I was wondering if anyone knew why he is being accused of manslaughter. The news reports I read didn't have any explanation. Was it his guidance of the ship into the rocks? Not having anyone in the bridge? Having an accident then trying to save your own life isn't manslaughter.
The news I'm getting from European sources is that the Captain wanted to do a favour for the head waiter, who comes from that little island, by giving him a closer than usual view of his home on the way by. So they turned off the autopilot, which would normally have kept the vessel a kilometer from shore, sailed in too close, and hit reefs that are well known, to the locals at least, about 100 meters offshore. So, not following procedure (no autopilot), sailing outside the approved shipping channel, six dead, 60-some injured, loss of the vessel... I think our laws would call that criminal negligence causing death.
The news I'm getting from European sources is that the Captain wanted to do a favour for the head waiter, who comes from that little island, by giving him a closer than usual view of his home on the way by. So they turned off the autopilot, which would normally have kept the vessel a kilometer from shore, sailed in too close, and hit reefs that are well known, to the locals at least, about 100 meters offshore. So, not following procedure (no autopilot), sailing outside the approved shipping channel, six dead, 60-some injured, loss of the vessel... I think our laws would call that criminal negligence causing death.
The news I'm getting from European sources is that the Captain wanted to do a favour for the head waiter, who comes from that little island, by giving him a closer than usual view of his home on the way by. So they turned off the autopilot, which would normally have kept the vessel a kilometer from shore, sailed in too close, and hit reefs that are well known, to the locals at least, about 100 meters offshore. So, not following procedure (no autopilot), sailing outside the approved shipping channel, six dead, 60-some injured, loss of the vessel... I think our laws would call that criminal negligence causing death.
Fair enough. The news reports were just saying he was accused of manslaughter, without expanding on under what grounds.The news I'm getting from European sources is that the Captain wanted to do a favour for the head waiter, who comes from that little island, by giving him a closer than usual view of his home on the way by. So they turned off the autopilot, which would normally have kept the vessel a kilometer from shore, sailed in too close, and hit reefs that are well known, to the locals at least, about 100 meters offshore. So, not following procedure (no autopilot), sailing outside the approved shipping channel, six dead, 60-some injured, loss of the vessel... I think our laws would call that criminal negligence causing death.
"Mr. Schettino has insisted he stayed aboard until the ship was evacuated, but the recording of his conversation with Italian Coast Guard Capt. Gregorio De Falco indicates he fled before all passengers were off — and then resisted Mr. De Falco's repeated orders to return.
“You go on board and then you will tell me how many people there are. Is that clear?” Mr. De Falco shouted in the audio tape.
Mr. Schettino resisted, saying the ship was tipping and that it was dark. At the time, he was in a lifeboat and said he was coordinating the rescue from there.
Mr. De Falco shouted back: “And so what? You want go home, Schettino? It is dark and you want to go home? Get on that prow of the boat using the pilot ladder and tell me what can be done, how many people there are and what their needs are. Now!”
“You go aboard. It is an order. Don't make any more excuses. You have declared the abandoning of the ship, now I am in charge,” Mr. De Falco shouted."
I'm not defending Captain Schettino but I can see why he might have wanted to get the hell off that ship. It was dark, and theI like this bit from the Globe and Mail:
I'm not defending Captain Schettino but I can see why he might have wanted to get the hell off that ship. It was dark, and the
ship was listing at an impossible angle. I don't think anyone could have said the ship wouldn't completely capsize at any
moment. The whole mess was the responsibility of the captain because he ordered the course change that led to the ship
going aground but the reasons for the ensuing panic are also understandable.
I'm not defending Captain Schettino but I can see why he might have wanted to get the hell off that ship.
But the point is, his job was to stay there and take charge of the evacuation.
I doubt that he'll ever work as a Captain again, with this track record.
Typical Italian 'champagne'-horribly oversweetened crud in a bottle as thick as a brick.Supermodel Eva Herzigova predicted disaster when she launched the doomed Italian cruise ship which ran aground Jan. 14 after the traditional Champagne bottle ceremony went horribly wrong.
It has now emerged Czech beauty Herzigova launched the ship back in 2006, but the ceremony went awry when the Champagne bottle, which is traditionally smashed against the hull, failed to break.
According to maritime folklore, an 'unsmashed' bottle spells bad luck for the ship.
Typical Italian 'champagne'-horribly oversweetened crud in a bottle as thick as a brick.