I want to know why guys have to pay for PSAs but PAP smears and boobie crushes are covered (in Ontario)
Limbaugh's message to 'feminazis'
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
PSA is free at hospital clinics (at least Scarborough General) if you don't mind waiting a coons' age at times. I prefer not to wait and so I pay up the $30 ($50 for the extra strength tests) for speedy service.
It's still a scam though.
I wonder if male oral contraception is covered by the insurance policy in question?
Hell, I'll have to check my Blue Cross prescription plan and see if it. I'll check and see if Viagra is on there now. I know when I first bought the package, it wasn't covered.
I think that if Rush was on this forum....he would wonder out loud about her sexual proclivity in regards to gender in which case birth control would be a moot point....;-)
I'd also like to point out, that men do NOT have easy access to oral contraceptives like woman do. It's coming soon though, and finally men will have the same "choices" that women have had for decades. No longer will men be "second class citizens" when it comes to access to convenient oral contraception.
“It is time for men to have some control. I think it would empower men and deter some women out there from their nefarious plans,” says Brown. “Some women are out there to use men to get pregnant. This could deter women from doing this. An athlete or a singer is someone who could be a target and they could put a stop to that.”
Male birth control pill soon a reality - Health - Sexual health - Men's Sexual Health Guide - msnbc.com
somebody quote this so we can see what the board "feminazi" has to say about this.
“It is time for men to have some control. I think it would empower men and deter some women out there from their nefarious plans,” says Brown. “Some women are out there to use men to get pregnant. This could deter women from doing this. An athlete or a singer is someone who could be a target and they could put a stop to that.”
Male birth control pill soon a reality - Health - Sexual health - Men's Sexual Health Guide - msnbc.com
somebody quote this so we can see what the board "feminazi" has to say about this.
Treating cervical and breast cancer which can be fatal is cheaper to catch early and treated. A pap smear involves vaginal swabbing, which is then tested in a lab. . A mamogram involves a costly machine and a qualified technician. A blood test is all a PSA requires, and in some Provinces do pay for it. Prostate cancer caught early is very treatable and rarely fatal.
Quite right......why,your solution could revolutionize marriage and control the population to extinction. I guess you did miss the fact that the University's insurance policy applied to Employees and Staff as well as the student body??
I wonder how the married personnel would feel about your ill-conceived solutions to unwanted pregnancies. (Aside from husbands keeping their zippers up and wives keeping their legs crossed?? )
Wow, you finally admit to being wrong.
Good for you.
Didn't that feel good, being honest for a change?
Can you point out where you got any of that from my posts on the matter?
Hell dude, she can't even remember who said what, in what post.
How do you expect her to actually target posts that would require her to think?
True.... But I'm a guy. Pap smears and mammograms don't do a thing for me. Unfair goes both ways y'know - sort of like cheaper insurance rates for the ladies.
So, having an insurance policy that pays for what the client is willing to pay for is a nanny-state?? It is so annoying when people with religious blindness, seem oblivious of it. Please.......have some regard for actual facts.
The faculty, employees and students are required to pay for the University's chosen group insurance plan, which the University has stipulated must NOT cover birthcontrol. The US Health Department recommends this coverage be made available by insurance companies.
The insurance policy under discussion, is paid for by all of the employees, faculty and students, not the University and which that same University made compulsory. Fluke's stance is that any group insurance forced on the employees, faculty and students, of a University, should at least follow the recommended guidelines laid down by the Health Department of the US.
Those who want prescription coverage for birthcontrol attending this institution, need to carry two insurance policies or pay cash over and above the cost of the inadequate, by government basic standards, of that chosen by the University.
Perhaps I can make this clearer for those with religious blindness.
If the company one works for goes for a group insurance which they stipulated would only cover heart attacks for women, because the company's "belief" that men need to be spiritual enough to rely on prayer only, to prevent the condition. Of course, this policy would be compulsory for all. Just how well would that go over?
