It's Kamala

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
45,060
419
83
Washington DC
Yeah the "whatabouitism" could really go into overdrive here, I mean one could easily speak of Trump and his many marital flip flops and numerous affairs with porn stars and Playboy bunnies and the fact that he has five children with three different wives and that he has been accused of sexual assault and rape. But lets face it, most male Trump supporters admire this about him. They think it makes him a man and has it nothing to do with his character because to them women are just things that serve but one purpose.
They f*ckin' ADORE it. It's of a piece with the fake manhood they love so much.

The "successful lover" who uses women like jerk-off tissues.

The "smart businessman" who augered in every business he ever touched and had us at record deficits even before Covid hit.

The "deal maker" whose sole "deal" in 3 1/2 years is a minor, already-scheduled adjustment to NAFTA.

The "tough guy" who pussied out of the draft and sends others to do his dirty work.

The "truth teller" who's logged over 20,000 verified lies.

All he's got is racism, misogyny, homophobia, and jingoism. Abuse of power is his thing. That's why the powerless, worthless punks who feel overwhelmed by the world and their inability to make their way in it love him so much.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,825
69
48

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,851
186
63
Nakusp, BC
Jennifer O’Connell: Why is Trump afraid of Kamala Harris?

Alpha bully boy and US president sees his demise in Biden’s ‘nasty’ running mate

Donald Trump’s instinctive response to women, contrary to what he’d like you to believe, is neither lust nor derision. The US president, whose carefully constructed persona could be described as “boneheaded bully boy with all the charm of a viral droplet”, doesn’t actually look down on women. Despite his brags, he doesn’t much want to grab them either – if he’s in the habit of taking anything to bed with him, according to his biographer Michael Wolff, it is a cheeseburger and three sets of remote controls.
His actual response to women, strong women especially, is fear.
After Joe Biden announced on Tuesday that his running mate would be California senator Kamala Harris, Trump responded by referring to her as “nasty” no fewer than four times, as well as a “madwoman” and the “meanest, most horrible, most disrespectful” member of the Senate. And then he immediately descended into pushing vague “birther” theories about her entitlement to run. All in all, she couldn’t have asked for a better endorsement.
“Nasty”, in particular, is a Trump tell. He uses it for men and women in almost equal measure, according to a running tally by the Washington Post. He also uses it for magazines, TV ads, the occasional review. But it is at its most revealing and flattering when he uses it about women. Those he deems nasty include Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen and Meghan Markle.


More: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/jennifer-o-connell-why-is-trump-afraid-of-kamala-harris-1.4330428
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,825
69
48
Jennifer O’Connell: Why is Trump afraid of Kamala Harris?
Alpha bully boy and US president sees his demise in Biden’s ‘nasty’ running mate
Donald Trump’s instinctive response to women, contrary to what he’d like you to believe, is neither lust nor derision. The US president, whose carefully constructed persona could be described as “boneheaded bully boy with all the charm of a viral droplet”, doesn’t actually look down on women. Despite his brags, he doesn’t much want to grab them either – if he’s in the habit of taking anything to bed with him, according to his biographer Michael Wolff, it is a cheeseburger and three sets of remote controls.
His actual response to women, strong women especially, is fear.
After Joe Biden announced on Tuesday that his running mate would be California senator Kamala Harris, Trump responded by referring to her as “nasty” no fewer than four times, as well as a “madwoman” and the “meanest, most horrible, most disrespectful” member of the Senate. And then he immediately descended into pushing vague “birther” theories about her entitlement to run. All in all, she couldn’t have asked for a better endorsement.
“Nasty”, in particular, is a Trump tell. He uses it for men and women in almost equal measure, according to a running tally by the Washington Post. He also uses it for magazines, TV ads, the occasional review. But it is at its most revealing and flattering when he uses it about women. Those he deems nasty include Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen and Meghan Markle.
More: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/jennifer-o-connell-why-is-trump-afraid-of-kamala-harris-1.4330428
TDS shit.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,851
186
63
Nakusp, BC
TDS shit.


 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
15,441
2,025
113
Twin Moose Creek
digging deep, and irrelevant. Come on TM. Scared that Trump might actually Lose?? Unless he changes the entire constitution........ He will be gone soon anyhow. No POTUS for life unless Trump breaks every rule to become one. Would you like that??

