Don't forget to check twice under your bed for one of those damn profiteering corporate bogeymen.
They always hide under the bed.... Always
They always hide under the bed.... Always
Like I said: Intelligent conversation. :roll:Don't forget to check twice under your bed for one of those damn profiteering corporate bogeymen.
They always hide under the bed.... Always
He's just aggravating himself anyway.
So we can put more taxpayer $ into general revenue . Who will this help and how will it save the world ?The hypocrisy argument only strengthens the fact that there needs to be carbon pricing.
So we can put more taxpayer $ into general revenue . Who will this help and how will it save the world ?
Isn't the general idea of carbon taxing to get the industrial sector to make the connection between pollution and financial costs? Doesn't there come a point where cleaning up their act is cheaper than paying the carbon tax?
That's not strictly true. Companies can also decide to take the additional cost out of profits, basing the decision on their calculation of what passing on the cost to consumers (i.e., raising prices) will do to sales.Whatever the cost, it will be passed on to the consumer so there is no cost to them. There is also no incentive to them to change anything.
The hypocrisy argument only strengthens the fact that there needs to be carbon pricing.
Isn't the general idea of carbon taxing to get the industrial sector to make the connection between pollution and financial costs? Doesn't there come a point where cleaning up their act is cheaper than paying the carbon tax?
You're slowly being poisoned by water fluoridation too, but I rarely see anyone get themselves worked up about it.Interpret as you like if you're not into reasonable discussion. I don't see much difference between a fast fire and slowly being poisoned by oil in the groundwater from a leaky old pipe - but neither really matter in the pursuit of profit
The hypocrisy argument only strengthens the fact that there needs to be carbon pricing.
That's not strictly true. Companies can also decide to take the additional cost out of profits, basing the decision on their calculation of what passing on the cost to consumers (i.e., raising prices) will do to sales.
Keep telling yourself that.No it only proves carbon pricing is a scam. Carbon is already priced in Canada. It is just called royalties, everything else is just taxes.
It has already been proven that raising the price of fuel does nothing to cut consumption.
He's not wrong. 30 years ago the Brits were paying around $5/gallon. Today they're paying more like $10/gallon. Hasn't cut the traffic down any.Keep telling yourself that.
Keep telling yourself that.