Ad hominem is a poor argument.I see you're an illiterate idiot, but that's not new.
Ad hominem is a poor argument.I see you're an illiterate idiot, but that's not new.
Ad hominem is a poor argument.
Johnson is the real PM because he is leader of the party with the most seats in the parliament. That's it.And you're the king of ad hominem, what's your point?
Seriously, what's with your ignorance to what's being said. Why is it so hard for you to get that?
Yes, he's PM.
Yes, he was chosen such by his party a la the Westminster System.
But, for the third time, Blackie said he was elected PM which he wasn't. He was selected to be leader of his party, which makes him automatically the PM. To be the REAL PM of Britain, he needs to be elected in a general election. Right now, he's just the guy in the hot seat until the next election. And before you or Blackie or anyone else says something, this is my stance no matter what party is in charge.
Is that dumbed down enough for you yet or does it need to go simpler?
He was elected - BY HIS PARTY - to be the party leader and PM.
That does NOT mean he was elected PM by the general public of Britain. THAT title goes to May, who resigned.
Until BoJo decides to hold a general election, and wins it, he's only PM because a select portion of the public, voted for his party, and their party selected him. And if you think that means the public had anything to do with it you have NO understanding of politics what so ever. Once in power, the actual will of the people becomes a commodity to be forgotten when it suits the politician.
BoJo......he is. Rather fitting..He was elected - BY HIS PARTY - to be the party leader and PM.
That does NOT mean he was elected PM by the general public of Britain. THAT title goes to May, who resigned.
Until BoJo decides to hold a general election, and wins it, he's only PM because a select portion of the public, voted for his party, and their party selected him. And if you think that means the public had anything to do with it you have NO understanding of politics what so ever. Once in power, the actual will of the people becomes a commodity to be forgotten when it suits the politician.
Yeah ... cronies are public, too.I would say the party members who elected him are the general public.
I find it rather odd all these people suddenly railing against the political system that Britain has had for a long time and Canada has had probably ever since it was founded.
It's like they've only just realised.
If the party in power elects a Prime Minister as your Tories have just done in Canada or anywhere else, they seek a fresh mandate from the voting general public within a short period. May did it, even. Boris likely will do no such thing, as he rightly fears that the Tories will come in third and the Boris will have to re-join the circus to earn a living.
I don't know why I bother because clearly, you are not "up to" getting it.
Broon was rightly reviled by the end.Brown didn't do it.
He was elected Labour leader on 24th June 2017 and therefore became PM three days later.
He didn't face a General Election until three years later - which he lost. I don't recall there being much hoop-la about that.
Or maybe it's only PMs significantly to the right of Lefty socialists like Brown who aren't allowed to abide by Britain's centuries-old Westminster system.
Broon was rightly reviled by the end.
I remember a Labour massacre when he finally got around to it and they still haven't recovered.I don't recall there being an uproar that he never held an election. It was three years after he became PM that he faced an election, but even then he didn't call it. It had to be held either in 2009 or 2010 according to the then laws - the Tory/Lib Dem Coalition government later brought in new ones - but Brown couldn't bring himself to hold it in 2009 so opted for 2010 instead. But I don't recall any uproar.
Now, in the merely 5 days that Boris Johnson has been PM, numpties are saying he must hold an election soon which is a rather weird thing to say when, according to Britain's democratic system, the next election doesn't have to be held until 5th May 2022 at the latest.
I find it rather odd all these people suddenly railing against the political system that Britain has had for a long time and Canada has had probably ever since it was founded.
It's like they've only just realised.
So what kind of a PM will he make?? He does have an oversized personality......... will that personality overshadow any real policies he will try to make?? what are his strengths and what are his shortcomings??
It's not 'sudden' for me.
I've ALWAYS had this issue.
But then I also don't like how the leadership/PM is selected in Canada.
As for your 'example' of Brown, he was PM only because his party selected him. He kept that position until he was ousted in a General Election, but IMO that election should have been called MUCH earlier than three years. If he wanted to be the legitimate PM for all of Britain and not just by virtue of his winning the "Who's more liked" contest that is the leadership race, he should have called for a general election.
Any time Canada has gotten a PM by this model, I have not considered them the real PM of ALL Canada, they're PM because they won the party's popularity contest.
John Oliver did a good piece on him last night. I think BoJo is f'ed.