How true. It wasn't surprising given he's turned to fabricating claims about what business owners in Northern Ontario have allegedly told him about First Nations people. Despite being completely contradictory to their own sworn testimony to two government commissions.I saw that post and while I am in no way the poster-boy for forum manners, that was pretty low.
That's the proverbial hitting the nail on the head.In the end, Canuck is pulling at straws and hoping that by virtue of one miniscule little technicality (in his eyes) that he can make an argument and extrapolate this vagary to support a losing position... Hence the over-posting of dresses with camo fabric.
Although I do feel sorry for him, and anyone that is forced to be in his presence, I like dark humour, so I find a lot of humour in his pathetic flailing.Pretty sad, really.
Stop it, you're starting to sound like EAO again.defense of...is support
non condemnation... is tacit support.
Drat!.... I suppose "shot and pissed on" is one of those favoured sayings gone politically incorrect now.
I agree, there is no honour in what they did. It was wrong. But I can understand why. As a mere human being, I can honestly say, I may have done so myself, if placed in that position.
How true. It wasn't surprising given he's turned to fabricating claims about what business owners in Northern Ontario have allegedly told him about First Nations people. Despite being completely contradictory to their own sworn testimony to two government commissions.
I agree, there is no honour in what they did. It was wrong. But I can understand why. As a mere human being, I can honestly say, I may have done so myself, if placed in that position. The furor, is still puzzling. That doesn't mean I support what they did.
The version of "With God on Our Side"-posted earlier on this thread, cannot match Joan Baez's (1966). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUZGGFOV6FM
Like the kind of respect that sees journalists beheaded on television?
The kind of honor that promotes these Taliban 'soldiers' to drag a body through the streets behind a truck until there's nothing left to drag?
How about the kind of respect for life that sees women marked a nothing more than chattels or tossing a bucket of acid in the faces of little girls?
Is this what you mean by respect for human life?
Like Bear pointed-out; NATO was asked to come in and help a failed state... It's kinda hard to make the assertion that they were invaded when their own gvt pleaded with the international community to come in and provide this much needed assistance.
Ain't that the truth... The only thing you get from the average leftard when they view a live beheading by a terrorist is a "tsk, tsk; what a shame - pass the tea and crumpets please".. But for a US Marine to disrespect a slain foe, well, that's grounds for capital punishment.
Please do show some documentation of where the govt of Afghanistan asked NATO or the UN or the US or anyone else to send military forces in to help a failing nation. Considering the govt was the taliban I doubt you can provide anything legitimate and are just repeating the propaganda you have been spoon-fed by GW Bush and his war-hawk friends.
Funny, I thought it was about what happened on 9/11.Make no mistake, this war was about controling the ME and central Asia and the oil and resources available. It is a simple matter of money and profitability. There is no honor on either side and that is a fact you should face up to one day.
It wasn't. It was just what we were told, but it was utter BS, just like every other BS reason we have been spoon fed to justify killing innocent civilians. 911 was very convenient, way too convenient, when you consider invasion plans were in the works long before 911.I believe the American Government asked the Taliban to hand over Osama Bin Laden and they said he rode away on a white horse.
Funny, I thought it was about what happened on 9/11.
Invasion plans were in the works long before 911.
For Afghanistan? Really, show me those plans please.
BBC News | SOUTH ASIA | US 'planned attack on Taleban'
I doubt that anybody with intimate knowledge of the plan will make them public. But hell, the US had a plan to invade Canada and I'm sure they probably still do. What else are soldiers suppose to do when they aren't fighting wars if they aren't planning for wars?
Stop it, you're starting to sound like EAO again.
I agree, there is no honour in what they did. It was wrong. But I can understand why. As a mere human being, I can honestly say, I may have done so myself, if placed in that position. The furor, is still puzzling. That doesn't mean I support what they did.
LOL...I'm the one sounding like eao? Think about this now. eao rationalizes Palistinian terrorist acts by stating things similar to the way you and others on this thread are doing with this act by u.s. marines. "It may not be right but I understand why they did it". "What the Palistinians do, AQ did/does may not be right, or is definitely wrong, BUT, because of the things the west/Israel has done in the past/present I understand why they do/did it."
BBC News | SOUTH ASIA | US 'planned attack on Taleban'
I doubt that anybody with intimate knowledge of the plan will make them public. But hell, the US had a plan to invade Canada and I'm sure they probably still do. What else are soldiers suppose to do when they aren't fighting wars if they aren't planning for wars?
And how do you know that? Who knows what goes on over there unless it is filmed? They have been clips shown to suggest that torture and executions are performed by NATO troupes. Why not in this case? If they did, do you think the military brass would be advertising it?What they did was wrong, but as I mentioned earlier you can understand what drives Soldiers to do this.
Did they execute - torture live prisoners - No.
What they did was unprofessional. But I along with the Taliban are not making an issue of it.
I'm not sure what your criteria is for which evidence is and which is not acceptable, but it does seem pointless to even try to reason with you as long as you have this attitude - :roll:.This news snippet has nothing to do with what Cliffy posted.
:roll:
Yes.LOL...I'm the one sounding like eao?
I'm not blaming anyone else for the actions of these Marines. They alone own this.Think about this now. eao rationalizes Palistinian terrorist acts by stating things similar to the way you and others on this thread are doing with this act by u.s. marines. "It may not be right but I understand why they did it". "What the Palistinians do, AQ did/does may not be right, or is definitely wrong, BUT, because of the things the west/Israel has done in the past/present I understand why they do/did it."