Mom of suspected school shooter -- first to die -- was avid gun enthusiast

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
The last time the right wanted to invest in social programs was in what century? It would be laughable to hear Republicans promoting an investment in sociology (or any ology) because no one would believe it for a second.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The last time the right wanted to invest in social programs was in what century? It would be laughable to hear Republicans promoting an investment in sociology (or any ology) because no one would believe it for a second.
That's it, make it a right/left argument, instead of a forward discussion on addressing the underlying causes.

Good thinking... :roll:

BTW: I think we could use the same reasoned discussion for Canada.

But that would be unbelievable too, because we have a neocon in the PMO I guess.
 
Last edited:

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
That's the point.

And although I agree that semi auto weapons only aid in so doing. We need to address the cause, not the means.

You can ban all the weapons you want, but at the end of the day we haven't addressed the issue.

Absolutely. And by allowing the discussion to be solely focused upon that part of what is really a much larger issue, we do nothing to advance. We just keep going around in circles. I'm tired of that.

Yep, but first they have to be identified and so far many of these heinous acts have been committed by people who haven't been fully or properly identified.

Where it starts is by opening up the discussion to the more relevant aspect of these tragic situations, the question of why. What we are doing, what we always seem to constantly be doing, is focusing on how. Who cares, we know how these things are being done, nothing is to be gained by going back and forth on that. The why though, that's the real question that needs to be answered. It's not a quick answer, it's not an easy answer, but we have to start taking it seriously.

If we continue to do what we've always done, we will continue to get what we always got.

Although detention is an option, it is a tricky topic of discussion.

We have to weigh the rights of everyone.

People don't like doing that.

Whether they like doing it or not, it needs to be done. Because this whole "ignore it and it'll go away" attitude that we seem to have is getting us no where fast. Everyone suffers the way we handle mental illness now, from the patients themselves to entire communities when something goes very wrong.

As horrendous as the actions were that this young man committed, we need to remember (difficult and unpalatable as it may be) that he was also someone's child. I'm trying to picture what it would be like if one of my children were to be so afflicted, tormented as to possibly commit such an act. Where would I go for help? Would I be able to see what could be coming down the pipe?

See I think this is the real reason we focus on the gun control aspect of these debates, because we don't want to face the more human questions.

Don't misunderstand me, I'm not trying to defend or mitigate his actions. But when I step back and look at it, all I can see are failures that cannot just be placed at the feet of the parents but at the feet of us all.

Yet every time (almost 100% of the time) mass killers are described as someone no one would every expect to do it. So what comes of the grand mental health plan, incarcerate everyone who seems too unlikely to kill? Relying on the wisdom of psychologosts and psychiatrists to weed out future murderers is not going to work. Most family members can't identify these risks let alone strangers whom they have never met before.

So then how do we change that?

I'm not claiming to have any of the answers but one thing I absolutely no for sure is that we will never have the answers if we don't start asking the questions!
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Absolutely. And by allowing the discussion to be solely focused upon that part of what is really a much larger issue, we do nothing to advance. We just keep going around in circles. I'm tired of that.



Where it starts is by opening up the discussion to the more relevant aspect of these tragic situations, the question of why. What we are doing, what we always seem to constantly be doing, is focusing on how. Who cares, we know how these things are being done, nothing is to be gained by going back and forth on that. The why though, that's the real question that needs to be answered. It's not a quick answer, it's not an easy answer, but we have to start taking it seriously.

Yep, there's probably a dozen different "whys", from low self esteem, attacting attention, revenge, pissed off at the world, just curious as to if they pull it off etc. etc. etc. There are probably a thousand different "hows". Eliminate one (which is impossible) and there's still 999 more. I personally don't have a clue as to even where to start to solve the problem. Reducing poverty?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,434
14,311
113
Low Earth Orbit
As per usual, and this is directed towards no one in particular but is just a general observation, we once again have a horrendous tragedy occurring in which far too many people, in this case very small children, were needlessly killed. And instead of focusing on the real culprit, the mental and emotional deficiencies that drive people to these acts, everyone (the media, public officials, the general public) is once again focused on the "tool" that is used to carry out said act.

