Ya that's what all your posts make me do.
Especially the ones you pretend to be objective in.
Ya that's what all your posts make me do.
Do we need people warehouses or do we need rehabilitation facilites?
Ya that's what all your posts make me do.
Especially the ones you pretend to be objective in.
Ya, I guess that is about all you have, after being exposed for a partisan hack.
Ya, I guess that is about all you have, after being exposed for a partisan hack.
Post #1579021 - Re: NDP clarifies Mulcair stance on marijuana Bad mentalfloss
:roll:
Yes, I already knew you were scraping the bottom of the barrel with...
It's a whip vote, so they are free to go against the grain, but would lose some perks like free travel.
It really depends on how much we value the strength of a party's overarching platform.
Ya, I guess that is about all you have, after being exposed for a partisan hack.
Post #1579021 - Re: NDP clarifies Mulcair stance on marijuana Bad mentalfloss
:roll:
It's already clearly obvious that you can't defend your partisan crap.
It's already clearly obvious that you can't defend your partisan crap.
There's no need to keep proving it.
I know eh.Somebody has a sense of humour and somebody's mad.
What's so partisan about proposing more freedom for individual MPs to vote their conscience? This could apply equally to the right and the left. Mulcair and Harper seem excessively controlling of their Caucuses. Both New Democrat MPs and Conservative MPs have voted against their parties on occasion.
I really don't see what would be so partisan about such a proposal.
Neither do I. Maybe you should reread the thread.What's so partisan about proposing more freedom for individual MPs to vote their conscience? This could apply equally to the right and the left. Mulcair and Harper seem excessively controlling of their Caucuses. Both New Democrat MPs and Conservative MPs have voted against their parties on occasion.
I really don't see what would be so partisan about such a proposal.
Now that's funny.Troll gets trolled.