Jagmeet Singh is a hypocrite

[AMKiller]

Multiculturalism is fine until it affects the rights of other people. If its people’s culture to have pet dogs, that is fine from Canada’s perspective, but allowing those dogs to harm or annoy other people is wrong. Your rights end where mine begin. A dog licking someone without their permission means the dog’s owner has to be held liable, simple as that.

If people want to sunbathe wearing practically nothing that is their problem. Our culture and religion obviously doesn’t allow for such a shameless display. We religious people avoid beaches and places like this. I remember reading a few years ago that in Montreal there was a YMCA next to a Jewish yeshiva. The YMCA had women wearing practically nothing exercising as is part of your culture. The Jewish yeshiva requested the YMCA to ‘frost’ their windows and YMCA did so out of respect for the Jewish community’s sentiments.

[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Nobody wants their dog to harm or annoy other people, you stupid Jihadists.

you say you don't judge but now your calling women in bathing suits shameless. Lol.

I would have told the Jews or Muslims or Christians to piss off and move somewhere else if my right to exercise as I pleased offended them.

Religion is always looking to control people. Religion is fascism and Islam is the Nazism.

 

[10larry]

Zulfiqar gave me a -1 thumbs down for commenting on the alien infestation that prompted me to get out of Brampton ....
BS however thank you for eliquently explaining why me and my family got the h_ll out of Brampton, zero attempt by immigrants to assimilate whatsoever rather a concerted effort to foist their crap on this town. Good to know singh is your choice to advance dark ages culture on ontarians, always utile to know whom to oppose vigorously.
Normally I rue over an unfavourable rating but in this case I feel pretty good about it, oddly even more so when I pet my neighbours dog.

 

[AMKiller]

Zulfiqar gave me a -1 thumbs down for commenting on the alien infestation that prompted me to get out of Brampton ....
BS however thank you for eliquently explaining why me and my family got the h_ll out of Brampton, zero attempt by immigrants to assimilate whatsoever rather a concerted effort to foist their crap on this town. Good to know singh is your choice to advance dark ages culture on ontarians, always utile to know whom to oppose vigorously.
Normally I rue over an unfavourable rating but in this case I feel pretty good about it, oddly even more so when I pet my neighbours dog.

Zulf has given me bad ratings also. That's a sign I'm telling the truth. Thanks Zulf.

 

[Bar Sinister]

I'd say they all have some aspect of multiculturalism. But having a taste of this and a taste of that doesn't make a city multicultural as Zul explained. And seriously... what is traditional?

But seriously, gentrifying and keeping the Chinese take out or Indian restaurant is hardly multicultural.

I'm not sure why you always fixate on the food aspect of multiculturalism It has dozens of other aspects including music, television, art, architecture, literature, technology, and language. Somehow you seem to think that downplaying the importance of food cancels out all the rest. In fact Canadians use so many different multicultural practices on a daily basis they probably don't even think about where they came from, if they even know.

Not at all. I am Muslim first and Muslim last. I have no other identity. I am South Asian ethnically but don’t consider that as a basis for my identity, only as a basis for my political interests in Canada as part of that ethnic community.


The issue of dogs isn’t a South Asian one. As far as I know Hindus and Sikhs have no issue with dogs, though culturally we South Asians don’t keep them in our homes as pets. In Islam, dogs are ritually impure, so their saliva or sweat are defiling. Hence there should be laws implemented to protect the sentiments of the Muslim community that dogs must be on leashes at all times in the public or if they are to be unleashed it must not be done in public parks but in designated areas only.

That reminds me of a couple of young Muslims I ran into at the off-leash dog park. They were there looking at the dogs because their parents viewed dogs as unclean and would not let them have one as a pet. I'm betting that is one nonsensical belief they are going to ignore as soon as they are adults. As I said before; immigrants who come to Canada turn into Canadians - Muslims are no exception. That is why we have Muslims in Canada who own dogs, play hockey, and eat bacon.
[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

The caste system still exists.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/02/23/asia/india-caste-system/index.html

Didn't read my post did you? I stated that the caste system is illegal. There is nothing to stop people from practicing it they wish, but they can no longer force it on those who wish to ignore it. That is why Indians in Canada frequently marry outside their culture and why even in India about five percent of marriages are inter-caste marriages. That is a number that will almost certainly goes up as India continues to modernize and people of all sorts of castes and sub-castes are mixed together.

 

[ZulFiqar786]

That is why we have Muslims in Canada who own dogs, play hockey, and eat bacon.
.

