LILLEY: CBC loses lawsuit against Tories while wasting your money

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,281
3,999
113
Edmonton
This is also informative & entertaining.
(YouTube & CBC Reporters HUMILIATED as Independent Media TAKES OVER French Debate Presser)
View attachment 28747
Jagmeet refusing to answer questions unless they came from his idea of “acceptable” media outlets is…telling.
Jagmeet should simply step down. A politician he is not but he is a person who NEVER does what he says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,768
1,253
113
My wife is in San Antonio looking at houses as I type this.
Tied to a lucrative job offer no doubt. Once the novelty wears off you will not be as enthusiastic imo

Better off to buy somewhere in the boonies where you can spend your day clearing land and prospecting for rare minerals. You'll sleep better at night.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,987
10,958
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Anyway, CBC & some of the various other legacy media, weirdly or not so weirdly, are openly campaigning for Carney, while pretending to be neutral and objective, constantly bringing up bogus issues like implying that Poilievre’s lack of security clearance means he has something to hide, along with unfounded and unsupported comparisons between the Conservative leader and Trump.

Much of the coverage of the election has been flavoured like this, assuming Liberal Leader Mark Carney is facing the “crisis” while campaigning against his billionaire buddy in another country, while Poilievre is too busy, uh, attacking the government’s record…during an election…the bastard!!
(YouTube & How much Canada has declined under the Liberals)

Hell, this thread, this very thread, started when the CBC sued the Conservative Party, during an election, and lost, back in 2021. That’s our unbiased government funded media in a nutbag nutshell.
On policy, this week, media have tended to ignore the vast differences between the Conservative and Liberal spending plans, suggesting that because the Tories would also run a deficit, they are not much better than the Liberals, which leaves the incumbents off the hook for their much more irresponsible plan, and their record of doubling the federal debt.

Or consider crime and drugs, issues on which many in the media can’t contain their contempt for the fact that the Conservatives think voters want order in the streets.
The fact that there has been little interest East of Manitoba is seems in what Carney was doing before he ran for the Liberal leadership in January, when he was working and advocating to keep Canada’s natural resources in the ground, which is conveniently ignored to present him as the man who will fix Canada’s economy.

It also makes sense for the Carney Liberals to focus on Trump, because, to the extent it is still a crisis, it will naturally benefit them as the Liberals are the incumbents. Demanding Poilievre effectively replicate the Liberal campaign is what would be a disaster, not the other way around.
1745538730633.jpeg
As much as some in the media try to suggest that there is little difference between the Liberal and Conservative platforms, except of course the parts where Poilievre is scary, and thereby implying the Liberals deserve another chance…???…the Tory platform is a genuinely conservative document that offers a clear, and much needed, break with the last 10 years.

Negotiating with Trump, who is inexplicably suspicious of free markets, may be necessary and unavoidable. What should have been avoidable is the weakened state of the Canadian economy. It is Poilievre’s plan, not Carney’s, that corrects this colossal mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup