Martin 'a jackass' - Parents of slain teen say.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Breakthrough2006

Electoral Member
Dec 2, 2005
172
0
16
Let's see what Canadians think of Martin's brilliant idea.

MAPLE -- Prime Minister Paul Martin is a "jackass" if he thinks that banning handguns will "choke off" the deadly weaponry of Toronto street gangs, says a man whose son was slain.

"For this so-called prime minister of ours to come into the low-income areas of this city and make a statement banning guns ... I look at him as a jackass ... and I'll never vote Liberal again as long as I live," said Theodore Huxtable, whose eldest son Jason, 18, was killed on Aug. 30.

And Huxtable gave a stern warning that if justice is not served in his son's death, he will seek his own vengeance.

"I'll be part of your news ... I've told police the same thing ... they say 'Mr. Huxtable, you shouldn't make these statements' ... they can't say I didn't warn them," he said.

Huxtable said his family's grief is so overwhelming that he just doesn't care.

His eldest son, Jason Huxtable, a loving, friendly, gentle, hard-working churchgoer, was slain in his car at a Magellan Rd. townhouse complex, near Jane St. and Shepherd Ave., in broad daylight as he drove there to give a female friend a ride.

He was not a criminal and did not have gang links. His parents believe he was shot out of envy.

His alleged killer is a 15-year-old boy who is charged with second-degree murder. Under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, his name cannot be published.

Martin made his controversial handgun ban statement Thursday during a campaign stop at a community centre in the violence-plagued Jane-Finch area.

His proposal would impose a national ban on handguns and double minimum sentences for trafficking and smuggling guns or carrying loaded guns.

Huxtable said teen gangs will ignore Martin's proposed law in much the same way they ignore the current law.

"This man goes into the ghetto and says he wants to ban guns -- they are laughing at him," he said yesterday.

Bitterly angry at his son's murder and the relative lack of response to more than 50 gun-related murders in Toronto so far this year, Huxtable said desperate measures are necessary.

He is furious youths are treated with kid gloves and he accused politicians and other leaders of racial bias.

"Black on black ... who gives a rat's ass," he said with sarcasm.

"No white kids are getting killed."

He also lamented how high-profile leaders expressed such outrage over the desecration of headstones at a Jewish cemetery earlier this year, while the gang issue is largely ignored.

Huxtable said the only politician who has contacted him about his son's death is Toronto Councillor Jane Pitfield, a mayoral hopeful.

Once steadfast Liberals, Huxtable and his wife Yvette, both Jamaican immigrants, now say Liberal crime policies help create teen gang violence.

Sitting in the comfortable living room of their Maple home yesterday, the couple noted they once lived in the Driftwood "ghetto" where Martin announced he would ban guns.

A few years ago, when the Huxtables had put together enough savings -- Theodore from his job with Lufthansa and Yvette from Shopper's Drug Mart -- they moved their sons Jason and his younger brother Justin, now 15, to Maple.

They note the much- maligned Driftwood area has produced doctors, engineers and Olympic athletes.

Poor parenting, a lack of core values, inappropriate role models and few, if any, consequences, due to soft youth laws, fuel the gun violence, Huxtable said.

Building more community centres in the "ghetto" areas is not the answer, Huxtable said, because it will only create more "headquarters for criminals."

Existing centres need more staff, programs and security, he said.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Hand guns have no other purpose

than to kill people. Breakthrough, I assume from the way you presented this topic that you are in favour of handguns. The man who lost a child to a hand gun should be in favor of getting the damn things off the street.
 

Breakthrough2006

Electoral Member
Dec 2, 2005
172
0
16
Insinuating that I am in favour of guns would be sayng that the father who lost his son is also in favour of hand guns.

You seem to have missed the entire point of the article.

Banning hand guns which have been banned since 1930 anyway will do absolutely NOTHING to solve the gun violence in Canada, It was just another cheap publicity stunt by the Liberals to gain votes while doing absolutely nothing to address the issues. (looks like it backfired) MUCH tougher gun laws are what we need. If you get caught with a gun, there should be a minimum 5 year sentence. Commit a crime with a gun, minimum 10 year sentence. Kill someone with a gun and you should be locked away for life. REAL life, not the life the judges give which is 25 years minus 10 years for good behaviour which ends up being 15 years.

The banning of handguns at an expense of $350 million will do just as much good as the 2 Billion dollar gun registry. NOTHING.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
#juan said:
Hand guns have no other purpose

than to kill people. Breakthrough, I assume from the way you presented this topic that you are in favour of handguns. The man who lost a child to a hand gun should be in favor of getting the damn things off the street.

Now you have pissed me off.

I own handguns. My brother owns handguns. Many, if not most, of my friends own handguns. My father, the most decent man I have ever met, owned handguns.

We all used them. None of us EVER pointed one at anybody, much less killed anyone.

The idea that handguns are only good for killing people is absolute BULLSHIT!

MORE IMPORTANTLY, who the hell are you to tell a man who just lost his son what he should think or do?
The elitism, the lack of humility, the all-powerful belief that the left, and the left alone have been blessed with knowledge of truth is so sickening, and so typical of the damned social engineers that run this country.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
Handguns are designed to kill people. That is what they are made for. If you use them for something else, so what...the Liberal plan allows you to keep them.

So drop the fake indignant act. Quit with the charges of elitism too. The CPC is full of elitists, including Harper and MacKay.

Martin's plan also went further than just the handgun ban. Perhaps you guys should read the policy instead of the op-ed columns in the right-wing press.
 

Breakthrough2006

Electoral Member
Dec 2, 2005
172
0
16
Handguns are designed to kill people. That is what they are made for. If you use them for something else, so what...the Liberal plan allows you to keep them.

So then it's NOT a complete ban on hand guns. You are correct Rev but the Liberal press release made it clear that it was a ban on handguns. Lies upon lies.

Quit with the charges of elitism too. The CPC is full of elitists, including Harper and MacKay.

You should do some research on the party leaders. Martin was born into a millionaire family and is himself a self made multi millionaire. That would make him an "elitist". Harper was born into a middle class family and is not even a millionaire much less a multi-millionaire. It is in fact the Liberals that are elitists.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Martin 'a jackass' -

Martin was born into the family of Liberal MP. He made himself a millionaire.



Harper was/is part of the Calgary School...a neo-conservative group that pushes the elitist political teachings of Leo Strauss. Harper headed the NCC...an elitist lobbying/pressure group that form to privatise medicare.

Notice that I didn't say that Martin wasn't an elitist, just that Harper was too.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I like the point that was made that in response to tragic gun deaths in mainly poor neighborhoods, this proposal will buy guns back from middle class Canadians.

Don't see how it will help.

I'm in favour of gun control, but this plan seems utterly stupid. Utterly. I guess Martin doesn't want any votes outside of Toronto. But that's his call. He's going to be burned big time in Atlantic Canada over this one thing.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
Breakthrough2006 said:
.
) MUCH tougher gun laws are what we need. If you get caught with a gun, there should be a minimum 5 year sentence. Commit a crime with a gun, minimum 10 year sentence. Kill someone with a gun and you should be locked away for life. REAL life, not the life the judges give which is 25 years minus 10 years for good behaviour which ends up being 15 years.
.

"His proposal would impose a national ban on handguns and double minimum sentences for trafficking and smuggling guns or carrying loaded guns"
That's what is in the article, so isn't that close to what you want when it comes to jail time? Doubling sentences seems like a step in the right direction to me.

I personally don't care if there is a handgun ban or not. They don't hold any value to me and the way some gun owners handle them makes me less than sympathetic to their cause.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Anything that reduces the number

of handguns on the street has got to help. The gun owners all cry, "Guns don't kill, people kill". I would change that to; "People with guns kill". just like people with knives and people with clubs or whatever. If Martin announced his intentions limit handguns in a neighborhood that has had a lot of gun violence, so be it. I wonder if the people who were shot would object to Martin's plan to further reduce the number of handguns on the street. It seems that because the shootings have mostly involved black people from a couple of neighborhoods in Toronto, it is somehow racist to bring it up.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
#juan said:
Anything that reduces the number

of handguns on the street has got to help. The gun owners all cry, "Guns don't kill, people kill". I would change that to; "People with guns kill". just like people with knives and people with clubs or whatever. If Martin announced his intentions limit handguns in a neighborhood that has had a lot of gun violence, so be it. I wonder if the people who were shot would object to Martin's plan to further reduce the number of handguns on the street. It seems that because the shootings have mostly involved black people from a couple of neighborhoods in Toronto, it is somehow racist to bring it up.

