Mini-nukes at 9-11...... 26 videos-
- Thread starter mayety
- Start date
I don't know about mini nukes. It's obvious to the naked eye that 100 story buildings can't fall in 10 seconds without demolition explosives though. That and where the hell are the planes in Washington and Pennsylvania? And how did building 7 fall? I don't know all of what was done, but something was done. And Michael Moore knows the truth but won't connect the dots because he's a paid politico. When he was asked about why he doesn't just say it was an inside job he responded with something along the lines of, because I love my country. Not because it isn't true. But because we, the sheople, are better off thinking it's not true.
Aw jeez, another 911 foiler. Watch the videos, and pay attention. At 10 seconds, the debris cloud was about 40 stories high, you can't see what's happening anymore, it's a total fallacy to claim the buildings fell in 10 seconds, and you can easily see in that 10 seconds that things are breaking off the buildings and falling faster than the buildings are falling. They did not collapse at free fall speed, and the collapse doesn't look anything like a controlled demolition. A controlled demolition begins at the bottom, the towers began to collapse at the level where the planes hit them.
There are just too many reasons why that couldn't have happened. Buildings don't fall from fire. And like I said, where are the planes at the pentagon and in PA? Why did building 7 fall? Even if you're statement here was true, it still doesn't explain anything. There are a thousand reasons why it's an obvious inside job. There is actually no evidence to suggest it isn't. I can agree to disagree with you. It is a rare day when somebody that has convinced themselves 9/11 happened how they say it happened, changes over and believes the truth instead, because nobody wants to believe that something like that could happen. It did happen though.
You really think an administration that couldn't deal intelligently with Hurricane Katrina could orchestrate 911 as an inside job and successfully blame it on somebody else? There are explanations available for all your questions, many of them have been posted here in other threads over the years, but people like you just deny them. It's pointless trying to convince people like you of anything that doesn't suit your prejudices because you won't look at the real data. But here are the facts: on 11 Sept 2001 four airplanes were hijacked by Islamist terrorists, two of them were flown into the WTC towers 1 and 2, one hit the Pentagon, and the fourth crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. Building 7 was heavily damaged by debris from the collapse of WTC 1 and 2, and eventually collapsed as well after burning for most of the day. That's it, that's what happened.
Nope. But like I said, I can agree to disagree because our opinions are unstoppable forces meeting immovable objects. You think I believe what I want because I have a prejudiced opinion in some way. I believe that you are unwilling to face the truth. I respect your opinion and your right to have it. I'll just never agree with it, on this matter. I was a believer, for years. I never really examined the issue until a couple years back. I am 100% certain in my mind that it's an inside job.
NEVER? Nothing like keeping an open mind. If somebody could produce some solid evidence it was an inside job I'd change my mind. Nobody has, it's all just speculation and ill-informed BS, and there are satisfactory explanations for all of it.
Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage
Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage
Last edited:
I think you'll notice most people who have responded so far have agreed that on some level or another there was either some inside interference or inside negligence that's beyond belief.
but you do remember both towers were hit by two separate planes right?
How did Building 7 fall?
Dexter seems to explain that pretty well.
I've seen demolitions before and I've seen buildings collapse on their own weaknesses and the towers did not get demolished by explosives.
I already explained in my first post exactly how they fell.
Jet fuel burning for an extended period of time on multiple floors will gradually increase the heat and temperature of not just the area on fire, but the steel structure.... and regardless of whatever metal the structure was built with, metals will lose their solidity and begin to melt at certain temperatures.
melting metal, means less support for the weight above it...... eventually all that weight will not just move through gravity, but will build up momentum and speed...... each floor is designed to support a level of weight but not dramatic impact and certainly they're not designed to support multiple floors of equal weight as itself, times the amount of floors above it for total weight..... and thus will collapse.... creating a chain reaction through the building as more and more floors collapse they build additional central weight and more momentum..... which is why the buildings produced a pile of debris and dust clouds from the area in which the planes crashed.
In regards to smoke and debris rising from the foundation areas of the towers, keep in mind that those foundations are not exactly designed to support their entire structure collapsing on top of itself and due to the vibrations, shaking and additional pressures that come with a multi-story, multi-tonne tower falling in on itself, the foundation area would crush like an egg shell and shortly after the top begins to collapse as described above, the bottom area would also in turn, begin to weaken and collapse..... thus making the towers crumble in two places, which in turn would increase the speed in which the buildings fell.
These were big buildings, bigger then average buildings.... if they were almost as wide as they were tall, then chances are the buildings just might have not completely collapsed and could probably be still standing today, even if the areas that were on fire did melt the structure in those areas.... the overall mass and weight of the building would have been balanced more across the wider structure, like someone lying on a bed of nails...... as there would have been more structure to support the weakened areas.
But with long and tall towers, it's mass and weight is centralized and you have less structure able to support a given area...... and if you weaken 2/3's or 3/4's of the structure required to support the overall body, what structure is left intact can not support all the weight, if there is too much weight above it to handle.
If the planes crashed near the top floors, then again, the towers might not have collapsed..... but it wasn't just two or three floors left above the impact area..... there were multiple floors with lots of weight.
There simply is no other need of another explanation the evidence does not support besides the above.
The question then remains: How did these clowns on the planes get pass so much security, so many warnings from not just US intelligence, but allied nations issuing warnings and information about an impending attack?
From what I gathered, alarm bells were all over the place and yet there didn't seem to be any interception aircraft available in any of the areas, and the responses were slower then molasses coming out of a cows utter...... not to mention Bush's piss poor response time in jumping on this incident.
Either someone in the government let them commit these attacks.... or somebody really dropped the ball so badly that they deserve not only a public inquiry into what happened, but an execution for their gross negligence.
In either case, someone in the government is responsible, either in-part or entirely.
Let's just leave the OS about the planes and highjackers out of ther picture for now, as there is no proof...no passenger lists, pictures of them boarding etc. They were a distraction. They are all? alive?
I like the theory of smaller remote controlled planes loaded with airplane parts hitting the building (and somehow not bouncing off, as I would if I ran into a building) just preceded by a missile.
I came across a page that is very interesting on this theory. One plane and a helicopter doing in the two towers and flight 93.
NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet
and note other links on the page
As far as the Pentagon is concerned, a missile hit it and a plane flew over --I believe that was the plane Cheney was talking about, re orders, but the orders were to NOT shoot it down.....just a hunch, so a plane could be blamed, not their own missile.
How about posters' ideas on this info?
I like the theory of smaller remote controlled planes loaded with airplane parts hitting the building (and somehow not bouncing off, as I would if I ran into a building) just preceded by a missile.
I came across a page that is very interesting on this theory. One plane and a helicopter doing in the two towers and flight 93.
NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet
and note other links on the page
As far as the Pentagon is concerned, a missile hit it and a plane flew over --I believe that was the plane Cheney was talking about, re orders, but the orders were to NOT shoot it down.....just a hunch, so a plane could be blamed, not their own missile.
How about posters' ideas on this info?
Last edited:
The rebuttals have all rebutted with 9/11. You can waste your breath saying this or that happened and it wasn't a demolition but who are you really trying to convince? Not me. I'm not stupid. I know it's scientific nonsense that 3 buildings fell at incredible speed into their own imprints with no demolitions and only 2 planes. And if somebody is on here explaining building 7, the lack of planes in PA and Washington, then they are doing more than the officials have, in this case, and are likely talking straight out of their a$$es.
Not only that but cell phones didn't work on airplanes until 2004. Ask anybody in the aviation industry. It's literally impossible for anybody to have made a cell phone call that lasted more than 1 second before being lost on September 11, 2001. It can't be debated even. It's flat out lunacy to think otherwise.
Not only that but cell phones didn't work on airplanes until 2004. Ask anybody in the aviation industry. It's literally impossible for anybody to have made a cell phone call that lasted more than 1 second before being lost on September 11, 2001. It can't be debated even. It's flat out lunacy to think otherwise.
You're sounding a bit angry, considering the cell phones have already been ruled out and that the conversations were faked.
The pentagon was hit by a missile, with a plane, not Fl #77, as a cover to flyover as a detraction, as per Cheney's orders to the aide as he was announcing the distance out of the plane...the order was likely to NOT shoot down the plane as it wasn't going to hit the Pentagon.
If anyone wants to know anything, there is so much to research, then take what seems to be the most likely, such as my post above yours.
Last edited:
To organize all of this is in an inside job though. The ins and outs of how it was done don't change that it happened.
Exactly.... who really gives a flying fk what actually happened?
Seriously, chances are it was an inside job on some level..... so what?
What do any of you think you will accomplish in exposing any chance of truth?
Justice?
That'll be the day.
Who are you going to arrest and charge?
Under what laws are you going to charge this person or these people?
With all the crap Dick and Bush pulled over the last decade, there has already been a large list of things to charge them for, or at the time, impeach.
Yet that never happened did it?
Nobody stood up and took serious action to do something about these clowns and those who worked for them.
Now they're sitting comfortably at their ranches and fancy homes with all their money and don't seem to have a care in the world...... in their eyes, they got off scott-free and nobody can touch them.
The only time anybody came close to touching them was when that Iraqi biffed his shoe at Bush and called him a dog.
That's the closest thing you'll ever see to "Justice"
It could have been planes, it could have been terrorists, it could have been missiles, hurricanes, earthquakes, bombs or Dick & Bush personally smashing out the foundations of the towers with sledge hammers themselves....... it no longer matters because nothing will ever be done.
And not one US politician will stand up to support the call for Justice because either they previously backed Bush and Dick's plans and it would compromise their positions and money in their pockets, or they'll face a mysterious death.
So in reality..... nothing will ever be done and Bush will spend the rest of his days in comfort & riches and die as an old bag of farts with nobody laying a finger on him.
So quite honestly, you're all just wasting your time.
It's not about arresting people. it's about changing the consciousness of the population. A knowledgeable population will take political action to restore liberty. After all, the Tea Party movement was actually primarily 9/11 truthers at it's start up point. They've been hijacked, for sure, but every mind freed from the matrix is a start. The end game is actually throwing the international banking community, who's really responsible for all things, out of their dictatorial power over the world.