Why is knowledge, always incomplete? When one is observing, is one aware that one is observing, or only aware of the thing that is being observed? Does awareness lead to analysis? What is psychological knowledge?
Let's talk.
Let's talk.
Why is knowledge, always incomplete? When one is observing, is one aware that one is observing, or only aware of the thing that is being observed? Does awareness lead to analysis? What is psychological knowledge?
Let's talk.
Why is knowledge, always incomplete? When one is observing, is one aware that one is observing, or only aware of the thing that is being observed? Does awareness lead to analysis? What is psychological knowledge?
Let's talk.
which knowledge are we talking about .?Why is knowledge, always incomplete?
Not completely but subconsciously everything is observed and what is missed by your eye is not missed by your subconscious.When one is observing, is one aware that one is observing.?
Is this a trick question because this awareness has already analysed what is it is that its aware of.!Does awareness lead to analysis?
Remember there are always exceptions to every psychological theory. Psychology is not a exact scienceWhat is psychological knowledge?
Well our session time is over China that'll be two-hundred dollars please.
quandary121
Why is knowledge always incomplete? What is knowledge and what do we mean when we say "I know". You may say,"I know my wife or my husband or my girl or boy friend". Do you really know them? Can you ever know them? Do you not have an image about them? Is the image the fact? So, to know is very limited. Scientific knowledge is also limited; scientists are trying to find out what is beyond matter; although they have accumulated a great deal of knowledge they have not been able to find out so far. Knowledge and ignorance always go together; the unknown and the known. Scientists say: through matter we will find that which may be beyond. But we human beings are matter. Our minds are matter. Why do we not go into this, for if the mind can go through itself, the possibility of coming upon that which is the origin of all things, is much more likely?
Knowledge of oneself is also limited. If I seek to know myself I can study psychology, I can discuss with the psychologists, psychoanalysts, psychotherapists, psychobiologists. But that knowledge is always limited. But if I penetrate into this entity called myself, then there is a possibility of going infinitely beyond.