Just for the sake of argument, let's say that Martin succeeds in removing every handgun from the streets of Canadian cities.

The punks then take up sawed of rifles and shotguns, which kill much more effectively than handgun.

I knew one guy that was murdered with a gun. He was a criminal, it was about 1975, he was doing a dope deal in a car, and the seller killed him with two shots to the chest.....with a sawed off .410 shotgun loaded with slugs. Shot him because he was black, BTW.

That sawed off .410 was vastly more powerful than the .38s and 9mms on the street now.

The most deadly short range weapon on earth is a 12 ga. pump action shotgun.

I guess the gov't would be after them next.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
A sawed off 410

with slugs would be about as accurate as the worst handgun and harder to conceal. On the other hand, punks with guns are probably not worried about accuracy. A 12 ga. pump shotgun loaded with buckshot is probably the most dangerous gun out there but damned hard to conceal. Besides, they can get both those guns now. We don't need tougher gun laws, we need tougher sentences for gun offences.
 

Breakthrough2006

Electoral Member
Dec 2, 2005
172
0
16
Anything that reduces the number

of handguns on the street has got to help.

I'm sure the drug dealers and gang bangers are going to line up to give up their hand guns. :roll:

That's what is in the article, so isn't that close to what you want when it comes to jail time? Doubling sentences seems like a step in the right direction to me.

Not even close. Right now it's a one year sentence which will be changed to 2 years. And that's if the gun is used in committing a crime.

Notice that I didn't say that Martin wasn't an elitist, just that Harper was too.

I'm surprised that you would actually admit to your propoganda.
 

yballa09

Electoral Member
Sep 8, 2005
103
0
16
Rexburg, Idaho
Dont most of the people that commit crimes with these handguns already possess them illegally? So what good would banning them do, the criminals will always find alternative ways to get them. I agree with juan who said that we dont need tougher gun laws, we need tougher sentences for gun offences. Martin has gone a step in the right direction, but i think more needs to be done to really address this problem.
 

the caracal kid

the clan of the claw
Nov 28, 2005
1,947
2
38
www.kdm.ca
The gun problems stem from deep within society.

I do not think bans of any kind ever work. I also do not think that "getting tough" with stiff/long sentencing accomplishes anything other than creating a large prison population.
 

Calberty

Electoral Member
Dec 7, 2005
277
0
16
It's hard to argue with Martin's policy. why not spend a billion dollars trying to ban handguns when two provinces have already announced they won't participate in enforcing the ban.

Ottawa, Ontario pandering to Torontonians. AGAIN. Time for more decentralization and vigilant protection of Provincial rights.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
I've heard it said that most illegal guns are simply legal ones that have been stolen from those legal gun owners. These guns aren't all being smuggled in from China are they?
 

Grover Knight

Nominee Member
Dec 10, 2005
51
0
6
Tougher sentences on people who use guns in crimes. Restrictions on Hand Guns, and that is it.

I am tired of the ghetto world spilling across Canada. They dont hammer down on the crooks, but pass laws that effect all of us.

I live in the country and need my gun, for hunting, protection from dangerous animals, and I plumb like guns. For some inner city problem, to have an effect on me is ludicrous. The last murder committed here by a gun was in 1884. There is simply no murder here. To take your leftist shit and cram it down my throat. For me to give up my rights, this is a right, and bow to your inner city problems, is not going to happen. If Toronto wants a ban on guns, go for it. If other big cities want to make it illigal, go for it. Just like the old west, leave your guns outside the city. If you get caught packing heat, you pay the time. If they think that the rest of us, who follow the rules, pay our taxes, and take there shit are going to just kiss there ass..... They can dream a little longer.
 

Grover Knight

Nominee Member
Dec 10, 2005
51
0
6
Hell the RCMP themselves, have made it very public, very known, and very clear, that the guns laws do not work. The money was wasted, the money was foolishly used to register non-criminals. That same money could have been used to upgrade the RCMP, and am sure would have helped stem crimes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.