Any so-called ‘Muslim’ that thinks its okay to eat bacon is no longer a Muslim by definition.

 

[DaSleeper]

13 Reasons Muslim Terrorists Commit Suicide from Planck's Constant

 

[JLM]

Is Jag Singh going anywhere where he will be a threat to anyone?

 

[ZulFiqar786]

Nathan Cullen, NDP MP from BC, just endorsed Jagmeet Singh for the leadership. Singh is making impressive gains in terms of endorsements. He signed up the most new members. He is on track to becoming leader in a single round of voting and will be announced leader by October 1st.

 

[10larry]

Any so-called ‘Muslim’ that thinks its okay to eat bacon is no longer a Muslim by definition.

The perfect example of current immigrant resistance, post wwII dps were only too happy to accept and adapt to our quirky ways that were oft inconsistant with their past, they appreciated our helping hand, a new beginning means leaving baggage behind. Todays immigrant is not seeking refuge rather seeking to foist their mores upon their host, religion here is loosing favour as more and more folks accept icon worship for the myth that it is even as muslims continue their mission. Faith has a place as in offering solace to the grieving however in real world terms it holds no authority over canines or their fans.
Why folks leave a place where they're comfortable and migrate to a land where folks luv bacon and pooper scoop confounds.

 

[Twin_Moose]

Multiculturalism is fine until it affects the rights of other people. If its people’s culture to have pet dogs, that is fine from Canada’s perspective, but allowing those dogs to harm or annoy other people is wrong. Your rights end where mine begin. A dog licking someone without their permission means the dog’s owner has to be held liable, simple as that.

If people want to sunbathe wearing practically nothing that is their problem. Our culture and religion obviously doesn’t allow for such a shameless display. We religious people avoid beaches and places like this. I remember reading a few years ago that in Montreal there was a YMCA next to a Jewish yeshiva. The YMCA had women wearing practically nothing exercising as is part of your culture. The Jewish yeshiva requested the YMCA to ‘frost’ their windows and YMCA did so out of respect for the Jewish community’s sentiments.

[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Your rights end when it is in conflict to the majority/common good, also your rights end when you enter a posted property that warn you of possibility of harm to you, you have the right not to enter an area that may harm you.

 

[AMKiller]

Any so-called ‘Muslim’ that thinks its okay to eat bacon is no longer a Muslim by definition.

Why do you get to define what and who a Muslim is? Why are you imposing your opinion onto others?

 

[ZulFiqar786]

Your rights end when it is in conflict to the majority/common good, also your rights end when you enter a posted property that warn you of possibility of harm to you, you have the right not to enter an area that may harm you.

Public parks are no one’s property. In public it must be a law that dogs are kept on leashes. Dogs can only be unleashed on private property or in designated areas like “dog-parks”.

The perfect example of current immigrant resistance, post wwII dps were only too happy to accept and adapt to our quirky ways that were oft inconsistant with their past, they appreciated our helping hand, a new beginning means leaving baggage behind. Todays immigrant is not seeking refuge rather seeking to foist their mores upon their host, religion here is loosing favour as more and more folks accept icon worship for the myth that it is even as muslims continue their mission. Faith has a place as in offering solace to the grieving however in real world terms it holds no authority over canines or their fans.
Why folks leave a place where they're comfortable and migrate to a land where folks luv bacon and pooper scoop confounds.

European immigrants have more or less the same culture. Canada’s policy of multiculturalism is to ensure that non-Europeans are not pressured to assimilate into the predominant European culture of the European White majority. Not eating bacon isn’t merely a cultural issue but a religious one for both Muslims and Jews. Freedom of religion is an essential article of free and liberal societies, and thankfully it is protected by the constitution and the Charter. Dietary habits are everyone’s personal business. People should be free to be vegetarians, vegans, eat only Kosher or eat only Halal, etc. Muslims like me only frequent Halal restaurants and buy only Halal products from the supermarket. We have strict guidelines about food. I would never eat at a “conventional” restaurant even if it was a vegetarian dish because those restaurants don’t separate their utensils, i.e. they cook their vegetarian dishes in the same utensils they cook non-vegetarian non-Halal dishes. In our religion we are not allowed to eat from utensils used by non-Muslims unless they have been thoroughly washed. If a non-Muslim invited me to his house for dinner I would politely decline.

 

[AMKiller]

Public parks are no one’s property. In public it must be a law that dogs are kept on leashes. Dogs can only be unleashed on private property or in designated areas like “dog-parks”.






