Their own interests now is it? Before it was mother Russia they were dying for, now it's their own interests. Those interests would likely be what? Freedom from nazi tyranny? Freedom from having to goose step? Oh how about this one, Hey this is our country, get out nazi's? Those wouldn't be the interests you so flippantly refer to, would they?
I am morethen aware of the British Empire, I have been a subject of it for my entire life. But your inferences and tonality, are expressing an Imperialist ideal. The war against German nazi's was far from an Imperialist war. It was a war to defend freedoms and rights. Period. ?
But your occupation puts you in the drivers seat of what others will learn. And as we have seen here today, you know not of what you speak. That is dangerous and the root of all evil.I should have been more specific, "their" refers to the governments of the day, and governments by their very nature are interested in preserving their own interests. The war was a war of ideologies, part two of WW1.
My vocation is not the subject of debate, so I am confused as to why you feel it necessary to mention it or insult its purpose.I have not attacked your occupation.
But your occupation puts you in the drivers seat of what others will learn. And as we have seen here today, you know not of what you speak. That is dangerous and the root of all evil.
I can dissagree with anyone, and still like that person, just ask Daz Hockey.I think perhaps it would do you a world of good to learn the meaning of "discussion". You seem to think that insults and name-calling are the fodder of intelligent discourse. My disagreeing, or agreeing, with you on any point, or vice versa has nothing what-so-ever to do with my occupation, or yours. It neither implies that I dserve to be called names(ie"roadkill) because I disagree with your point of view, nor does it suggest one should adopt an attitude of confrontation with those one disagrees with. Since you seem to find these methods of conversation necessary, I shall be the one to cease the conversation on these points.
not the crusades, but the early roman state religion and its "convert or die" approach within the empire was the framework for everything that followed in the christian tradition. "go convert" is built into a religion that draws from an expansion mentality, and like an expanding empire, people expanding the faith have used many dirty tricks in their quest to spread the "message". Do things like virus infected blankets distibuted by missionaries, or the old "we have food, but only if you pray with us" apprach of missionaries. Indeed, christianity is driven by is dogma of it being the "only way", a great way to keep an empire's minions in line (even if in the early efforts to do so the church had to adopt the pagan rituals, resulting in christianity being a pagan, non-abarahamic abrahamic religion)Check your world history, People of the world, tribes and religion and culture, fought aggressively, for land, and for the wealth that went with it. Christianity was not spread with aggressive action...and if you are referring to the Crusades, it began because Christians travelling to the Holy Lands were being captured and as entertainment for the Muslims' they were be publically tortured until they died...
go ahead and idealize your bondage. Listen to you go on about how "you" are free because somebody else is "less free". Thank you for demonstrating exactly what I talk about.You need to leave Canada, you have had an overdose of freedom...go spend a year in africa, then come and leacture us about freedom. War is a fact of humanities struggle, and it has shaped the world you live in today, the freedom you are enjoying as you type these 'progandized alternative' perceptions of yours.
--curiositykid
This indicates someone who things that freedom just happens, and bad things happen to bad people...very very sad....and spoilt by being coddled in life...go spend some time in africa...
I'm curious as to your definition of "free" caracal.not the crusades, but the early roman state religion and its "convert or die" approach within the empire was the framework for everything that followed in the christian tradition. "go convert" is built into a religion that draws from an expansion mentality, and like an expanding empire, people expanding the faith have used many dirty tricks in their quest to spread the "message". Do things like virus infected blankets distibuted by missionaries, or the old "we have food, but only if you pray with us" apprach of missionaries. Indeed, christianity is driven by is dogma of it being the "only way", a great way to keep an empire's minions in line (even if in the early efforts to do so the church had to adopt the pagan rituals, resulting in christianity being a pagan, non-abarahamic abrahamic religion)
go ahead and idealize your bondage. Listen to you go on about how "you" are free because somebody else is "less free". Thank you for demonstrating exactly what I talk about.
Freedom just happens? No, freedom does not just happen. People are quite good at thinking themselves free when they are not though. You set a good example of that.
You last point is closely related to keeping up with the Jones's. I feel free, therefore I must be, even though I'm in the banks pocket, I must have something I can barely hold on to.bear,
Let me begin with two simple scenarios:
1 You have a pet cat, it was born in a house, raised and hand-fed in a house, it has never run outside the house. The cat would consider itself free to run about the house. Should you then impose a further limit (such as locking it into a room) the cat may well immediately cry to get out of the room, not because the room is not comfy but only because of the limitation of movement through the house.
2 You adopt a "wild" domestic cat. It is a cat that lived its entire life outside. It may show periods of contentment inside, but it consistantly displays a yearning to go outside.
Freedom is defined by parameters, either percieved or real. So long as you are the cat in scenario 1 where the limits on you are not so limiting as to impede what you have become habituated to see as being free, you will experience no internal conflict and see yourself as "free", ignoring or rationalizing the limits placed on you as irrelevent to "your freedom". "you are free to run about the house and that is all you want".
Watch carefully how people define their freedom not in terms of what they can and can not do, but moreso in terms of what they can and can not do compared to somebody else. You see somebody able to do something you can't, and you want it (a form of the scarity effect). You see somebody more constrained than yourself and you reinforce your belief of being free.
Look at the "average canadian", who earns less than 40K, is carrying a high mortgage, probably has enough savings to retain current setup for a few weeks if his/her job was lost, and objectively ask how free the individual is.
OK, you start it and I"ll follow.True freedom is perhaps viewed as a state of mind.
Anything one holds onto has a limiting effect on a "true freedom".
I don't think I should go further on this in this thread, as to delve deeply into it we should start a thread on freedom in the philosophy section perhaps.
A good question to ponder would be "is there a true freedom?". We define everything by boundaries. If we were boundless, would we comprehend "freedom"?
oppresses freedom ongoing by the nature of it's cult, there is only hypocracy to claim that freedom is gained by murder and oppression.
only those with god are free. madness.
Among all the flowers that evoke the memories and emotions of war is the red poppy, which became associated with war after the publication of a poem written by Col. John McCrae of Canada. The poem, "In Flander's Field," describes blowing red fields among the battleground of the fallen.
For more than 75 years, the VFW's Buddy Poppy program has raised millions of dollars in support of veterans' welfare and the well being of their dependents.
The VFW conducted its first poppy distribution before Memorial Day in 1922, becoming the first veterans' organization to organize a nationwide distribution.
The poppy soon was adopted as the official memorial flower of the Veterans of Foreign Wars...It was during the 1923 encampment that the VFW decided that VFW Buddy Poppies be assembled by disabled and needy veterans who would be paid for their work to provide them with some form of financial assistance. ..
Today, VFW Buddy Poppies are still assembled by disabled and needy veterans in VA Hospitals.
The minimal assessment (cost of Buddy Poppies) to VFW units provides compensation to the veterans who assemble the poppies, provides financial assistance in maintaining state and national veterans' rehabilitation and service programs and partially supports the VFW National Home for orphans and widows of our nation's veterans.
In Flander's Field
by John McCrae
In Flanders Fields the poppies blow,
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky,
The larks, still bravely singing, fly,
Scarce heard amid the guns below.
We are the dead.
Short days ago,
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved and now we lie,
In Flanders Fields.
Take up our quarrel with the foe
To you, from failing hands, we throw,
The torch, be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us, who die,
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow,
In Flanders Fields.
source-Legion Athletic Camp
In 1962 the Legion began a summer sports camp at the International Peace Garden which is run to this day, and has helped to train over 30,000 school age athletes.