For those who actually care about the future of Wild Salmon in this country Click Here
Obsessing over the quality of samples? That is ridiculous. The test results that were weakly positive were of poor quality. As has been said many times now, PCR is very sensitive. With samples that are degraded, the test specificity and sensitivity decline rapidly. The Moncton lab will release the results, when the full results are in, which includes other diagnostic tests. Alexandra Morton and all the activists will get their chance to spin the results when they are tabled before Justice Cohen.Dear Minister Ashfield
I would suggest you stop treating us like fools. Your attached letter is grossly inadequate. Download Initial Request for 2011-001-03100.pdf (440.4K) Show us your Moncton test results because your lab is the only one that cannot find ISA virus. I would also suggest you stop obsessing over the quality of the River Inlet samples and go out and get your own samples. You have an entire department at your disposal.
Yes, finally she is calling the tests weak positives. These were most likely false positives. If both ISAV tests have the same sensitivity, and they only hit one positive out of 5 re-runs for gill tissue, and only on one of the tests, and no positves on any of the heart tisse re-runs, then the odds are highly suggestive that this was a false positive.Yesterday I received yet another set of positive ISAv results for salmon of the Fraser River. Download Report231111[13].pdf (15.9K)
You can stop calling the 1st Norwegian tests a "negative" result. Be more accurate and call them what they are - a weak positive. Download Report 021111.pdf (22.0K) You can't wave a magic wand and make black white.
That's ridiculous rhetoric. Dr. Marty tests samples, he's not risking anything. Alexandra Morton and her activists are so myopic that they can't even separate between the farmers who they assert are causing the damage, and the professionals who diagnose samples in a lab. Ridiculous.I want to see Dr. Gary's Marty's PCR results. Don't just tell us he tested 5000 fish and got a negative, you need to tell us what segment and what probe, we need details because you are risking our fish with your actions.
This is simple bureaucratic nonsense. I've filled out these import certificates before. Not all hatcheries will have been approved, but there are mechanisms in place. The hatchery in question had detailed health summaries of their broodstock and their progeny, they had secure water sources, and had not imported new stock to their hatchery in over 5 years. They met all the conditions, except for the red tape of government regulations which by no means should be taken as a guarantee.As for Dr. Laura Richards, she personally petitioned to waive the Canadian Fish Health Protection Regulations in 2004 so Atlantic salmon eggs could pour in from an unapproved hatchery. That is why her words are meaningless to me. Download 2004 Fish Health1[1].pdf (2176.3K)
This is patently false. ISAv is a reportable disease...There is very good reason for BC having no ISA contamination...there have been no disease outbreaks in the farms. ISA is lethal, highly lethal. 90% of all fish will die lethal. That hasn't happened.There is no reason BC would not have been contaminated by ISAv. Your department left the door wide open! You did not include ISAv on the hatchery import forms, likely because no one can actually sign a document saying there is no ISAv in Atlantic salmon eggs - the virus is that widespread. Your department did not even make ISAv a reportable disease in salmon farms, even as the same companies as use BC waters triggered a massive ISAv epidemic in Chile. This is unconscionable.
Rhetoric. More rhetoric.Shame on you. As we face grave uncertainty over introduction of the most lethal salmon virus known, you give the salmon farming industry a million dollars to go to trade shows so they can peddle their wares while we pay for the consequences.
Not supported by her so called facts. Reaching rhetoric.In my opinion, Mr. Ashfield you, predecessors and key members of your department belong in court for reckless behaviour risking the most generous gift the people of British Columbia receive every year. You are not here to see communities of people, whales, eagles, bears come to life when the salmon come home. They are much too valuable to be risked by vacuous statements by the likes of you. Either stand up strong and fight for our fish or step down Mr. Ashfield.
Here I actually agree. There should be more money for DFO.Hundreds of British Columbians go into the rivers every year to fight for the wild salmon. We work for the wild salmon because we understand their value and we are not going to let you take this away from us. As hundreds of thousands of sockeye salmon died every year in the Fraser River, before spawning, your department would not give your own scientists the money to find out why and when they came up with a very strong theory you starved them further for funds and locked their voices away from the media. And yet you throw money to the foreign owned salmon feedlot industry.
More slander.Please resign and take your senior Pacific Region staff with you. Remove the Pacific Biological Station from political clutches so that they can do the work that needs to be done. We need some people at the helm who want wild salmon to survive and you sir have shown no such ability. Step away from our fish.
She has a Bachelor of Science. She's no more a Dr. than I am...Dr. Alexandra Morton
Just what I expect form you/yours.
Nothing is showing-all of a piece with the pathetic science you long to believe in.Here's a nice picture showing the difference between the activists simplified view of science, versus reality.
Nothing is showing
Can we all agree that raising a salmon from the other side of the country,a different ocean and a species foreign to the pacific ocean and raise them in a confined area and treat them with drugs not to mention coloring there food to make a pinker flesh is going to have serious negative effects on the environment they are raised in?
If you're incapable of hotlinking a simple picture how thorough are your experiments?Except your ignorance, and Morton's intellectual bankruptcy....
Canadians shouldn't have to prove that money hungry corporations (and their paid shills who have money as their god) that have devastated Salmon runs in Norway, Scotland and Ireland won't do the same here.No. Define serious, and give evidence, then we'll talk.
And wild fish stocks around the world are collapsing. If people want sea food in the future, they will either have to accept that it's going to be very expensive, or that consumption will have to decrease, or that aquaculture will have to fill the role. Theirs no getting around that.
You don't know what you're talking about with fish feed. Fish feeds are formulated diets, and the farmed fish are actually more efficient consumers of their feed. So if you're looking at ocean carrying capacity, and how much food can be produced, aquaculture will allow us to feed more people on the same amount of resources.
Where did the farmed salmon get the sea lice from? Wild fish.
Thank you bill barilko, I could not have said it better myself.
Ask a fisherman in any of those countries the negative results from farmed fish.
In Alaska, where I fish we do not have the evil spawn of farmed salmon,unless they escape from a net in BC and we are blessed with a superior management system that prevents over fishing. Unlike the country I am a proud citizen of and would die for ,Canada.{the tattoos on my back prove it and my passport} the management system failed, the fisherman tried to catch the last fish and almost succeeded and farm salmon was welcomed into BC by the government to make up for jobs lost in fishing industry and for tax dollars to feed the machine.
My argument is simple. When you mess with mother nature you are left with an inferior product and problems to the environment.
The net pen apologists all speak from the same script/speak with the same drooling mendacious mumble.
Stick with your studies and you too can learn to parrot the biostitute line.Go to university and you can learn professional science too!
Can we all agree that raising a salmon from the other side of the country,a different ocean and a species foreign to the pacific ocean and raise them in a confined area and treat them with drugs not to mention coloring there food to make a pinker flesh is going to have serious negative effects on the environment they are raised in?