That's it, make it a right/left argument, instead of a forward discussion on addressing the underlying causes.The last time the right wanted to invest in social programs was in what century? It would be laughable to hear Republicans promoting an investment in sociology (or any ology) because no one would believe it for a second.
That's the point.
And although I agree that semi auto weapons only aid in so doing. We need to address the cause, not the means.
You can ban all the weapons you want, but at the end of the day we haven't addressed the issue.
Yep, but first they have to be identified and so far many of these heinous acts have been committed by people who haven't been fully or properly identified.
Although detention is an option, it is a tricky topic of discussion.
We have to weigh the rights of everyone.
People don't like doing that.
Yet every time (almost 100% of the time) mass killers are described as someone no one would every expect to do it. So what comes of the grand mental health plan, incarcerate everyone who seems too unlikely to kill? Relying on the wisdom of psychologosts and psychiatrists to weed out future murderers is not going to work. Most family members can't identify these risks let alone strangers whom they have never met before.
Absolutely. And by allowing the discussion to be solely focused upon that part of what is really a much larger issue, we do nothing to advance. We just keep going around in circles. I'm tired of that.
Where it starts is by opening up the discussion to the more relevant aspect of these tragic situations, the question of why. What we are doing, what we always seem to constantly be doing, is focusing on how. Who cares, we know how these things are being done, nothing is to be gained by going back and forth on that. The why though, that's the real question that needs to be answered. It's not a quick answer, it's not an easy answer, but we have to start taking it seriously.
Nobody wants to face the mental health problem as always. Why? Probably because they are worried they might be the one in ten people with an acute disorder and they don't even have a gun.As per usual, and this is directed towards no one in particular but is just a general observation, we once again have a horrendous tragedy occurring in which far too many people, in this case very small children, were needlessly killed. And instead of focusing on the real culprit, the mental and emotional deficiencies that drive people to these acts, everyone (the media, public officials, the general public) is once again focused on the "tool" that is used to carry out said act.
No wonder this **** keeps happening over and over again.
I think we start by starting to talk about it. It's not easy at all. It can be very difficult to wrap your head around a lot of these illnesses that we can't see with our eyes, it can be damned near impossible for some people to really even believe it exists at all. And that's the real wall we need to break through.Yep, there's probably a dozen different "whys", from low self esteem, attacting attention, revenge, pissed off at the world, just curious as to if they pull it off etc. etc. etc. There are probably a thousand different "hows". Eliminate one (which is impossible) and there's still 999 more. I personally don't have a clue as to even where to start to solve the problem. Reducing poverty?
Nobody wants to face the mental health problem as always. Why? Probably because they are worried they might be the one in ten people with an acute disorder and they don't even have a gun.
So then how do we change that?
I'm not claiming to have any of the answers but one thing I absolutely no for sure is that we will never have the answers if we don't start asking the questions!
I think we start by starting to talk about it. It's not easy at all. It can be very difficult to wrap your head around a lot of these illnesses that we can't see with our eyes, it can be damned near impossible for some people to really even believe it exists at all. And that's the real wall we need to break through.
It's easy for most of us to identify the drooling guy in the straight jacket in the corner as mentally ill. He's probably going to be getting, hopefully, the help that he needs. It's far more difficult for those who's troubles are not so obvious. I consider myself a fairly open minded individual and even though I've taken the time to try to observe those in my life who are dealing with some relatively minor issues (anxiety, adult ADD, depression), and I can see it and the difficulties it cause them when I look, even I have a difficult time not dismissing their 'complaints'.
Nobody wants to face the mental health problem as always.
.. and not one is killing people with an assault rifle.In British Columbia about 25 years ago they closed the main asylum in the province and turned the inmates loose supposedly for families to look after!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now we have several thousand "loose cannons" wandering the streets in poor health and poverty. Maybe more compassion is a place to get started.
No the real issue, the underlying issue, the elephant in the room that all the jerked knees want to ignore is, mental health.That would just be a deflection from the real issue; there are too many guns in too many hands that can kill en masse.
It's already been pointed out that they are very good for predator control.There is no logical reason to own an assault weapon.
Nope, they used hatchets, knives, sticks, their hands and so on... and not one is killing people with an assault rifle.
Give us a flippin break, the day you can identify who will be the next school shooter is the day hell freezes over. As JLM said, they let everyone out of institutions in BC 25 years ago. None of them are killing people. Only the ones you would never suspect. Mental health is a bogus deflection of the real issue. The more guns there are the more gun killings there will be.No the real issue, the underlying issue, the elephant in the room that all the jerked knees want to ignore is, mental health.
It's already been pointed out that they are very good for predator control.
Nope, they used hatchets, knives, sticks, their hands and so on.
The quantity is alway higher with a semi automatic weapon, but the underlying issue, is generally the same.
Where there's ill will there's a way.
You stand by the right to butcher the unborn yet want of abolish the right of gun ownership even though deaths from violent gun crimes are just a mere minuscule fraction of the total you think think were rightfully butchered.The gun profiteering lobby has always used personal responsibility and no government intervention in anything as their response to anything. It would not be possible to take any government sociological program suggestion of their's very seriously. That would just be a deflection from the real issue; there are too many guns in too many hands that can kill en masse. There is no logical reason to own an assault weapon.
.. and not one is killing people with an assault rifle.
The gun profiteering lobby has always used personal responsibility and no government intervention in anything as their response to anything. It would not be possible to take any government sociological program suggestion of their's very seriously. That would just be a deflection from the real issue; there are too many guns in too many hands that can kill en masse. There is no logical reason to own an assault weapon.
Yes, it will be ignored because the gun rights crowd have ALWAYS ignored everything. Remember, it's all about personal responsibility in their view. That is the answer to everything. You will NEVER in a million years get anywhere on mental health with all the rightwing bozos in the room.So say we can magically get rid of every gun on the planet. So what then, all problems solved? We still haven't addressed the underlying issue of why. What is it exactly about the why that everyone just wants to completely ignore????
That's not what has been forwarded here.Give us a flippin break, the day you can identify who will be the next school shooter is the day hell freezes over.
I Googled mentally ill murders in BC.As JLM said, they let everyone out of institutions in BC 25 years ago. None of them are killing people.
You have offered nothing to support that assertion.Only the ones you would never suspect. Mental health is a bogus deflection of the real issue.
Stats have disproved that false claim.The more guns there are the more gun killings there will be.
Yes, when I posted the stats on those, it was conveniently ignored.You stand by the right to butcher the unborn yet want of abolish the right of gun ownership even though deaths from violent gun crimes are just a mere minuscule fraction of the total you think think were rightfully butchered.
Not nearly as well as the pro choice crowd.Yes, it will be ignored because the gun rights crowd have ALWAYS ignored everything.
Or the left wing kneejerking bozo hypocrites...:roll:Remember, it's all about personal responsibility in their view. That is the answer to everything. You will NEVER in a million years get anywhere on mental health with all the rightwing bozos in the room.