Nazi Twitter

B00Mer

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca


Seriously?? So Twitter is basically saying you shouldn't defend your property from these criminal looters.

Personally I say shoot them dead, these are not protestors, they are criminals.



I am sure if Twitter's office was under attack they wouldn't defend their property or staff if under attack.
 
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Yep as usual misinterpreted Trump's meaning, it was meant as a thwart to upscaling violence not as an action to be used. Where as the Iranian threat was a call to arms, go figure.
 
Avro52

Avro52

Time Out
Mar 19, 2020
3,635
5
36
Twin_Moose said:
Yep as usual misinterpreted Trump's meaning, it was meant as a thwart to upscaling violence not as an action to be used. Where as the Iranian threat was a call to arms, go figure.
Click to expand...

Are you high?

I guess Walter Headley was misinterpreted as well.

TSS.
 
Blackleaf

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,932
1,910
113
What do you expect from Twitter?

It's just a safe space for left-wing thugs and big mouths to attack anyone they hate, which is probably most people.

Stay away from it.
 
Blackleaf

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,932
1,910
113
Tecumsehsbones said:
It's in the Magna Carta, y'know.
Click to expand...

I know you're disappointed about that. You're not really a big fan of free speech and individual rights, hence why you love the lockdowns so much.

You're the type of person who has no problem with Twitter regulating what people say "because it's a private company" but hate it when privately-run bakeries refuse to bake cakes for queer couples.
 
S

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
B00Mer said:


Seriously?? So Twitter is basically saying you shouldn't defend your property from these criminal looters.

Personally I say shoot them dead, these are not protestors, they are criminals.



I am sure if Twitter's office was under attack they wouldn't defend their property or staff if under attack.
Click to expand...






Oh come on now!


Just CONSIDER the size of lawsuit that Twitter would launch against the govt



FOR FAILING to protect them "properly"!



Half of Twitter could retire nicely on the kid of damages the TWITS would be demanding!


The trouble with LIE-berals is they see nothing wrong with ORDERING COPS to go resolve nasty situations


WITH GUNS DRAWN - but LIE-berals HAVE A MELT DOWN if the general public wants to protect itself!
 
Blackleaf

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,932
1,910
113


The days of Twitter’s blatant bias and removal of comments against conservative users is coming to an end thanks to the God Emperor himself.

This should be an interesting development...

 
Dixie Cup

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,317
4,024
113
Edmonton
Lets hope that Trump wins the Congress & Senate and can reverse the 1996 decision that no one can sue Twitter because it's a "platform" and not a publisher. It sure the hell looks like they're a "publisher" now because they are determining what can and cannot be said. They're not just a "platform" anymore. They are actually dictating what you can and can't say. Totally different from what was initially intended.
 
S

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Tecumsehsbones said:
Boomer and Moosie hate it when private companies do as they please with their property.
Click to expand...






And in RELATED NEWS - most people HATE IT when looters do as they please with the property of others!


And stupid lawyers with too much time on their hands make the entire profession LOOK BAD


by trying to defend looters as you are doing!
 
Serryah

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,860
2,737
113
New Brunswick
Tecumsehsbones said:
Boomer and Moosie hate it when private companies do as they please with their property.
Click to expand...



Considering the amount of times - aka years - that Trump has had free reign to spread his BS of lies... now he's throwing a temper tantrum because Twitter is finally saying on a tweet of his that what he's saying isn't exactly true?

Irony is they left up his call for investigation into Scarborough for a murder that wasn't, and when the husband of the woman who died asked Twitter to remove the tweet, they said no.

Go figure.
 
Tecumsehsbones

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,326
9,516
113
Washington DC
Dixie Cup said:
Lets hope that Trump wins the Congress & Senate and can reverse the 1996 decision that no one can sue Twitter because it's a "platform" and not a publisher. It sure the hell looks like they're a "publisher" now because they are determining what can and cannot be said. They're not just a "platform" anymore. They are actually dictating what you can and can't say. Totally different from what was initially intended.
Click to expand...
"Intended" by whom?

By the way, the crazy fat kid keeps telling us how rich he is. Why doesn't he set up his own social media company? He's a businessman, ain't he?

Oh, right. Doesn't want to compete with Stormfront.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom