NAZI. How dare you tell anyone, anywhere what language they havd to speak. You are a fascist.
You're exaggerating.
There are cases when imposing a common language makes sense. Air traffic control, government, natural monopoly. Beyond that, like in most private businesses, any language imposition should favour the least advantaged. The local sign language, International Sign, the local indigenous oral language, Esperanto due to its phonetic spelling that is eadier for dyslexics to read and the Deaf to pronounce.
But I do agree with you overall that language ought to be regulated only as necessary and no more.
Bill 101 doesn't concern itself with the less advantaged at all. It's a power grab. I'd contacted the OQLF a few years ago to confirm that I understood the law correctly, and I had. If a shop in Gatineau should put up a sign in Algonquin (the local indigenous language) followed by French, both in the same language, that would conflict with the law. That the writers of that law had not thought about this reveals their mindset given how obvious it was.
No it isn't.... French is the language they speak in Paris. The versions spoken here vary from community to community, from family to family, or from one fence post to the next. It certainly isn't the French spoken in Saigon or Algeria ... but every one of them is the only "right" one
What? There exists an international standard French and local variants throughout. Francophones can generally understand one another worldwide.