Anyway, CBC & some of the various other legacy media, weirdly or not so weirdly, are openly campaigning for Carney, while pretending to be neutral and objective, constantly bringing up bogus issues like implying that Poilievre’s lack of security clearance means he has something to hide, along with unfounded and unsupported comparisons between the Conservative leader and Trump.
Much of the coverage of the election has been flavoured like this, assuming Liberal Leader Mark Carney is facing
the “crisis” while campaigning against his billionaire buddy in another country, while Poilievre is too busy, uh, attacking the government’s record…during an election…the bastard!!
(YouTube & How much Canada has declined under the Liberals)
Hell, this thread, this very thread, started when the CBC sued the Conservative Party, during an election, and lost, back in 2021. That’s our unbiased government funded media in a
nutbag nutshell.
It is his policies, not Carney's, that would be most effective against Trump
apple.news
On policy, this week, media have tended to ignore the vast differences between the Conservative and Liberal spending plans, suggesting that because the Tories would also run a deficit, they are not much better than the Liberals, which leaves the incumbents off the hook for their much more irresponsible plan, and their record of doubling the federal debt.
Or consider
crime and drugs, issues on which many in the media can’t contain their contempt for the fact that the Conservatives think voters want order in the streets.
If Canada had stuck to 2015 trends, we'd all be $4,200 richer per year, and thousands killed by crime, drugs and health shortages would still be alive
apple.news
The fact that there has been little interest East of Manitoba is seems in what Carney was doing before he ran for the Liberal leadership in January, when he was working and advocating to keep Canada’s natural resources in the ground, which is conveniently ignored to present him as the man who will fix Canada’s economy.
It also makes sense for the Carney Liberals to focus on Trump, because, to the extent it is still a crisis, it will naturally benefit them as the Liberals are the incumbents. Demanding Poilievre effectively replicate the Liberal campaign is what would be a disaster, not the other way around.

As much as some in the media try to suggest
that there is little difference between the Liberal and Conservative platforms, except of course the parts where Poilievre is scary, and thereby implying the Liberals deserve another chance…???…the Tory platform is a genuinely conservative document that offers a clear, and much needed, break with the last 10 years.
Negotiating with Trump, who is inexplicably suspicious of free markets, may be necessary and unavoidable. What should have been avoidable is the weakened state of the Canadian economy. It is Poilievre’s plan, not Carney’s, that corrects this colossal mistake.
Liberals promise massive deficits coupled with Trudeau-style social justice agenda
apple.news