European immigrants have more or less the same culture. Canada’s policy of multiculturalism is to ensure that non-Europeans are not pressured to assimilate into the predominant European culture of the European White majority. Not eating bacon isn’t merely a cultural issue but a religious one for both Muslims and Jews. Freedom of religion is an essential article of free and liberal societies, and thankfully it is protected by the constitution and the Charter. Dietary habits are everyone’s personal business. People should be free to be vegetarians, vegans, eat only Kosher or eat only Halal, etc. Muslims like me only frequent Halal restaurants and buy only Halal products from the supermarket. We have strict guidelines about food. I would never eat at a “conventional” restaurant even if it was a vegetarian dish because those restaurants don’t separate their utensils, i.e. they cook their vegetarian dishes in the same utensils they cook non-vegetarian non-Halal dishes. In our religion we are not allowed to eat from utensils used by non-Muslims unless they have been thoroughly washed. If a non-Muslim invited me to his house for dinner I would politely decline.

Don't worry, no non-Muslim in their right mind would invite a Jihadist for dinner.

There are such places as leash-free parks, you have the right not to go in these parks.

Jews have assimilated quite well into Western culture, as have all other religions. Only Muslims don't feel the need to assimilate so I question why would you be here if everything we do is offensive to you?

 

[EagleSmack]

Multiculturalism is fine until it affects the rights of other people.

But what annoys someone is not necessarily a right. People letting their dog run about does not affect your rights.

If its people’s culture to have pet dogs, that is fine from Canada’s perspective, but allowing those dogs to harm or annoy other people is wrong.

Harm yes... annoy ... No

Your rights end where mine begin.

And there you have it folks.

A dog licking someone without their permission means the dog’s owner has to be held liable, simple as that.

Well according to you. Most likely a Canadian would just smile and say "Sorry" at your annoyance.

If people want to sunbathe wearing practically nothing that is their problem. Our culture and religion obviously doesn’t allow for such a shameless display. We religious people avoid beaches and places like this.

Again, you aren't being multicultural.

I remember reading a few years ago that in Montreal there was a YMCA next to a Jewish yeshiva. The YMCA had women wearing practically nothing exercising as is part of your culture. The Jewish yeshiva requested the YMCA to ‘frost’ their windows and YMCA did so out of respect for the Jewish community’s sentiments.

Sure, the YMCA is not a government institution and it did not matter to them about frosting the windows. Good for them. The thing is, the YMCA could have said no. There would be nothing that the Jewish folks could have done about it if the YMCA refused.

 

[ZulFiqar786]

A dog licking someone without their permission is harm, just as spitting on someone is considered assault. The only difference is the dog’s owner is liable for the assault due to negligence (not keeping dog on a leash). Simple logic.

 

[EagleSmack]

I'm not sure why you always fixate on the food aspect of multiculturalism It has dozens of other aspects including music, television, art, architecture, literature, technology, and language. Somehow you seem to think that downplaying the importance of food cancels out all the rest. In fact Canadians use so many different multicultural practices on a daily basis they probably don't even think about where they came from, if they even know.

Damn... that went right over your head! lol

Are you unaware of the multiple uses of the word taste?

So it seems your OK with gentrification providing people are in tune with different cultures.

A dog licking someone without their permission is harm, just as spitting on someone is considered assault. The only difference is the dog’s owner is liable for the assault due to negligence (not keeping dog on a leash). Simple logic.

Actually no... to our culture it is not logical. If you were to call the Police on a dog owner because his/her dog licked you they would laugh.

You must learn to accept other cultures.

 

[AMKiller]

A dog licking someone without their permission is harm, just as spitting on someone is considered assault. The only difference is the dog’s owner is liable for the assault due to negligence (not keeping dog on a leash). Simple logic.

You rave about multiculturalism yet you judge and belittle most Canadians that practice their own culture.

A dog licking you is not harm, mental midget, wash yourself. Besides, dogs don't like the taste of Jihadist scumbags.

Stop stepping on other's people's rights and free expression. You don't like it go back from whence you came.

Try telling a cop you were assaulted by a dog lick and he'll laugh in your face.

Multiculturalism is fine until it affects the rights of other people. If its people’s culture to have pet dogs, that is fine from Canada’s perspective, but allowing those dogs to harm or annoy other people is wrong. Your rights end where mine begin. A dog licking someone without their permission means the dog’s owner has to be held liable, simple as that.

If people want to sunbathe wearing practically nothing that is their problem. Our culture and religion obviously doesn’t allow for such a shameless display. We religious people avoid beaches and places like this. I remember reading a few years ago that in Montreal there was a YMCA next to a Jewish yeshiva. The YMCA had women wearing practically nothing exercising as is part of your culture. The Jewish yeshiva requested the YMCA to ‘frost’ their windows and YMCA did so out of respect for the Jewish community’s sentiments.

[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

If my rights end where yours begin then your rights end where mine begin. Right?

When I see women in shower curtains walking around in 30 degree weather it offends me, thus by your logic, they should stop walking around in public spaces dressed like that.

 

[spilledthebeer]

You rave about multiculturalism yet you judge and belittle most Canadians that practice their own culture.

A dog licking you is not harm, mental midget, wash yourself. Besides, dogs don't like the taste of Jihadist scumbags.

Stop stepping on other's people's rights and free expression. You don't like it go back from whence you came.

Try telling a cop you were assaulted by a dog lick and he'll laugh in your face.


If my rights end where yours begin then your rights end where mine begin. Right?

When I see women in shower curtains walking around in 30 degree weather it offends me, thus by your logic, they should stop walking around in public spaces dressed like that.

JAGMEET SINGH-CLASSIC HYPOCRITE!!!!!! Consider this:



Here is an article illustrating how craven and cowardly and how desperate our political `leaders` are to get elected at any price. With some comments of my own in brackets):

NDP leadership hopeful Jagmeet Singh selective when protecting freedom of speech

Sue-Ann Levy BY SUE-ANN LEVY, TORONTO SUN
FIRST POSTED: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 07:09 PM EDT | UPDATED: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 07:18 PM EDT

I didn’t know whether to laugh at the sheer gall of would-be federal NDP leader Jagmeet Singh or to cry at how easily the oppression handwringers rushed to condemn someone as racist for merely expressing her right to free speech.

I’m talking about the woman, Jennifer Bush, who attended a recent Singh meet-and-greet where she dared question him about his support of Sharia law and M-103, the controversial federal motion passed in late March which condemns Islamophobia and all forms of systematic racism.

(Gosh! A WOMAN who is worried that she will become a second class citizen just as soon as LIE-berals and their less intelligent cousins of NDP import enough Muslim voters, wants to know about the Singh stand on Sharia Law- the Muslim dictatorship that will prevent a woman from even leaving the house without male permission AND a suitable male escort! WHY would she be worried?)

Subsequent to that, Singh posted a response on social media that included these gems:

“I didn’t answer the question (meaning Jen Bush’s question) because my response to Islamophobia has always been ... that ‘hate is wrong’.”

(So he is using the same key word- Islamophobia- as any hypocrite LIE-beral would do- to denigrate and insult any person who fears more Muslim terror!)

His response gets even better: “Once we say it’s OK to hate someone based on their religion, we’re also opening the door to hate based on race, gender, sexuality and more ... it’s important that we stand united against all forms of hate.”

I repeat: Singh said “it’s important that we stand united against all forms of hate.”

(The response by Singh and LIE-berals to so called islamophobia is reverse racist in the extreme! We do not HATE bank robbers but we do not let them roam freely in our society either! And we do not hate drug addicts but we do not loan them our car or credit cards either! And we jail serial killers who have the blood of multiple victims on their hands- just like Muslim terrorists!)

I frankly don’t care whether Singh is Sikh or Muslim. What I do care about is his highly selective definition of hate and his double standard when it comes to free speech.

(I say that selective and ill defined Islamophobia definition of hate- which puts forward strong preference for dangerous immigration policies- is poison! I have said before that LIE-berals seem hell bent on using anti Islamophobia laws to silence any critic of their policies- no matter how logical or valid is that critical complaint- and NDP has now joined the ranks of reverse racists! Reason and logic are being trashed by desperate Ndp and LIE-beral politicians who view getting elected as being a far more important goal than managing our national security and our economy in any sensible fashion!)

Evidently the deputy leader of the Ontario NDP didn’t feel the least bit compelled last December to “stand united” with all members of the Ontario legislature against the hateful Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

Singh was not only one of the few MPPs to vote against Motion 36, which rejected the differential treatment of Israel, including the BDS movement.

(The sad reality is that our chattering classes are condemning the ONLY genuine democracy in the middle east by sneering at Israel!)

He also spoke out against the motion, using the predictable weasel words employed by the left (particularly politicians on the left) that any such motion would impact on the “free expression of dissent.”

(Our anointed leaders see that votes may be won from catering to the growing numbers of Muslims in Canada by smearing Israel but they do their bigotry in a sneaky way to avoid being labeled as bigoted against Jews- just another little bit of duplicity from our two faced `leaders`!)


