Amen.The Sea's & Oceans are the lungs of the planet.
They're munted too.The Sea's & Oceans are the lungs of the planet.
All that dissolved CO2 in the oceans is turning the sea water into club soda, which is killing off a lot of that sealife.Amen.
Thanks to all that sealife we have actual mountains of sequestered CO2 on earth.
I read an article on that a few years back. Apparently there is an escalator that works on a 300 year cycle so what is affecting sea life now was down there 300 years ago. Tonnington talked about it a bit. Have to try and find some of his old posts for more info.All that dissolved CO2 in the oceans is turning the sea water into club soda, which is killing off a lot of that sealife.
Eyewitness reports are quite unreliable.
You first. Explain how the atmospheric conditions are not influenced in any way by vegetation. Ever heard of shade? It's cooler n the shade than in the sun's radiation. Trees tend to add and take away moisture and gases. etcetera
If there's an overly dry season, there will likely be more fires. And conversely, if there is an overly wet season there will likely be fewer fires.
What we're the oceans like with 7000ppm of CO2?All that dissolved CO2 in the oceans is turning the sea water into club soda, which is killing off a lot of that sealife.
Ocean conveyor.I read an article on that a few years back. Apparently there is an escalator that works on a 300 year cycle so what is affecting sea life now was down there 300 years ago. Tonnington talked about it a bit. Have to try and find some of his old posts for more info.
There are Oral records past down from generation to generation just need to ask the elders for them![]()
That would indicate surface temps of oceans, or it could indicate temps in cities. It kind of depends what you do with the readings, huh.Right so let’s put a thermometer in a heat sink and use those readings as the norm .
Yes, the way I am thinking. Whether that fuel ignites and burns kind of depends upon the weather and climate. Notice there aren't very many fires around Kitimat, P. Rupert, etc. and lots of fires in California and other dry places.Not the way you are thinking.
The majority of fires are human caused. As more people go out into the wilderness there are more fires. Also to add to the biased numbers is poor forestry practices forced on us by the greenies. Mostly this is leaving too much fuel on the ground. We never had as much of a problem when we did slash burns.
Yeah, that's pretty obvious and old news, really.That's why temperatures are taken in the shade of a white box in a field.
A healthy boreal forest can create it's own rain and thus climate. Our boreal forest isn't healthy and neither is Siberian boreal forest. It's supposed to burn.
Popular to contrary belief, boreal forest ecosystems are as new as modern man and interdependent on man setting it ablaze.
According to Smokey "only YOU can prevent forest fires" so don't f-cking blame me if modern ecosystems don't go up in smoke, it's your fault for stopping fire.
Plants propagate with or without fire. Just saying.The provincial plant of The Yukon is fireweed . Just saying , for what it is worth .
lol Depends upon who's taking the readings.Not anymore they are suppose to be taken into account for any new environmental study
Ya think?Well duh it doesn't take scientific studies to tell you that fire starts when it is dry and extinguishs when it is wet. Just go camping in the rain and try to start a fire to dry off![]()
All weather and man screwing with the natural fire cycle. All post glaction forests have evolved with man.Yes, the way I am thinking. Whether that fuel ignites and burns kind of depends upon the weather and climate. Notice there aren't very many fires around Kitimat, P. Rupert, etc. and lots of fires in California and other dry places.
That's why I backed it up with a link.Ya think?
Before you go making fun of someone, make sure they aren't correcting mistakes. Like what startyed this conversation was Pete. He said, "Not after 75 years of human interference into natural fire cycles." I simply replied, "So you don't think climates and forestry are related? lol" To which he said, "No fire = weak, malnurtured, disease laden trees, with massive forest floor fuel build up.
The grasslands are suffering the same fate."
His "no" was dead wrong. You'd know that if you paid attention.
Link or not, your "no" was still wrong. Climates and weather have effects upon vegetation and vice versa. Get over it.That's why I backed it up with a link.