Mozilla CEO Resigns Amid Controversy Over Stance Against Gay Marriage

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Your opinions definitely matter as they relate to your role in the company. As CEO, you are pretty much always a representative of the company, so it would be perfectly legitimate for them to be concerned about any causes that he was openly supporting or opposing while CEO.

But this was a private donation made 6 years before he was chosen as CEO. There seems to be no indication that he was ever publicly advocating against gay marriage in any forum, much less in any way relating to Mozilla.

It just seems so crazy to reduce someone to one choice that has nothing to do with his work at the company.

The PC crowd runs anyone down that disagrees.
That is their tolerance.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
Ok boys and girls, have a gander:

Barack Obama on Gay Marriage - YouTube

Where was that criticism when the mainstream media was carrying Obama on their shoulders on his way to the White House in 2008?

Now,

‘Should he be impeached?’ A reminder about who had same definition of marriage as ex-Mozilla CEO

News that, in 2008, former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich donated $1,000 to the effort to pass California’s Proposition 8 in support of traditional marriage has culminated in Eich being forced to resign as head of the company. Some are even claiming that Eich’s position on the issue means he’s not fit to run a large organization.

Can we retroactively apply the same “rules” the Left is demanding? Where was this kind of outrage a mere few years ago? Those are among the questions being asked.

President Obama didn’t change his position on the issue of gay marriage until the spring of 2012, but we don’t recall the Left insisting that disqualified him from the presidency.

Holding a pro traditional marriage opinion while running a tech company though is apparently a total disqualifier.


read the whole thing with the prog tweets too:

‘Should he be impeached?’ A reminder about who had same definition of marriage as ex-Mozilla CEO | Twitchy


cram it mozilla. the board should be fired.

Obama explicitly did not share the same view as those who supported Prop 8. If you watch that clip past the first few seconds, he is asked if he would support a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as being between and man and a woman, and he said no. Proposition 8 was about amending the constitution of California to define marriage as being between a man and a woman.

The PC crowd runs anyone down that disagrees.
That is their tolerance.

But if you look at other threads, apparently I am part of the PC crowd, so how does that make sense?
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
So the guy is fired ('resigned' is always euphemism for being sacked in executive positions) because he gave a legal contribution to a political proposition.. AS a private individual.. based on religious or moral sentiments.

One would be hard pressed not to see an encroaching persecution by a tyrannical philosophical orthodoxy.

Proposition 8 by the way, PASSED, with a majority of the voters. So exactly WHO made up this 'firestorm'. You can guess it was the well financed and organized homosexual lobby who are able to muster media, orginizational and political resources for targeted attacks.

They can be fought. When the patriarch of Duck Dynasty made some obscure remarks supporting traditional marriage, they went into action... as advertisers and retail outfits found themselves pressed to remove business support.

That resulted in a backlash as boycotts were organized against those who capitulated to the threats.. AND the whole thing just disappeared. And the lobbyists crawled back under their rocks to await easier targets.. like the frail spirits at Mozilla.
 
Last edited:

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Was it official company policy for someone not to hold this prejudice?

Should an organization have the freedom to hire the people they feel are appropriate and say fukk off to the rest?

And he chose to leave didn't he?

He could have stayed and just apologized.

He could have stayed....full stop.

No apology necessary.

****'em. The man has a perfectly valid political/religious/philosophical belief, there is NO need for him to apologize to anyone.

ONLY the left thinks we all have to read from exactly the same playbook......which is why they should always be kept from the levers of power.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Chrome anyone?

 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Obama explicitly did not share the same view as those who supported Prop 8. If you watch that clip past the first few seconds, he is asked if he would support a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as being between and man and a woman, and he said no. Proposition 8 was about amending the constitution of California to define marriage as being between a man and a woman.



But if you look at other threads, apparently I am part of the PC crowd, so how does that make sense?

That is because you fail to heed what I post. But there is hope for ya.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
lmao.....because he is the scourge of the world every thing that currently happens is his fault.. and every chance to attack him must be taken...doncha know... it's pay back for the all comments made about the moron who came before him...it's entertaining no?

to see how he lives in the minds of the right...

Actually, it's just the normal operation of America's polarized political culture. It's the way we roll. The next president will be demonized just like Bush and Obama.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67
I'm sure as hell not dumping FF but the self-righteous haughty hypocrites at mozilla will likely get their share of 'social media' and long term grief without my help. Those pricks.





We shouldn’t forgive Brendan Eich for his homophobic past—yet

Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich stepped down yesterday amid controversy about his 2008 contribution to the campaign to enact California’s infamous anti-gay referendum, Proposition 8. Over the last two decades, voters across the United States broadly supported similar legislation that has specifically targeted, personally offended, and directly harmed members of the gay community.

But a dramatic and rapid shift in public opinion over the last few years has brought widespread acceptance of same-sex couples. Many who showed anti-gay animus in the past now sincerely regret their hurtful actions. Should people live in fear that their history of homophobia will come back to haunt them?

In Eich’s case, the controversy surrounded his refusal to reconcile his political support for Prop 8 with his ability to lead a company that values LGBTQ acceptance and inclusion. (Slate’s Will Oremus has eloquently explained why Eich’s resignation was the right move.)

But every individual with homophobic skeletons in the closet must have cringed at the sight of a private individual being held accountable in such a public way for past bigotry. While 59% of Americans now support marriage equality, the same percentage opposed it just 10 years ago. In other words, today’s society is no longer a comfortable place for homophobes. And that’s a good thing...

* * *
As for me, I have never held any particular animus against gays or even cared it they wanted to marry. But I am very disturbed over how this has been handled. Being against homosexuality is now becoming a social taboo. Break it, and you become a worthless cast-out, and you are certainly likely to lose your job.

But the odd thing is, many of the same people who agitated for this man to step down are encouraging the wave of third world migrants to the West, even though few of them have a Western attitude to gays. It is true that the second generation may see things differently, but there one group that is not going to change: Muslim true believers.

Would this man have been asked to step down if everything had been the same except that was a Muslim? Somehow I do not think so. And thus not only are we becoming more and more intolerant of dissent, we are tolerating the grotesquely intolerant, even encouraging them to move here.

I just do not understand how the left thinks. If immigration and demographic trends continue (Muslims have lots of kids, as we have noted before), the gay lobby may find itself in a very different place in a generation or two.


Blazing Cat Fur: We shouldn’t forgive Brendan Eich for his homophobic past—yet
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Most Christian opponents of gay marriage oppose gay marriage; they don't oppose the right of gays to advocate it. But increasingly gays oppose the right of Christians even to argue their corner. Gay activists have figured that, instead of trying to persuade people to change their opinions, it's easier just to get them banned.

Celebrate Conformity! :: SteynOnline


Humm, you se to know a lot about taking it in the backdoor.. lol

It is better to give than to receive, my son.

(did I say that??)