No wonder this **** keeps happening over and over again.
Nobody wants to face the mental health problem as always. Why? Probably because they are worried they might be the one in ten people with an acute disorder and they don't even have a gun.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
Yep, there's probably a dozen different "whys", from low self esteem, attacting attention, revenge, pissed off at the world, just curious as to if they pull it off etc. etc. etc. There are probably a thousand different "hows". Eliminate one (which is impossible) and there's still 999 more. I personally don't have a clue as to even where to start to solve the problem. Reducing poverty?
I think we start by starting to talk about it. It's not easy at all. It can be very difficult to wrap your head around a lot of these illnesses that we can't see with our eyes, it can be damned near impossible for some people to really even believe it exists at all. And that's the real wall we need to break through.

It's easy for most of us to identify the drooling guy in the straight jacket in the corner as mentally ill. He's probably going to be getting, hopefully, the help that he needs. It's far more difficult for those who's troubles are not so obvious. I consider myself a fairly open minded individual and even though I've taken the time to try to observe those in my life who are dealing with some relatively minor issues (anxiety, adult ADD, depression), and I can see it and the difficulties it cause them when I look, even I have a difficult time not dismissing their 'complaints'.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Nobody wants to face the mental health problem as always. Why? Probably because they are worried they might be the one in ten people with an acute disorder and they don't even have a gun.

As the old Quaker once said to his wife "Everybody in this world is a little queer methinks, except for me and thee and sometimes I even have my doubts about thee"
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
So then how do we change that?

I'm not claiming to have any of the answers but one thing I absolutely no for sure is that we will never have the answers if we don't start asking the questions!

The gun profiteering lobby has always used personal responsibility and no government intervention in anything as their response to anything. It would not be possible to take any government sociological program suggestion of their's very seriously. That would just be a deflection from the real issue; there are too many guns in too many hands that can kill en masse. There is no logical reason to own an assault weapon.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I think we start by starting to talk about it. It's not easy at all. It can be very difficult to wrap your head around a lot of these illnesses that we can't see with our eyes, it can be damned near impossible for some people to really even believe it exists at all. And that's the real wall we need to break through.

It's easy for most of us to identify the drooling guy in the straight jacket in the corner as mentally ill. He's probably going to be getting, hopefully, the help that he needs. It's far more difficult for those who's troubles are not so obvious. I consider myself a fairly open minded individual and even though I've taken the time to try to observe those in my life who are dealing with some relatively minor issues (anxiety, adult ADD, depression), and I can see it and the difficulties it cause them when I look, even I have a difficult time not dismissing their 'complaints'.

In British Columbia about 25 years ago they closed the main asylum in the province and turned the inmates loose supposedly for families to look after!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now we have several thousand "loose cannons" wandering the streets in poor health and poverty. Maybe more compassion is a place to get started.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
Nobody wants to face the mental health problem as always.

It's long past the time when it needs to be faced, whether people want to or not. The biggest problem facing the mentally ill is not the illness itself, but the attitudes towards it.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
In British Columbia about 25 years ago they closed the main asylum in the province and turned the inmates loose supposedly for families to look after!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now we have several thousand "loose cannons" wandering the streets in poor health and poverty. Maybe more compassion is a place to get started.
.. and not one is killing people with an assault rifle.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
That would just be a deflection from the real issue; there are too many guns in too many hands that can kill en masse.
No the real issue, the underlying issue, the elephant in the room that all the jerked knees want to ignore is, mental health.

There is no logical reason to own an assault weapon.
It's already been pointed out that they are very good for predator control.

.. and not one is killing people with an assault rifle.
Nope, they used hatchets, knives, sticks, their hands and so on.

