JK Rowling supports Trump's Executive Order on Two Sexes
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
They don't owe anything to Joman.
They support trans people; they've been pretty even handed when asked about what Joman has said.
It's Joman that likes to, you know, attack people... over and over... until she gets sued...
What I find funny is Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson poncing about in identical dresses, pretending Daniel isn't trans.
PFT! What about Emma Watson poncing about in identical suits pretending Emma isn't trans???
And if they're male, they gotta wear overhauls and plaid shirts to work. And if they're female, they gotta wear gingham dresses and stock up on pregnancy gingham dresses.
Your inability to distinguish between sex (a biological fact) and gender (a social construct) is kinda pathetic.
SO, if they don't know themselves, why the push to irreversibly damage their bodies? This just proves that there is no need to do anything until they reach legal age and can both decide what they want and earn the money for whatever self inflicted damage they want to do to their bodies.
Not even that. Their parents are free to pay for their surgery after they turn 18.
I have to agree with the soi-disant conservatives here. We don't allow children to make life-altering decisions until they become adults (currently at 18).
I do have a question for all the people braying "Parental rahts!" though. If parents can unilaterally forbid sex-change operations, can they also unilaterally require sex-change operations?
When did I ever say that?
Why do you lie? Is your position so weak that you have to lie to prop it up?
BTW, you also kinda suck at it.
"Right there" was nothing of the sort.
I'm beginning to get an answer to my "Why do you lie?" question.
You, on the other hand, are an expert in shit.
Not surprising for somebody who spends his days with his head up his ass.
You'd best look into the roots of gender as a social construct. What is based on? Whose work? Who was studied?
Tell me everything you know about Alfred Kinsey and John Money.
Yes, dear. There were no transgenders, homosexuals, or any other deviance from he-in' and she-in' until the eee-vil gol-dang Libruls created them to hurt the feelings of Real Canadians.
There is no push for that.
What IS happening is - kids are being - under best practices - told to social transition first, which is name changes, pronoun and appearance changes. IF a parent agrees, they COULD be put on blockers - which are used on kids and adults to help deal with hormone issues - which will pause their puberty UNTIL they figure out if they want to continue on with it or take the proper hormones according to the gender they are.
As you and others are told, repeatedly, blockers used to help trans kids are off label blockers ALREADY used on kids younger than trans kids to help THEIR hormone issues and y'all seem fine with THAT. Actually, in Alberta's new push for guidelines, it's actually listed as the 'only reason to use blockers on kids', WHICH absolutely destroys the "irreversible damage" freak out anti-trans people have.
It just proves you and all the other anti-trans people don't pay attention at all. Or even just give a shit.
It's all excuses to push your bigotry/hate onto kids who are trying to figure themselves out.