Joe Biden, I Always Say What I Mean

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA

LMAO. Another piece of EAO propaganda. Your article states CNN said Biden won 66% to 34%.

Yet on CNN they have Ryan over Biden 48% to 44%... although they called it a draw. Here is some math...

48>44

Biden, Ryan in combative exchange, but call it a draw - CNN.com


Face it... Biden lost.

YOU FAIL!
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
And yet Biden beat Ryan in their debate.

"That's A Bunch of Malarky", now come back to reality..

Being rude, obnoxious and arrogant does not qualify for a win.. Biden's depends were a little to tight cutting circulation to his brain..

VIDEO: Biden's Rude Interruption: "That's A Bunch of Malarky" - Political News Video

....

Face it... Biden lost.

YOU FAIL!

In less than 30 days they (Liberal nut bars) will experience the ultimate failure, when Obama is a one term President and Romney is elected.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
It is a dead heat if you factor in the margin of error.
Which could mean 53 to 39 as well. I suspect if the numbers were reversed they would be calling it a Biden win and not a dead heat.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
I don't mind CNN, but they certainly focused on one side of the +/- scale, as if the 4% reporting difference didn't exist.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
10 Reasons Why Biden Lost Big




  1. Biden actually argued that we “don’t need to worry” about Iran. Why? Because they don’t have a weapon yet. Ryan’s position: do not let Iran get a nuke.
  2. Biden’s Middle East position, “We’re getting out in 2014. Period.” Ryan wants to make sure our gains are not in vain. Military agrees with Ryan, not Biden.
  3. Biden interrupted unlike any presidential debate I’ve seen in my lifetime. Like, ever. I was embarrassed.
  4. Biden smirked at every point Ryan made. Most people will let a few go, but Biden’s was every single point.
  5. Biden specifically called out “the republicans” and Palin, alienating nearly half the electorate. Bad move. Ryan never once grouped entire voting classes together, which is exactly what both candidates needed to do.
  6. Biden got one laughter from the audience, and it was an ad hominem (“Oh, you’re Jack Kennedy now?). Ryan got three, and they were genuinely funny, one in a response to the 47% illegally-obtained video of Romney. Ryan made Biden’s gaffes the rebuttal.
  7. Biden drilled down too deeply in numbers; it was confusing and suspicious. Ryan rhetorically brought light to several jumbled topics. “This can get a little confusing let me explain,” which is a great debate technique.
  8. Biden was straight up on his views on Abortion. That’s good; if you’re pro-life, vote for Ryan. Paul Ryan’s story of Bean was precious and heartwarming. Go women’s vote.
  9. Biden’s verbals were just as bad as non-verbals. “Malarke”? Ryan was cool and collected. A bit overly polite, actually, but he didn’t lose it.
  10. Biden contradicted the State Department’s findings about intelligence reports from Libya, then used intelligence reports as a defense for making original claims. That’ll be all over the news tomorrow.
Ryan won on the debate, but his campaign won overall. Romney and Ryan are ahead in the polls, and Ryan needed to keep that momentum going. He did that quite well. He didn’t need to out-perform Romney’s debate from last week. Essentially, Ryan’s main goal was to not lose.
Biden lost because he needed to win, and win big. Obama got clocked last week. Biden overplayed his cards and tried to appease the base, not independents. Obama got a significant number of Republicans in 2008, but they are less likely to vote for him now. Biden’s main goal was to win. He clearly lost.


[youtube]j3roG09O6T4[/youtube]
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Biden is as wacked as Trump, he's just not as funny with the antics and shenanigans.
Michael Bloomberg isn't, though and he may very likely push Biden right off the stage.

Who's Trump going to hire to investigate Bloomberg? North Korea? Communist China? The Russians, again?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Well, if he wanted a forgone conclusion that was completely false he'ed hire you.
;)



you know the drill...
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Must be that damn boomarang effect, interesting

Graham requests Biden-Ukraine records from State Department

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) requested records from the State Department related to former Vice President Joe Biden’s efforts to oust a Ukrainian prosecutor in 2016 on Thursday.
The letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo comes as Republicans seek to train scrutiny on Biden’s actions in Ukraine amid impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump over his own efforts to pressure Ukraine’s government to investigate his would-be rival for the White House.
Graham is seeking records related to phone calls that occurred in February and March 2016 between Biden and Ukraine’s then-president, Petro Poroshenko, regarding U.S. demands that the country fire its top prosecutor. The prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, was unpopular with Western leaders, who viewed him as corrupt, and Biden was representing official U.S. policy and that of allied governments.
At the time, Biden’s son, Hunter, held a lucrative board position with Burisma holdings, a Ukrainian gas company. Burisma, and its owner, Mykola Zlochesky, had faced investigative scrutiny from Shokin’s office, presenting a potential conflict of interest for Biden.
Biden’s side has said that investigations into Burisma were long dormant by the time he secured Shokin’s firing in late March 2016. On Thursday, a key witness in the impeachment probe, U.S. Embassy Kyiv official David Holmes, said the same during his testimony.
But in February 2016, Shokin’s office seized Zlochevsky’s property as part of a corruption investigation, according to a report from the time from the news service Interfax-Ukraine.
Graham’s letter notes that Hunter Biden began following Tony Blinken, a longtime Biden aide then serving as deputy secretary of state, on the day of the Interfax report and suggests the two may have discussed Shokin’s investigations. Neither the State Department, Blinken nor the Biden campaign immediately responded to a request for comment.
The letter from Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, seeks all communications between Biden’s office and Poroshenko’s office between the news of the raid and Shokin’s March 29 firing.
It also seeks records related to a meeting between another Burisma board member, Devon Archer, and then-Secretary of State John Kerry on March 2, 2016.
Archer, a business partner of Hunter Biden’s, was also a close friend and business partner of Kerry’s stepson, Christopher Heinz.
News of the Archer-Kerry meeting, as well as Hunter Biden’s Twitter follow of Blinken were first reported by the conservative journalist John Solomon based on State Department documents he obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request.
Despite the letter and their partisan differences, Graham and Biden have a history of warm relations. Graham became visibly emotional when talking about his former Senate colleague in 2015.
“He’s the nicest person I think I’ve ever met in public life.” Graham said at the time. “He is as good a man as God ever created.”
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Biden is as wacked as Trump, he's just not as funny with the antics and shenanigans.
Everyone knows it. He's the Democrat Trump. Nothing he does surprises or upsets his base.

I think that's why trump is so fixated on him