Well hello! Mr. Singh, what do you think M-103 is all about and what do you think you’ve done in the past few days by reducing Bush’s legitimate questions to “hateful and Islamophobic” comments — a depiction absolutely lapped up by the left-wing media?

(The LIE-beral —103 motion is on the way to becoming law- which will silence anybody who wants to talk about Muslim terror- no matter the validity!)

That notwithstanding, BDS — which selectively targets Israel with economic sanctions and boycotts — is nothing more than anti-Semitism and intolerance towards Jews shrouded in the guise of the criticism of Israel, the Jewish state.

(Certainly the largest number of hate crimes committed in Canada in recent years has been against Jewish citizens and one may honestly ask if much of that hate is being generated by our newly arrived Muslim `Cdns`? One crime that WAS proven and an arrest made, occurred some years back in Montreal- in which a `new Cdn` from Iran burned down a Jewish school. And what of the recent `hate crime` in Oshawa- in which a Muslim complained to cops that he was targeted and assaulted by a white guy- and the charges were later dropped as the Muslim apparently made up his complaint! Muslims understand the politics of LIE-beral bigotry as well as anybody and they have recognized that making a mountain out of a mole hill will bring political support from craven Cdn politicians seeking to BUY support at any price!)

Toronto’s Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre recognizes that as does B’nai Brith, as did most of those who voted in favour of MPP Gila Martow’s motion last December.

Evidently, Singh’s call to be “united against hate” didn’t apply, either, last summer when he sponsored a press conference in the Queen’s Park media studio held by assorted anti-Israel activists and 9/11 Truthers in support of Mississauga Catholic teacher Nadia Shoufani — who was suspended from her duties after making inflammatory comments about Israel at the 2016 anti-Israel hatefest, the Al Quds Day rally.

(Shoufani was apparently working for the Catholic school board when she made the bigoted and racist remarks and is on paid leave while the board tries to figure out what to do with her. And the paid leave has given her time to pen other anti Israel remarks that are offensive to many Cdns who do not see Israel as an object of hate!)

In fact, at that press conference, when I suggested that the anti-Israel remarks of those who spoke were hateful, my right to free speech was attacked and jeered — those insults continuing after the press conference was over.

I don’t recall Singh standing up against the hate spewed at me that day. I suspect, like most politicians, Singh simply hoped that no one would notice he sponsored those hatemongers.

When I tried to reach out to Singh’s federal leadership campaign office Monday to give him an opportunity to comment, I was told at first that he would “not be available” in time for my deadline and was referred to the social media statement I already had.

When I pressed further, I was informed an “interview can’t work out” and was thanked for reaching out.

So pleased to learn that Singh is not only a hypocrite and highly selective about who he feels deserves not to be oppressed but a coward as well.

Slevy at postmedia

(And how sad that our politicians have decided that they should put up public policy that has all the truth and sincerity of Stalinist era Pravda propaganda! As we all know- politicians have been known to exaggerate- but now it seems they are going out of their way to HIDE their true feelings and beliefs- at a time when terrorists are industriously seeking ways to harm us! Supporters of Sharia Law and the LIE-beral anti Islamophobia motion are promoting an murderously irresponsible set of values!)

 

[DaSleeper]

A dog licking someone without their permission is harm, just as spitting on someone is considered assault. The only difference is the dog’s owner is liable for the assault due to negligence (not keeping dog on a leash). Simple logic.

Sitting on a park bench in Mississauga about a month ago with my dog, while having a conversation with a lady while her little girl in a stroller was having a great time petting my dog and getting licked...
This lady in full burka garb comes walking by with her little boy, and like any normal boy he wants to join in the fun, so I pull my dog back with a warning..."Don't... or I'll have to give you a bath when I get home" with a straight face!
It was all the other lady could do to keep from bursting out laughing!
Turnabout is fair play...:lol:

 

[spilledthebeer]

Sitting on a park bench in Mississauga about a month ago with my dog, while having a conversation with a lady while her little girl in a stroller was having a great time petting my dog and getting licked...
This lady in full burka garb comes walking by with her little boy, and like any normal boy he wants to join in the fun, so I pull my dog back with a warning..."Don't... or I'll have to give you a bath when I get home" with a straight face!
It was all the other lady could do to keep from bursting out laughing!
Turnabout is fair play...:lol:

VERY FUNNY STUFF! But were you not worried about getting arrested under the Islamophobia hate laws? You know those lousy LIE-berals would go berserk at such a remark! The Human Rights but too often Wrong people would be all over you!
[/FONT]