The quantity is alway higher with a semi automatic weapon, but the underlying issue, is generally the same.

Where there's ill will there's a way.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
No the real issue, the underlying issue, the elephant in the room that all the jerked knees want to ignore is, mental health.

It's already been pointed out that they are very good for predator control.

Nope, they used hatchets, knives, sticks, their hands and so on.

The quantity is alway higher with a semi automatic weapon, but the underlying issue, is generally the same.

Where there's ill will there's a way.
Give us a flippin break, the day you can identify who will be the next school shooter is the day hell freezes over. As JLM said, they let everyone out of institutions in BC 25 years ago. None of them are killing people. Only the ones you would never suspect. Mental health is a bogus deflection of the real issue. The more guns there are the more gun killings there will be.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,434
14,311
113
Low Earth Orbit
The gun profiteering lobby has always used personal responsibility and no government intervention in anything as their response to anything. It would not be possible to take any government sociological program suggestion of their's very seriously. That would just be a deflection from the real issue; there are too many guns in too many hands that can kill en masse. There is no logical reason to own an assault weapon.
You stand by the right to butcher the unborn yet want of abolish the right of gun ownership even though deaths from violent gun crimes are just a mere minuscule fraction of the total you think think were rightfully butchered.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
.. and not one is killing people with an assault rifle.

You've got me a little confused Kreskin, I take it you think assault rifles are a non issue (which I mainly agree with) but you also seem to be against people owning them. I think SLM summed it up succinctly, in saying "why" is the issue not "how".
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
The gun profiteering lobby has always used personal responsibility and no government intervention in anything as their response to anything. It would not be possible to take any government sociological program suggestion of their's very seriously. That would just be a deflection from the real issue; there are too many guns in too many hands that can kill en masse. There is no logical reason to own an assault weapon.

So say we can magically get rid of every gun on the planet. So what then, all problems solved? We still haven't addressed the underlying issue of why. What is it exactly about the why that everyone just wants to completely ignore????
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
So say we can magically get rid of every gun on the planet. So what then, all problems solved? We still haven't addressed the underlying issue of why. What is it exactly about the why that everyone just wants to completely ignore????
Yes, it will be ignored because the gun rights crowd have ALWAYS ignored everything. Remember, it's all about personal responsibility in their view. That is the answer to everything. You will NEVER in a million years get anywhere on mental health with all the rightwing bozos in the room.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Give us a flippin break, the day you can identify who will be the next school shooter is the day hell freezes over.
That's not what has been forwarded here.

But I can see why you would want to address that strawman.

As JLM said, they let everyone out of institutions in BC 25 years ago. None of them are killing people.
I Googled mentally ill murders in BC.

You are incorrect.

Only the ones you would never suspect. Mental health is a bogus deflection of the real issue.
You have offered nothing to support that assertion.

The more guns there are the more gun killings there will be.
Stats have disproved that false claim.

You stand by the right to butcher the unborn yet want of abolish the right of gun ownership even though deaths from violent gun crimes are just a mere minuscule fraction of the total you think think were rightfully butchered.
Yes, when I posted the stats on those, it was conveniently ignored.

In Canada alone there are 100,000 abortions/year. While we have fewer than 100 deaths by firearms of children.

I can only imagine whatt he stats are in a country with the population of the US.

Yes, it will be ignored because the gun rights crowd have ALWAYS ignored everything.
Not nearly as well as the pro choice crowd.

Remember, it's all about personal responsibility in their view. That is the answer to everything. You will NEVER in a million years get anywhere on mental health with all the rightwing bozos in the room.
Or the left wing kneejerking bozo hypocrites...:roll:
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,434
14,311
113
Low Earth Orbit
If Little Red Riding Hood had a .223, she would have showed up a grandma's cottage with a high value wolf pelt thanks to a clean through and through.
 
Last edited: