagle eyed viewer, could have been placed in the films by whistle blowers who were deeply dissatisfied to be a part of the cover-up. He has studied the entire transfer of the original film on video tape, a feat that not many people have done. What many people did not realize at the time was that a lot of the footage was actually pre-recorded and not live at all.

... continued






Fake picture


Can you see the oil derrick in the reflection of this "astronaut"?


George HW Bush is from Houston. NASA is in Houston. George W Bush is his son. Dick Cheney is his pal. Houston is in Texas. So is oil. A coincidence? Only a fool would think so.
When is Congress going to investigate what really happened in 1969?
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
.0014% chance seems pretty good in 1959. I thought it would be closer to zero at that time.

The bottom photo is amazing. I didn't know Bush and Cheney went to the moon.
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
I strongly urge all "truthers" to immediately abandon thier doomed 9/11 cause and take up this conspiracy. I squinted and can see the oil derrick,but squint a little bit more and you can see JFK also.
 

YoungJoonKim

Electoral Member
Aug 19, 2007
690
5
18
Fantastic, another conspiracy theory on "moon"


I really see no other reason for oil because space craft is a oil-monster.
Yummy, oil.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Don't believe me? Read it on the Internet!

When is Congress going to investigate what really happened in 1969?



Who cares if peoples were stupid enough to put enormous amount of money in either faking a moon landing or a real?


i don't and i never will.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
Who cares if peoples were stupid enough to put enormous amount of money in either faking a moon landing or a real?


i don't and i never will.


That has to be the funniest post you've ever made, considering the crap you put on here every day.

Thank you for making me laugh, I'll be thinking of this all day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DurkaDurka

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
That has to be the funniest post you've ever made, considering the crap you put on here every day.

Thank you for making me laugh, I'll be thinking of this all day.



Well tell me, what is the point of debating this? there is absolutly none.