Trump and Trudie maybe at odds but he is the better choice for Western Canadians and our resource industry.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
15,441
2,025
113
Twin Moose Creek
Keep up:
Brown was married at the time he and Harris dated yes, technically but what you're not mentioning is that he had been estranged from his wife for some time and so his and Harris's relationship, which took place in '94 to '95, was in the open.
And right out of college? By right out of college do you mean eight years after she graduated from Howard university in 1986, earning a degree in political science and economics? And do you mean in 1989, five years after she graduated from U of C earning her Juris Doctorate degree? Strange how that could have happened since they didn't even meet until 1994. And further, do you mean four years after she had already been hired as ADA in Alameda County in 1990 where she was being referred to as an able prosecutor on her way up?
And supported her ADA position? By supporting her are you talking about how it was Brown who wanted to keep their relationship in the public eye by making a $500.00 donation to her 2003 campaign while Harris distanced herself from him after she broke off the relationship in 1995, and who, without input or consent from Harris’s team, had a consultant who had worked on his own mayoral campaigns send out a fundraising letter on her behalf, carrying Brown's name? Is that what you're referring to? Because I think you left out a few details that paint the picture in a little different way.
But yes, by all means, let's diminish all of her achievements because she had a relationship with one specific man, decades ago.

Ask Brown if he is lying about his affair I didn't research it or write it
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
15,441
2,025
113
Twin Moose Creek
A trumpian has no right to judge anyone els's relationship.s They have Donald as their "moral' and "ethical"standard.
furthermore..........totally irreverent. What matters is her accomplishments, and her qualifications/ experience. .
Its that old double standard rearing its ugly head again.
Iti s the COMPETENCE that matters........not their personal life.

So she has no blemishes or failures?
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
2
36
Trump saying Kamala is more liberal than Bernie.

Because "liberal" is one of his main planks. He has to use it.

One reason Kamala was a good pick.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
45,060
419
83
Washington DC
Trump saying Kamala is more liberal than Bernie.
Because "liberal" is one of his main planks. He has to use it.
One reason Kamala was a good pick.
Still, the vision of ol' Joe using his vast experience to fix all the stuff the crazy fat kid wrecked while Top Cop Harris puts the fear of the hand on the collar in the scum is. . . satisfying.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
2
36
Joe would be a good talking head while the administration goes about undoing the knots.

He would be a perfect guy for that job - and since Obama and Bill Clinton aren't allowed to....
 

Mockingbird

Council Member
Nov 27, 2019
2,337
126
63
Calgary
Ask Brown if he is lying about his affair I didn't research it or write it


Brown did admit he had a relationship with her, she doesn't deny it either, it was publicly in the open. Tell me, do you think there's a slight chance that he was a jilted ex considering that it was she who ended the relationship? And that he would refer to their relationship as an affair in an attempt to stain her success? Could be seen as sour grapes to some.

And it is evident that you didn't research, sometimes you have to look at the bigger picture to see the bigger picture.
 
Last edited:

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,578
119
63
Canada
Sure. As soon as Trump admits he paid Stormy Daniels hush money.
Which, of course, don't bother you none at all.
It certainly does not bother me at all, most people would surprised if they knew which men paid for sex or paid hush money to keep things quite, it’s really no big deal and nobody’s business unless the guy used government funds to do it.
You Libs just have to learn to get over it.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
20,594
1,351
113
B.C.
Brown did admit he had a relationship with her, she doesn't deny it either, it was publicly in the open. Tell me, do you think there's a slight chance that he was a jilted ex considering that it was she who ended the relationship? And that he would refer to their relationship as an affair in an attempt to stain her success? Could be seen as sour grapes to some.

And it is evident that you didn't research, sometimes you have to look at the bigger picture to see the bigger picture.
You sure seem to know lots about others sex life , is your own that boring ?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,851
186
63
Nakusp, BC
It certainly does not bother me at all, most people would surprised if they knew which men paid for sex or paid hush money to keep things quite, it’s really no big deal and nobody’s business unless the guy used government funds to do it.
You Libs just have to learn to get over it.